Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: [DELETED]

Posted 1 year ago on Nov. 29, 2012, 1:27 p.m. EST by anonymous ()
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

[DELETED]

6 Comments

6 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 0 points by TechJunkie (3029) from Miami Beach, FL 1 year ago

Wow and I didn't think that this forum was entertaining enough to keep me interested any more. Thank you for providing some hilarious paranoia to brighten my day. You really think that somebody is going to invest actual money on playing forum games with a captive audience of about 12 unemployed people and their dozens of sock puppets?

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 1 year ago

I would post the documents but they like to call it spam, so you'll have to dig through old posts to find the documents. One for a security firm and one for the ABA. This is not based on assumption, but rather likelihood based on leaked documents. The ranking of this site makes it relevant to both.

[-] 0 points by TechJunkie (3029) from Miami Beach, FL 1 year ago

As an Internet professional, you know that ranking on a term that isn't popular isn't useful. I could easily take the #1 ranking for the search target "spagettidoodles" but it wouldn't earn me any traffic. This site ranks on a term that was a big deal a long time ago that isn't very relevant any more. Take a look at the Google Trends data on "occupy wall street". Then look at the Alexa stats for this site. Note how they mirror one another.

There are a handful of regular posters on this site, and those people are not relevant enough to anybody to justify spending money on covert propaganda campaigns. The fear of cognitive infiltration around here is hilarious because it presumes an exaggerated sense of relevance.

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 1 year ago

3 people, 10-20-100 websites. Go look at what has happened to many of the other Occupy sites and forums that have less ability or time for maintaining their sites. They are all trashed. No, of course I don't think anyone would spend that much money to trash one site, but they could spend a lot of time working the last one that refuses to die.

[-] 2 points by TechJunkie (3029) from Miami Beach, FL 1 year ago

But.. why? The mere idea is hilarious. If a bunch of nerds with a fan site about Lindsey Lohan reacted to spam comments with talk about the anti-Lindsey mercenaries intent on destroying their site then you would bust out laughing. Right?

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 1 year ago

It is absurd, I'm not denying that. But look at some of the things these kind of people engage in out in the wide open. Some of the ads they spend a lot of money to push on TV are no less absurd. I think the phrase goes "more dollars than sense". It is of course absurd, until you look at what Occupy has done to the political atmosphere, the violence that has been perpetrated on a handful of executives by freaks (sad but it happens). Then it becomes a little less absurd. Only a little though because all we have to offer is text and images :D