Forum Post: Providing and Ability
Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 2, 2011, 8:15 p.m. EST by cubedemon
(185)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I think conservatives do ask this one valid question. Should a person be forced to provide for another. The counterargument is what if they can't provide for themselves for whatever reason?
It seems like, both seem like valid questions. I will ask this. Is there a way for everyone to get what they need no matter what circumstances without forcing anyone to provide anyone anything? Could a society be set up like this in which both sides get what they want?
No, each side is greedy. People abuse the tax system just as much as people abuse government handouts and help.
Its a good question and really has no right answer. I tend to believe that every human being is responsible for themselves. However as a Christian I feel a strong obligation to always help those less fortunate. I guess I believe no person has any obligation to any other person, however if somebody has means they should voluntarily help others.
Human suffering, trumps any discussion of what is right and what is wrong. If a human is suffering, anywhere, we will take / steal any and everything - to alleviate his suffering- do i fucken make myself clear! training web page http://tinyurl.com/7rvpv43
Isn't that just called Fascism?
Using force to make others help what you consider worthy is not a system of government. You are a retard.