Forum Post: Okay a path forward
Posted 11 years ago on Feb. 8, 2013, 12:16 a.m. EST by quantumystic
(1710)
from Memphis, TN
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I wrote this in idiot speak so people can not have to ask questions. We need a green economy is one centered around sustainability, autonomy, and ecological renewal and preservation this means i am a proponent of concepts like Renewable energy (solar, wind, geothermal, marine including wave, biogas, and fuel cell) Green buildings (green retrofits for energy and water efficiency, residential and commercial assessment; green products and materials, and LEED construction),clean transportation (alternative fuels, public transit, hybrid and electric vehicles, carsharing and carpooling programs), water management (water reclamation, greywater and rainwater systems, low-water landscaping, water purification, stormwater management). Waste management (recycling, municipal solid waste salvage, brownfield land remediation, Superfund cleanup, sustainable packaging). Land management (organic agriculture, habitat conservation and restoration; urban forestry and parks, reforestation and afforestation and soil stabilization).Environmentally sustainable, based on the belief that our biosphere is a closed system with finite resources and a limited capacity for self-regulation and self-renewal. We depend on the earth’s natural resources, and therefore we must create an economic system that respects the integrity of ecosystems and ensures the resilience of life supporting systems. Socially just, based on the belief that culture and human dignity are precious resources that, like our natural resources, require responsible stewardship to avoid their depletion. We must create a vibrant economic system that ensures all people have access to a decent standard of living and full opportunities for personal and social development. Locally rooted, based on the belief that an authentic connection to place is the essential pre-condition to sustainability and justice. The Green Economy is a global aggregate of individual communities meeting the needs of its citizens through the responsible, local production and exchange of goods and services. Open-source economics is an economic platform based on free and open collaboration for the production of software, services, or other products. anarcho-syndicalism consists of Worker self-management (sometimes called workers' control or autogestion) is a form of workplace decision-making in which the workers themselves agree on choices (for issues such as customer care, general production methods, scheduling, division of labour) and the workers not the state or private capital own the means of production and the decisions are made through direct democracy. Modern society has access to highly advanced technology and can make available food, clothing, housing and medical care; update our educational system; and develop a limitless supply of renewable, non-contaminating energy. By supplying an efficiently designed economy, everyone can enjoy a very high standard of living with all of the amenities of a high technological society. A resource-based economy would utilize existing resources from the land and sea, physical equipment, industrial plants, etc. to enhance the lives of the total population. In an economy based on resources rather than money, we could easily produce all of the necessities of life and provide a high standard of living for all. Technocracy is a form of government in which experts in technology would be in control of all decision making. Scientists, engineers, and technologists who have knowledge, expertise, or skills, would compose the governing body, instead of politicians, businessmen, and economists. In a technocracy, decision makers would be selected based upon how knowledgeable and skillful they are in their field. Meritocracy is the implementation of advancement based upon intellectual talent. Often, advancement is determined by demonstrated achievement in the field where it is implemented. Sociocracy is a system of governance, using consent-based decision making among equivalent individuals and an organizational structure based on cybernetic principles. Direct democracy is a form of democracy in which people vote on policy initiatives directly, as opposed to a representative democracy in which people vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives. I also support judicial independence which is the idea that the judiciary needs to be kept away from the other branches of government. That is, courts should not be subject to improper influence from the other branches of government, or from private or partisan interests. I also believe this should be a meritocracy/sociacracy.. Did you get all that?????????????
Yes, yes, yes I am working towards my 5 institutions overhaul it's coming.
one word - HOW ?
social media.
Some interesting points.
But man take a chill pill.
chilling is what got us to this point.
Can you list the 5 institutions to be overhauled?
Something tells me, as foul as your mouth might be, that we are somewhat like-minded and I may want to merge some of your ideas with mine. I think if you really understood what I'm driving towards with the 99% Conglomerate and Departmental Governance, you might like it as much as I do.
The special thing about what I'm developing is that it doesn't need leadership or party membership/allegiance to get rolling and be successful. No one needs to do more (hours/day) that what they are already doing, and there is nothing for anyone to lose (except maybe future profit for certain large capitalist corporations).
http://occupywallst.org/forum/if-we-start-over-what-would-the-social-institution/
ah, that. I actually skimmed over it before.
I think I posted on the topic at least three times. I mentioned the 99% Conglomerate and Departmental Governance there.
Looking forward to winning you over one day. And to your follow-up on the 5 institutions, which I'm sure will be as well-written as what you just linked me to.
[Deleted]
no.
No. You have to break that up into a couple of paragraphs at least. I'm not fighting it.
i don't HAVE to do a thing.
You're motherfucking correct. I don't have to fight to read your shit either. Fuck your shit. How 'bout them apples? I will be more willing to read your shit if you ever decide to pull your head out of your ass. Until that point in time you will just have to whine and cry like the little bitch you are.
hey you are right fuck my shit, only thing is one day and soon you will be following my shit.
Follow your shit? On what? America's Most Wanted?
Fuck your shit. I'm not in the shit business.
yeah. if you want freedom, liberty, progress, equal rights, social and economic justice. follow me. 2016. if not, drink some more centrist koolaid see how drunk that gets you.
No. You were done in this thread and in this thread and your thread on Christopher Dormer.
it is obvious you are not ready for a real leader. good thing millions are.
Ya. Legend in your own mind, much?
i am legend.
Just curious -- do I understand that sometime soon, like maybe 2016, you'll do something big that'll grab the world's attention and prove the doubters here wrong? If so, mind letting us in in what it might be? These hints have piqued my interest.
For someone who claims to advocate "for the belief that culture and human dignity are precious resources that, like our natural resources, require responsible stewardship to avoid their depletion" you don't appear to practice what you preach.
how so? by not patronizing morons? by not entertaining the idiotic politically correct rhetoric that has polluted intelligent debate? tell me what it is that i preach and don't practice?
You show no human dignity or ability to debate intelligently.
Is there a discussion here or just paraphrasis of the definitions of social institutions? Boring.
your momma.
So basically, you're dumb and you have an inferiority complex, so you wrote a rambling post full of definitions that anyone can look up on the interbutts in order to feel better?
ever play the dozens?
Your writing style is very indicative of someone with a mental illness. I really hope you get the help you need because you do bring up good points, here and other places. Your angry, ranting style makes it hard for people to take you seriously.
the help i need? you have a battalion ready to go?
quanty is the face/voice of ows.
[-] 1 points by auargent (-157) 3 minutes ago quanty is the face/voice of ows. ↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink
Um........does that make you the 250 lb., bleach blond, high school drop out, K-Mart matching pant set, white chic poster child for the Tea Party?
Paragraphs are our friend. Clean it up, then I’ll read it.
[Removed]
it's written specifically for dumb fucks like yourself.
"I wrote this in idiot speak so people can not have to ask questions."
Even "idiots" have feelings and a smart person would know that neither idiots, nor people who love them, are going to want to read or support anything written by someone who cannot convey information without insults. Then again, a smart person would also know that small words, short sentences, and spacing actually help with clarity in conveying information to idiots.
take your sensitivities and your political correctness and your opinions and shove them up your ass. have a nice day.
And good luck to you and your overhaul with that attitude. I'm sure you will be wildly successful. And thanks, I'm having a GREAT day!
you mad bro? ha ha ha ha ha ha.
[Deleted]
Nope. Not at all. :)