Forum Post: Over 4 thousand US soldiers killed and over 100,000 civilians killed by terrorists
Posted 11 years ago on Jan. 21, 2012, 9:49 p.m. EST by TrevorMnemonic
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I'm still waiting for something to be done about this. They will continue to get away with this because the US government is corrupt.
If I was responsible for the deaths of 4 thousand US troops and over a hundred thousand civilians, I'd be called a terrorist and sent to Guantanamo or just killed immediately by a drone strike. The Bush administration is responsible for FRAUD and heinous war crimes.
Bush and Tony Blair found guilty of war crimes - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZxa0-IXl_U&feature=related
A well educated citizen and member of the armed services clearly defines every way the Bush administration has violated the laws of the land, most of this also applies to the Obama administration as well - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxO-UNVO2U0
The West... for all their smart bombs and precision munitions have made collateral damage into an art form. Every civilian killed gives someone else incentive to pick up arms against us and our allies.
For all of our efforts at providing "liberation and peace," people in Afghanistan and Iraq have only seen more violence, death and destruction than ever in their entire history... they have seen the institution of unstable factionalized governments who are more concerned with the establishment of their own power than the welfare of the people...
Lets stop pretending we are doing this for either their people our ours. At least spare us and them from that indignity.
The enemy is Terrorism. Terrorists is Global Money Kartell! Public Enemy is Rockefeller, Soros, Rotschild, Kissinger... The Patriot is: J. F. Kennedy, Benjamin Harrison Freedman ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhFRGDyX48c )... USA not free, USA is Colony! (since "1913 federal reserve act" )
The U.S.A. is a terrorist nation, and we are all, through our taxes, terrorist supporters.
That's what really sucks.
The government has lost the way of diplomacy.
Talk to their foreign governments? No thanks, DRONE STRIKE. This has been the standard practice for Obama.
The US government was bought out by corporations and the Israel lobby.
grammatically speaking perhaps the use of past and the present continuous tense needs to be used in your remark as demonstrated in the following extract.
“…Once a year, AIPAC holds its annual conference in Washington DC. This May (2011) it was attended by over 5,000 participants. Its annual policy conference is one of Washington’s largest gatherings of lawmakers, topped only by the President’s State of the Union address. Guests this year included two-thirds of the House, half the Senate, and Vice President Richard Cheney.
AIPAC, or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, describes itself as the most important organization affecting the U.S. relationship with Israel. With a budget of $65 million, and membership now standing at over 100,000, it is no wonder that congressional staffers consider it one of the most powerful and effective lobbies on Capitol Hill. …”
. . . or at least, pretending as much is a good justification for the myriad of stupid shit you believe, amirite?
Curiosity: How Did America Get Its Shape? or censored name What's Beneath America on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FjbjWiUIf4 very interesting, but same trolling as you like. Why is there two different name for tv series? who changed it and why is this bother me?
The problem is this. Our troops have one hand "tied behind their back" when it comes to fighting the enemy.
If you look at the history of ww II it ended quickly because there were "no bars hold" meaning that "anything goes".
Not so today and as a result we are losing a lot of Americans becaue of it "regardless of whether we need to be there or not".
BWA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAA!!!
What complete BUNK!
Really, do you really think you can pass off that 45-year-old bullshit argument HERE?
Wow, some people never grow up or get a clue!
Yeah, we'll nuke Afghanistan back to the stone age! That's what you want, right? Oh wait. They're already in the stone age.
Then we'll move on to Pakistan and slaughter everyone there. YEAH! Oh wait, there are still plenty of people who hate us, especially once we do that.
So we're slaughter THEM!
And then we'll move on to EVERYBODY ELSE ON THE PLANET, who will hate us by then also!
And we'll kill THEM! TAKE THAT YOU FUCKERS!!!!
Oh wait, we just killed everybody on the planet. Nice job!
We have really created a lot of negative sentiment in the world, for very justifyable reasons, and I say we better atone for it by bringing those responsible to justice! That is the very leasst we can do! You don't just attack another nation and then say, "Oh, wow, wrong country. Sorry guys."
"Oops, sorry, guys, wrong country! Wait. We couldn't help but notice y'all have a heck of a lot of oil here! Mind if we help ourselves? Thanks!"
When I think of the sacrifice we made in WWII, and that it all came down to this - well, there just aren't words to describe how that makes me feel.
George Carlin said "Hitler may have lost WWII but Fascism won".
He was right.
George Carlin could be painfully honest.
US was one of the last countries to join WWII because there wasn't any thing in it. When there's oil like in Iraq, US is the first on the field. Damn Americans!
Occupy should use direct action to force all US wars to end. You guys need to bring your troops home and stop acting the you're the police fo the world. Damn Americans!
that's assuming nobody kills us first
absolutly right. nobody kills US first even if we have provocative image: google search: Frank Wuterich http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Wuterich
No. The problem is that we are creating even more enemies. In fighting wars with no factual basis for legitimacy.
Well, lets say that there "never was a 911". Do you think we would be at war then and "if so" why?
Well, let's say you were never born. Do you think we'd be having this conversation? No, probably somebody just as stupid as you would be here.
Yes. First you can say that THEY needed a scapegoat to go to war with Iraq. But look at Libya. The US will always find a reason to invade or bomb if they want to. Then look how Iraq went from "WMD's" to "Saddam is bad and we need to free the people of Iraq." Then most Americans were okay with the war being based on a lie because "Saddam is bad and had it coming."
People can play the "Gaddafi killed some people" card all they want but then why didn't we try to assassinate the leader of China and bomb them over what happened in Tibet?
Blood money runs deep in the US government.
To be honest... I am not sure... at least about Afghanistan... but they could have any number of reasons... Liberation of the Afghan people? Retaliation for embassy bombings, or USS Cole while citing "Credible intelligence" suggesting Al Quaeda leadership present in Afghanistan? Maybe they find 'evidence' of the Taliban having stolen one of Pakistan's nukes? Maybe an extension of the war on drugs?
Personally I think 9/11 was just a convenient event for the Military Industrial complex to force war on the US people... we were looking for a scapegoat... they were out to make a buck... Afghanistan was a sitting duck... not saying the Taliban are good guys... or that there were no Al Quaeda members in Afghanistan, but the fact is that most of them were from Saudi Arabia... or were funded via Saudi Arabia.... why arent they being invaded?
what if some terrorist group having nukes and located in iran? Does it mean that we have to raid to Iran, assasinate their regime and take the power, or just bomb all over and then take the power and laundry money for rebuild infrastucture? is something missing there? Ohh, terrorists, let them attempt to use it first, and then punish them =) we dont know if something exist if there is no evidence and no outcome. let make it clear, Ok!? no terrorist know how to operate even helicopter, without proper skill!