Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: RePost - "COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a[n] internet forum"

Posted 2 years ago on Feb. 8, 2012, 4:38 p.m. EST by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Posted 1 day ago on Feb. 7, 2012, 11:23 a.m. EST by nomdeguerre (514) from Brooklyn, NY This content is user submitted and not an official statement

From http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x281170 .

"There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'

Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING' If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING' A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at www.abovetopsecret.com ) is 'consensus cracking.' To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made - but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger 'evidence' or disinformation in your favour is slowly 'seeded in.' Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then 'abort' the consensus cracking by initiating a 'forum slide.'

Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION' Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.

Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION' Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a 'show you mine so me yours' posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your 'favourite weapon' and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the forum members and posting your favourite 'technique of operation.' From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.

Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING' Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes - without the requirement to 'stage' a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to 'lead' the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you 'do not care what the authorities think!!' inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.

Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL' It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes."

.

.

Consensus Cracks - Item 2

38 Comments

38 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 2 years ago

We got a Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING' -- Craigdangit, http://occupywallst.org/forum/is-outsourcing-always-universally-and-unconditiona/ . He seems so reasonable, until you realize he actually is an anti-American-jobs, anti-middle-class-way-of-life POS.

[-] 2 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

I can't believe that someone with the emotional maturity of a two year old would be allowed to run riot around here.

It's too bad.

cya

[-] 1 points by EndTheFED (65) 2 years ago

I'm going to "ARE PEE" you if you say penis one more time

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 2 years ago

Why doesn't "all walks of life" include people who are conservatives or Republicans? ZenDog (and shooz) constantly utter hate speech here with the constant fawning approval of their "fans". The hate speech THEY engage in is welcomed and encouraged here and it's JUST as bigoted and wrong as anything else.

[-] 1 points by shooz (17710) 2 years ago

I just hate (R)epelican'ts. I came by that naturally, no one had to pay me, and I didn't need any training.

What is this other "hate speech" you claim I'm uttering?

[-] 0 points by B76RT (-357) 2 years ago

not many people admit to hating Abraham Lincoln.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (34978) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Agree to Disagree. Unite in common cause to end corruption and it's manipulations. Lets all move forward together.

Republican, Democrat, Left, Right or middle. It does not matter.

There is corruption throughout government State and Federal..

There are good people of all of these persuasions ( listed above ) still in government also.

Let us stop arguing about differences, and start discussing common cause.

Let us all get past the distractions, and start working together to move forward in healing government, stopping corruption and making a better world for "ALL".

[-] 1 points by BradB (2693) from Washington, DC 2 years ago

oh... crap ... you mean quit playing and back to work ? ... ;)

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (34978) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Does not mean you can't have fun. Fun is good and healthy for the spirit. But we don't need to have fun at each-others expense. Lets have our fun in taking down the corrupt and greedy practices in our world.

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 2 years ago

Thanks ZD for reposting this. The original can still be accessed directly (I think) at http://www.occupywallst.org/forum/cointelpro-techniques-for-dilution-misdirection-an/ .

I just posted a test comment there. It showed up, but when I logged off the whole post disappeared again. Amazing (and shameful).

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

the moderation policies on this board are kinda fucked aren't they

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 2 years ago

Amen.

[-] 1 points by EndTheFED (65) 2 years ago

I'm confused <---- Is the comments below an example of what your talking about in the article...

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

duh

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

Hiroshi said 2 minutes ago at Feb. 8, 2012, 4:59 p.m. EST (delete)

Delete your re-posing of anti-gay material if you do not want jart to ban you and my bots to hound you.

ZenDog said 0 minutes ago at Feb. 8, 2012, 5:03 p.m. EST (delete)

Hiroshi said 2 minutes ago at Feb. 8, 2012, 4:59 p.m. EST (delete)

Delete your re-posing of anti-gay material if you do not want jart to ban you and my bots to hound you.

[Removed]

[-] 2 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

Re-posing postings which have been banned by the moderators is not wise.

what's that? I can't hear so well, I'm afraid the rest of your message has been lost in translation . . .

  • just fucking shoot me

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

I'm not - I'm entirely in favor of the gay marriage and the end of don't ask don't tell.

The gay bashing post should simply be removed. The poster should be banned. Note could be made to that effect.

There is no reason to shadow ban the post COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum"

It contains valuable information that should be accessible to all honest users of the forum.

Ban me. I don't much care. The fuckin righties have pretty well taken it over already anyway.

  • it ain't over till it's over
[-] 2 points by EndTheFED (65) 2 years ago

Technique 5

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

you are doing a great job too,

  • you pink pantied penis poser

[Removed]

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

it's plainly labed - consensus cracks -

delete the post, I'll be more than happy to disable the link

you childish fuck

spamming my inbox is a completely inappropriate response

The post is labeled plainly as an example of Consensus Cracking, item 2

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago
  • just fukin shoot me

you pink pantied penis poser

[Removed]

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by EndTheFED (65) 2 years ago

Technique #3 - '

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by EndTheFED (65) 2 years ago

i think you guy(s) are crazy and talk about penis too much

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by EndTheFED (65) 2 years ago

i think the only movement you care about is in your paints. you can say penis all you like Just say Are Pee. That is forbinan and calls for you to get banned.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

how the fuck did trashy, aka RoadWarrior get access to shadow ban shit?

wtf?

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13203) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

ZenDog said 0 minutes ago at Feb. 8, 2012, 4:40 p.m. EST (delete)

i'd like to snap your scrawny little neck you pink pantied penis poser

FUCK YOU

YOU KOCH SUCKER

RoadWarrior said 3 minutes ago at Feb. 8, 2012, 4:37 p.m. EST (delete)

FYI - I shadow banned the COINTELLPRO discussion. This type of speech is off-topic and divisive.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 2 years ago

stop banning stuff

[Removed]