Posted 3 months ago on Feb. 4, 2013, 4:32 p.m. EST by owsarmy
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Is this meaningful? I recently expressed the opinion that Democrats have utilized the language of OWS to get elected and push certain legislation.
Although a fellow poster misunderstood and accused me of several statements I didn't make, in the end he did corroborate my harmless statement.
As you can see here:
While OWS remains properly uninvolved with party politics, and direct campaigning, Do we care if our agenda is supported by politicians currently in power?
I liked Kucinich, (but he was redistricted out of office), Grayson is excellent, and Warren shows great promise in her stated positions on wall st. Of course Sanders has always been great, and other politicians who are members of the progressive caucus.
I suppose I still believe we must get money out of politics and retire all anti 99% politicians from both corrupted parties.
I suggest we consider who supports the change we are fighting for. Let's identify any other Kucinichs/graysons/Sanders who might be amongst this corp bought congress.
So that when and if we implement a new system we might have a good idea of who can be trusted.