Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Part of the corpoRATist agenda - national voter disenfranchisement.

Posted 2 years ago on July 28, 2012, 12:15 p.m. EST by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

This is a corpoRATist agenda ( one of many of their ongoing campaigns ) disenfranchise the people - kick them ( us ) and their ( our ) rights to the trash bin.

Here's Turzai admitting it on camera - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuOT1bRYdK8&feature=player_embedded

How better to help steal an election - than to deny the right to vote to those citizens who would NO WAY IN HELL support corpoRATist policies of self destruction pollution war and death for profit.

18 Comments

18 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 2 years ago

Absolutely CorpoRATS and their home team, the RATpublicans, hate democracy and are doing everything possible to defeat it.

There is a plan afoot to steal this election. We can't stop it by sitting on our hands.

The Egyptian Tahrir square revolutionaries have so far been totally outflanked. OWS can not allow that to happen to ourselves.

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

The corpoRATS and the corpoRATists are hiding behind the ideology of the republican party to "fool" republican supporters to support "them".

People read the definition of republic.

1 definition there are more:

Republic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic A republic is a form of government in which the state is considered a "public matter" (Latin: res publica), not the private concern or property of the rulers, and ...


What is being done in government by false republicans and what is being done in public by a false republican party - do not support the beliefs/ideology of Republic.

[-] 2 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 2 years ago

Or of many on-the-ground Republicans. They have no idea that they are being led by traitors to America.

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 2 years ago

They are getting away with it where they can.

Is it any wonder that most of the States it's most effective in are also those with low standards of education?

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/07/27/alabama-attorney-general-files-suspiciously-partisan-lawsuit/

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

The South is ripe for manipulation/misinformation. Sad - But - True.

[-] 1 points by fairforall (279) 2 years ago

DKA, what part of the federal government is overseeing any of the current effort(s) of validating/purging voter rolls?

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

I did not say that the federal government was engaged in this activity. The disenfranchisement of the American voter is a campaign being run by the corpoRATions/corpoRATists state by state.

[-] 1 points by fairforall (279) 2 years ago

I understand that. So is there any entity within our federal government who is ensuring that no voter disenfranchisement is taking place? The DHS approved states access to databases to assist them in purging. Who is ensuring the purging has a proper and valid process?

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

The people have brought suit in Florida and I believe that the federal justice department is at this point in time looking into it. As these issues are brought to the attention of the public in these affected states I believe the same is being done - suits filed by entities like the ACLU complaints filed with the federal government and then investigated.

[-] 0 points by fairforall (279) 2 years ago

Please be reminded that the DHS has knowingly given dbase access specifically for the review and purging of databases. It's not an "unknown" activity by an means.

Then as long as the federal government is providing oversight (and I think they should) you should have no issue that an effective and fair purging will take place. Unless of course, you have no confidence in the current Presidential administration to provide effective and fair oversight.

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Yeah that no-fly list was real comprehensive (NOT).

[-] 0 points by fairforall (279) 2 years ago

Is that a response saying you have no confidence in the current administration to provide adequate oversight - yes or no?

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

I believe that government and it's institutions need a lot of work. Nice how the justice department went after the economic criminals of wallstreet and their international counterparts.

Hhmmm....yeah that was awesome......hmmm......?.......wait a minute......that never happened!

[-] 0 points by fairforall (279) 2 years ago

Is that a response saying you have no confidence in the current administration to provide adequate oversight - yes or no?

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

I have no confidence in the majority of the current governments representatives nor in the current governments actions/inactions.

Read my open letters to government and you will have a better understanding of my views.

[-] -1 points by fairforall (279) 2 years ago

All I wanted was a response that you had no confidence in the current administration to provide proper oversight. You said "no".

Let's do the math.

Obama adminstration = support of the corpoRATist agenda and support of the disenfranchisement of voters

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

tweet it.

I did.