Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: should we fight for all the imbeciles in this country?

Posted 2 years ago on Nov. 30, 2011, 12:38 p.m. EST by Barkode (105)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

while checking my email on my yahoo account I came over this Top News: a Kardashian is pregnant!!

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/kourtney-kardashian-im-pregnant-105104216.html

Every time one ventures to check anything in the mainstream media the slutty KK is big news. Why? Cuz the many millions retards (men AND women!) of this defeated country are enamored with her ass (and, lately, with her scripted divorce).

Leaving the imbeciles to die (ASAP) in poverty is social Darwinism at its best and obviously beneficial for this country. The armies of cretins are as dangerous as the sluts in the Whore House -- we should fight against them, not for them ..

15 Comments

15 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by RichardGayTits (293) 2 years ago

“The armies of cretins are as dangerous as the sluts in the Whore House”

There are many of us that see sluts as a positive thing!

I don't know about those dumb fucks that sit in front of the tube lapping up the faux drama or watching faux news 24/7.

We could do without them! And their brainwashed opinions

[-] 2 points by Spankysmojo (849) 2 years ago

Why do you think that sluts in a whorehouse are dangerous? And, why do you feel the need to fight everything? A free society allows people to broadcast and others to tune out. So simple. I don't watch Kardashian because I'm not interested.

[-] 0 points by Barkode (105) 2 years ago

I didn't spell "whorehouse." The sluts in the Whore House = the traitorous, spineless shabbos goys in the White House ..

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 2 years ago

Well gee, why the fuck didn't we get that?

[-] 2 points by Vooter (441) 2 years ago

But I think huge swaths of the U.S. population--maybe including you!--are imbeciles. Can I get rid of them as I see fit? Who's deciding who's an imbecile?

[-] 0 points by Barkode (105) 2 years ago

I already decided that you are one of them ..

[-] 1 points by Vooter (441) 2 years ago

That's fine--just remember that there are lots of deciders out there... :-)

[-] 0 points by Barkode (105) 2 years ago

and I hate it ("lots of deciders", that is) to da bone! Why can't it be only me and a few other Nobel Prize winners allowed to make decisions?

[-] 1 points by WeMustStandTogether (106) from Newark, NJ 2 years ago

this is wonderful to see ows folks participating in this imbecile's thread. Peace.

[-] 1 points by audidriver28 (16) 2 years ago

I agree 100% but if we can turn OWS into a revolution, then the last thing we would see on the news would be is little misses KK's OWS is shit right now, but if it escalates to a revolution like in Egypt, I guarantee the media will be occupied with more important events, l

[-] 0 points by Barkode (105) 2 years ago

OK, so I'll take it that when we won't see KK in the media we've won :)

[-] 1 points by audidriver28 (16) 2 years ago

Sounds like a win to me lol!!!!!!

[-] 1 points by ithink (761) from York, PA 2 years ago

This is a really good question. How are we defining imbecile? is it just people who follow the mainstream media and don't think for themselves? is it someone who does think on their own, but comes up with world views no one else can relate to? I am not sure "get rid of them" is an attainable goal. In the end we have to do what we can with what we have. This does not mean though, that we can do nothing. The idea of being a leader is that you lead through example, not to attain blind followers, but to teach. So if we work on ourselves and our actions, others may learn to do the same.

[-] 0 points by Barkode (105) 2 years ago

let's simplify, for the sake of revolution (and the grass will be greener): an imbecile is what I call an imbecile ..

[-] 1 points by ithink (761) from York, PA 2 years ago

lol, ok. Just for the record, I am in the camp of "killing them all may be crossing the line a bit."