Posted 1 year ago on Jan. 30, 2012, 10:22 a.m. EST by pedro01
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
OWS lawyers argued that the 'power of the symbolic speech is that it is a 24-hour occupation' and told the court they would 'supplement the record wit pleadings and other documents expeditiously' . in January this year, the OWS lawyers dropped the case. An admission of defeat for OWS....now we know that the laws/rules prohibiting the 24/7 occupation of a park is a reasonable restriction supported by decades of Supreme Court precedent. Information from article in wsj 'Occupy AstroTurf'.