Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: OPINION: Congress, lies and statistics Sen. Sessions manipulates GAO report about Obamacare for partisan points

Posted 11 years ago on March 4, 2013, 9:33 a.m. EST by GirlFriday (17435)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

What Sessions was doing was engaging in a practice common in politics and propaganda—“statisticulation.” If you haven’t come across that word before, check out How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff, a classic that’s as relevant today as it was when first published in 1954.

“Misinforming people by the use of statistical material,” Huff wrote, “might be called statistical manipulation; in a word: statisticulation.”

Statisticulation is an apt description of what the senator was doing with the GAO report. He was disclosing only the data that would support his assumptions. The truth is that it would take a scenario in which future Congresses repealed or phased out the deficit-reducing sections of the law—or all of them failed completely—for the $6.2 trillion addition to the deficit to be realized. And even if all that happened, that $6.2 trillion, which came from Sessions’ staffs’ calculations, not the GAO report, would be spread out over 75 years. That’s right. Three-quarters of a century.

Sessions did not disclose the GAO simulation showing that Obamacare will lead to a decline in the deficit over the same time frame if it is implemented as Congress intended, with the cost-cutting and revenue-generating provisions intact.

The GAO report stated that, “The primary deficit declined 1.5 percentage points as a share of GDP over the 75-year period in this (GAO’s Baseline Extended) simulation.” But somehow those words didn’t make it into Sessions’s disclosure. He disclosed only the alternative simulation. And he made certain to disclose it several hours before the GAO made the report available to the press and the rest of the world.

More from Wendell Potter here



Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by inclusionman (7064) 11 years ago

Lying fucks!

[-] 2 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

Hell, I've seen people around here smear Potter.

Potter knows exactly how they twist stats to fit their purposes.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

You would have to be paid to post to go that route.