Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Occupy Oakland Attempts to Shut Down City with America's First General Strike in 65 Years

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 2, 2011, noon EST by DonQuijote (55) from West Springfield, MA
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Today, Occupy Oakland may just pull off a feat that appeared all but impossible a few days ago. If they do, it will represent a dramatic escalation of the movement's tactics.

It would be an extremely tall order. But today, they might just pull off a feat that appeared all but impossible just a few short days ago.

At the General Assembly, activists debated whether to move quickly, capitalizing on the attention the previous day's police actions had brought to their cause, or give themselves more time to organize. "I support a general strike right now to take advantage of this momentum,” said one speaker excitedly at the “people's mic” that evening. “We should strike while the iron's hot!" The sentiment was greeted by raucous applause, and the resolution passed shortly afterward.

Wednesday, November 2, was the date chosen. The strike, said activist Louise Michel at an October 31 press conference, was spurred “by a need to end police attacks on our communities, to defend our schools and libraries against closures, and against this economic system.” The occupiers, Michel continued, called for “a day of action in which the circulation of capital is blockaded, students walk out of their schools and people stage various occupations” around the city. The activists vowed to protest any businesses that keep their doors open during the strike.

They also planned to shut down the Port of Oakland, the fifth busiest container port in the United States and the scene of violent clashes between labor activists and police during the 2003 anti-war protests.

With only five short days to organize a city-wide action, the logistics appeared daunting. Since the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947, unions have been legally barred from officially participating in strikes “in support of other workers” – general strikes have been effectively illegal since then. (Interestingly, the last general strike in the U.S. occurred in Oakland, California, in 1946. Its epicenter, on the corner of Broadway and Telegraph, was just blocks away from Occupy Oakland's current “camp” in front of City Hall.)

But in those five days, an enormous amount of momentum has built up behind the action. SEIU, UAW, the Alameda Labor Council – an umbrella group representing over 100 local unions – and several other locals, including two area teachers' unions, endorsed the strike, coming as close to officially participating in the event as legally possible.

According to the Oakland Police Officers' Association, Oakland Mayor Jean Quan “issued a memo on Friday, October 28th to all City workers in support of the 'Stop Work' strike scheduled for Wednesday, giving all employees, except for police officers, permission to take the day off.” All Oakland police officers, on the other hand, have been ordered to work today – vacations and days off have been canceled.

Occupations in cities around the country are staging various “solidarity events” with today's march, and are also helping spread the word within their own networks. The whole world, it seems, will be watching to see if a relatively small group of dedicated activists can pull off a difficult feat and bring the economy of California's eighth largest city to a grinding halt.

If they do, it will represent a dramatic escalation of the Occupy Movement's tactics to date. A general strike is the most potent shot that can be fired across the bow of “the 1 percent.”

A success today will provide a unique opportunity to drive home the movement's message. In the age-old struggle between labor and capital, the latter has clearly won – we now have the highest share of the nation's income going to corporate profits and the lowest share to working people's wages since the Great Depression. The right claims, with endless repetition, that the richest Americans are “wealth creators.” By abstaining from work – and from shopping – the working people of Oakland have an opportunity to prove that capital without labor produces nothing at all.

you can check out the rest of the article on the link below. This is a great source of news.

“The banks got bailed out while we got sold out” is a chant that's become ubiquitous at Occupy actions across the country. The banks got showered with cash and loan guarantees because they were deemed “too big too fail” – their demise, we were told, would spread throughout the entire economy. Occupy Oakland took a big gamble trying to get a broad general strike together with very little time to organize, but if successful, they might also drive home the reality that “the other 99 percent” are also too big to fail – that our economy can't function without a healthy, educated and economically secure workforce. Stay tuned.

http://www.alternet.org/occupywallst/152936/occupy_oakland_attempts_to_shut_down_city_with_america%27s_first_general_strike_in_65_years/

18 Comments

18 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by EndTheFedNow (692) 12 years ago

OWS hijacked by big labor and totally diverted from the original purpose - doing something about the corruption of the Financial International (of which Wall St is but a part).

[-] 1 points by HitGirl (2263) 12 years ago

Is there a demand or is this just a show of force?

[-] 1 points by mserfas (652) from Ashland, PA 12 years ago

What's interesting is that back in July Oakland made a list of 44 crimes they wouldn't dispatch police officers for after a 911 call, including grand theft and burglary (see http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Suffer-These-Crimes-in-Oakland-Dont-Call-the-Cops-98266509.html ). Unfortunately it appears that camping in the city park was not on the list!

[-] 0 points by jay1975 (428) 12 years ago

Best quote from the AP: "Hundreds of protesters took to the streets of downtown Oakland on Wednesday, blocking a major intersection in what they called a general strike to protest economic conditions and police brutality in the city.

But despite appeals by Occupy Oakland organizers to "shut down" the Bay Area city, commerce appeared to largely carry on as usual in the morning, with most businesses remaining open and workers going off to their jobs."

[-] 0 points by Frankie (733) 12 years ago

Or not...

lol

[-] 0 points by hahaha (-41) 12 years ago

San Jose Mercury News, report about a half hour old now, says 'hundreds of protesters', 40 of 325 longshoremen didn't report today, port is open as usual. Cranes, ships, trucks.

A suit store and a theater didn't open.

[-] 0 points by jay1975 (428) 12 years ago

So the people who are not at work because they are in a park protesting will not be at work since they will be "on strike" and that will somehow make a difference. These childish tactics that OWS want to employ will accomplish nothing. Remember, remember, nothing will change on the 5th of November.

[-] 0 points by Jimboiam (812) 12 years ago

Yes yes. Call for the 99%ers to walk off their jobs, and sacrifice a days pay that they need for their families to achieve what? Some of them will be fired for taking a position against the company that they work for. Small businesses will be able to find plenty of other people to do their jobs.

This has to be the most ridiculous idea of all for the OWS. The only people who will suffer are the 99%. I am willing to bet this stunt will not achieve anything, and there will be very low support.

[-] 1 points by DonQuijote (55) from West Springfield, MA 12 years ago

You are right. I can only hope that people are in a cross road. It's them and their conscience what they decide to do.

[-] 0 points by dantes44 (431) from Alexandria, VA 12 years ago

What if it fails? Will OWS admit that it is powerless?

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

it's not

[-] 0 points by dantes44 (431) from Alexandria, VA 12 years ago

Ummm, sure looks like it is.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

what now ?

[-] 0 points by dantes44 (431) from Alexandria, VA 12 years ago

What do you mean? The docks are open and running as normal.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

what's OWS next move ?

[-] 0 points by dantes44 (431) from Alexandria, VA 12 years ago

Oh ok. Thanks for clarifying. No idea what's next.

[-] 1 points by DonQuijote (55) from West Springfield, MA 12 years ago

I don't know.