Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: OWS wants solidarity but does not give any.

Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 20, 2011, 6:10 p.m. EST by Oolith (40)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

I was pretty shocked when OWS did not even say diddles in solidarity for another, Libya had a great victory today. The whole world spoke about it. OWS voice was noticeably missing. Check the news section for yourself. # posts today and not one nod toward Libya. :(

13 Comments

13 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by stevonbi (85) 12 years ago

Hooray for parading a dead guy who had already been deposed. I salute Libya. But I am sick with worry for our own country, which is undergoing a dictatorship that's much harder to put your finger on.

[-] 1 points by Oolith (40) 12 years ago

This is true. And the first logical reply, but solidarity should be given if one wants it in return. On the front page of this site it say Occupy the World. Except Libya... I suppose.

[-] 1 points by stevonbi (85) 12 years ago

Instead of complaining of no statement of solidarity, why not simply MAKE your statement, and not a challenge which is sure to ruffle feathers?

[-] 0 points by Oolith (40) 12 years ago

I have been coming to OWS to get one thing or another to use in negotiations with cities, to help get our occupations up. I really did think OWS was about solidarity. I noticed OWS voice was missing this morning, I thought it must have been a media ignore. I came here to get it from the news section. The solidarity was not there. It appears that when it come to solidarity they ask for it, but do not return it. Or they would have said at least boo about Libya. BTW. my sites did put up a Solidarity with Libya statement. Not much of one just 3 sentences and 2 pictures

[-] 1 points by stevonbi (85) 12 years ago

Oh, I see....you don't give a shit about solidarity w/Libya, just tearing down OWS. I thought as much.......

[-] 1 points by Oolith (40) 12 years ago

Actually I do defecate everyday, nevertheless, I do not see why that would be an argument. Concerning Libya, yes, I was very involved in the beginning, As of the OWS, I think the tearing is occurring by natural means. I am not certain if tearing is a bad thing. This is my first visit to the domain as a participant. Though, there is recycled ideas that are collected in one spot thus making this site plainly useful. The forums, chat and other such things are useful as an containment area for such sorts that value anonymous disruption gathering locations. Cheers!

[-] 1 points by stevonbi (85) 12 years ago

What?!? you don't shit for Libya?? Where is your solidarity?? You are an impostor!!!!! Meaningless mumbo-jumbo to try to make us look bad. GO...have solidarity with Libya. Somewhere else. Please.

[-] 0 points by JonFromSLC (-107) from West Valley City, UT 12 years ago

Libya is in a transition period. Remove one dictator, replace him with another dictator.

[-] 1 points by Oolith (40) 12 years ago

Do you have the lotto numbers for GA pick Five, soothsayer?

[-] 0 points by JonFromSLC (-107) from West Valley City, UT 12 years ago

6, 42, 4, 27, 19

good luck!

[-] 0 points by BonaFidePublius (93) 12 years ago

And this is the problem. People do not understand that the banks are causing these wars. The give these countries faulty loans that they couldnt imagine to pay back and invade when they dont pay up.

[-] 0 points by professor101 (27) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

Is OWS already cowering to political patronage?

[-] 1 points by Oolith (40) 12 years ago

Is asking for Solidarity being political? If so, should OWS be asking for Solidarity?