Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
The revolution continues worldwide!

Forum Post: RNC Confirms Ron Paul Will Be Up For Nomination

Posted 10 months ago on July 17, 2012, 7:22 p.m. EST by DeepSpace (-1)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

RNC Confirms Ron Paul Will Be Up For Nomination

For the past three days, Ben Swann (Fox19 Cincinnati) has been in contact with a Republican Rules Committee member.

In order for a candidate to be elected for the Republican Party nomination, the candidate must have a plurality in five or more states.

If by rule, binding and non-binding policies are applied to delegates, it would still not affect the process of voting for placement of a candidate's name into the potential nominee ballot.

Presidential hopeful Ron Paul does have a plurality in five or more states (Nevada, Maine, Minnesota, Louisiana, and Iowa).

This means that Ron Paul will be eligible for nomination on August 26th in Tampa Bay.

http://www.examiner.com/article/rnc-confirms-ron-paul-will-be-up-for-nomination

7 Comments

7 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (25708) from Coon Rapids, MN 10 months ago

Does this mean the repub party has been running a campaign of fright tactics (?) running compulsive liar Mittens so that the party would sigh with relief to get RP back?

Hhmmm ... boy the repubs sure are stuck with some real turkeys - Hey?

[-] 2 points by ronniepaul2012 (214) 10 months ago

Do you think compulsive lieing is somehow worse than the calculated lies that Obama spews? Our Potemkin President's fictional biography is a good place to start your investigation of Barry Soeroto's false story.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by conservatroll (117) 10 months ago

Unfortunately, Romney is a lock.

[-] 1 points by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY 10 months ago

The Bain/Tax/Adelson scandals may sink the old boy yet...

http://arrestmittromney.blogspot.com/2012/07/who-is-sheldon-adelson-bibi-connection.html

[-] 1 points by friendlyopposition (574) 10 months ago

So?

[-] 0 points by geo (2661) from Concord, NC 10 months ago

Ron Paul is more conservative than Reagan was.... we need this? I think not.

[-] 0 points by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY 10 months ago

NU?