Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: “Occupy” Is A Sophisticated Operation: The 1% Global Elite Are Organizing, Directing And Funding Operation Behind The Scenes.

Posted 1 year ago on May 6, 2012, 4:01 p.m. EST by Reneye (118)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

With Precision The 1% Global Elite Are Organizing, Directing And Funding The Operation Behind The Scenes.

"To call the Occupy Movement a “movement” is to do it an injustice. We have found that it is an operation launched by the very same people who should be the actual targets of the protesters. Instead, it is the one percent global elite who are organizing, directing, and funding the operation behind the scenes. Their purpose is to create chaos and deflect the blame away from the actual financial terrorists to targets of lesser importance.

Based on our investigative findings, we have arrived at a very startling and irrefutable conclusion. We are witnessing the orchestrated destruction of America. Soon, in the streets of the U.S., we will see some of the most violent events in modern history take place, likely to result in the implementation of public curfews, restrictions on travel, and possibly even Martial Law. That appears to be the plan. It is not a new plan, but one that has been in the works since the early twentieth century. We have created an in-depth report that reveals the individuals and groups behind these events, their motives, tactics and methods. The following is a summary of that report and our investigative findings."

Full and revealing article......

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/44455

66 Comments

66 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by shadz66 (17663) 1 year ago

WTF Reneye ?!!! Has your moniker been usurped again ?!! Did you even read this paranoid rightwing hogwash before posting it ?!

You post this intricate drivel from the "Canada Freepost" whose banner goes on to read "... because without America there is no free world" ! Encore, WTF Reneye ?!! Consider, the problem with reading every possible conspiracy site is that eventually one can become unable to tell shit from shinola !!!

Are we to subscribe to the notion that no 'bottom up' mass movement is possible without 0.01%er approval & manipulation ? Every foaming at the mouth, limp-dick, rightwing retard is going to foam further and achieve a rare erection at your post.

'Occupy' IS a threat to the 0.01% and this is how they are reacting :

In a word Ren - 'disappointing' :-(

multum in parvo ...

[-] 3 points by beautifulworld (20414) 1 year ago

I have to agree with you, Shadz. This post is absolutely ridiculous and very disappointing. Makes me wonder.

[-] 3 points by GypsyKing (9727) 1 year ago

The above comment has been subjected to concentrated down-voting, yet another sleezy tactic of the trolls on this forum. They also upvote certain comments in the same manner, using multiple user names, to give their "ideas" the appearance of more interest than they really generate.

I think we should all know that this is happeneing.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

I vote to rearrange content in threads

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (9727) 1 year ago

I think this is an issue that needs more attention. It is a stealth way of taking over the forum, that seems to be gaining traction.

[-] 1 points by gnomunny (5647) from St Louis, MO 1 year ago

Agreed. Never been a fan of it anyway.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

I'm not afraid to use my own boots

[-] 0 points by Reneye (118) 1 year ago

Holy mack Shadz! So defensive! I sure got blasted for this one. Granted the article lacks sources, but I liked it in the sense that it consolidated into one article, many talking points that I have seen individually in other articles.

Sorry to disappoint, but I'm not introducing anything new here. Its quite well known that OWS was not a spontaneous movement, and there are people with motives behind it. The elite globalists are notorious for creating chaos all over the world to achieve their ultimate goal. Thats how they gain control over areas, by funding both sides of an issue, a war, a protest, etc. Their slogan is after all, "order out of chaos". We can't be so naive as to think that governments don't betray their own people. Democide has happened throughout history. Governments conspiring against their own people is inextricably woven into history since time emmemorial. Nor can we be so naive as to think that the majority of the advanced world 'all' decided to protest against their governments 'simultaneously'. That's just silly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9jOxERtkwN4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1CLfP5u3_JA

http://theintelhub.com/2011/10/12/occupy-wall-street-march-on-millionaires-ho...

http://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-progressive-groups-unite-around-occup...

http://theintelhub.com/2011/10/12/the-people-who-organized-the-%E2%80%9Coccup...

When I came back in the office today and saw the absolutely VISCERAL response to this post, I thought "holy shit...they're freakin' out...I've gotta pull this thread". I stepped away from it for a bit and realized, no, clearly this needs to be addressed.

We've all worked very hard here since last year, to come up with good ideas on how to get America back on track. Some people are here full time, putting in countless hours into what they believe is an authentic meeting of the minds to do some good in this world. Certainly no-one wants to hear that perhaps reality may indeed be different than they thought, or worse, that all their hard work is for naught. The clear response to someone suggesting this, is anger. Anger from "fear".....that maybe we're being manipulated....or used...or whatever, and can't do jack about it. Please don't take my questioning whether OWS has a noble intent, with questioning if "you all" have a noble intent. You took this too personally.

Not questioning the agenda of this website/OWS is like being told not to question our government. They scream "You're not a patriot". It is ABSOLUTELY patriotic to be questioning politicians and 'people in charge' if they have their country's and people's best interest at heart. I'd like America, no...North America, no....the whole world to be a just and free world, and that will never happen by blindly waving the red, white and blue....HOPING everyone wants the same things that most normal people do.

I am, by no means, saying that a population cannot come together in solidarity and rise up against its government without the .01% orchestrating it. I'm not quite sure how you came to the conclusion that I thought otherwise. Although......I do think many people here would rather continue what they are doing here, despite much evidence that suggests that OWS has elite hands all over it and was not a spontaneous act, than acknowledge that maybe this isn't what we thought it was.....that maybe we should move on to something else. Take this website for instance. It seems very obvious to me, given how threads on this website aren't organized into categories and archived, but left to disappear into oblivion, that it is purposely geared to put some very bright, intelligent, creative ideas from a world of people in the trash heap....never to be seen again. Why??? Aren't we supposed to be gathering solutions? I've been consistently amazed at just how intelligent regular everyday folk are that have come here with one great idea after another. Where are they??? I can't look them up, can you? You of all people Shadz....think of the staggering amount of information you have researched, amassed and posted on this forum. One day, and for all intended purposes, its gone. There's a new business for ya Shadz. You can start our new permanent global social hub where we don't have to worry about who owns it. I elect you.

Do I believe that OWS is having an impact on the .01% ? Of course I do !! I wouldn't be here otherwise. Having said that, I truly do feel that OWS is a global elite set up. Most governments and ruling elite, by nature want to control EVERYTHING. They do want to govern by socialism, and their version of socialism, I can guarantee you, is far different than what you and I envision socialism to be. And what better way to usher in socialism than by the people themselves yelling about inequality, etc. We will eventully, in my opinion, vote in our own oppressors. They'll tell us whatever pretty things we want to hear to get into positions of power. "Global governance", "New World Order"..."Collectivism"...whatever you want to call it...these things aren't considered conspiracy theory anymore. These things are talked about openly now...even on MSM. How long are we going to ignore this issue?

My wish, is that we hijack OWS from the elite and use their own tool against them. At the moment, I feel like we are playing right into their hands by continuing with the status quo of firing in all directions. I wish we could show our solidarity to what I believe is the root problem. Many people think the root problem is getting money out of politics, career politicians, ending the fed, etc. They're all good things to work on, to be sure. However, focusing on these things is tantamount to focusing on middle management. If the owner of a McDonalds had 'cooked the books' so badly that they got caught and the place had to close and the employees lost their jobs, would you go after the manager who had nothing to do with keeping the books? Of course not. The owners should be named and brought to justice. That's where I think OWS is missing the mark.

Here's an example; The world is shouting about CISPA right now. That's a noble thing to be protesting about, no doubt. There's been all kinds of calls to sign petitions, signs touting 'STOP CISPA', and on and on. We acheive small successes as with SOPA and PIPA, they quiet down for a while, repackage it and come at us again with something even worse. Here's the question; Does anyone even know that the brainchild of the maniacal "total internet control" is the megalomaniac .01% ruling elite Jay Rockefeller? WHY aren't we focusing on naming and exposing him for this? It won't matter if we manage to thwart CISPA, because Jay Rockefeller is STILL THERE, gearing up to throw another one at us two months later. Slap his name on a few thousand cardboard signs and see if he doesn't crawl back into the shadows. How long do you think he would survive out there in the real world? He would be stopped in the street by every person who saw him and told to go take a flying fuck. Now there's pressure. He can't hide any more. By not naming the people responsible at the very tippy top...my fear is that we're spinning our wheels. I don't want the history of 'occupy' to be hollow....that all 'occupy' did was keep alot of people occupied for a while.

If we take OWS back from the oligarchs and use it to name them personally, this uprising will have backfired on them. They do their best to stay out of the headlines. The one thing that scares them the most is being personally named in connection with the criminal acts that they have inflicted on humanity....and the crimes have been brutal and ongoing. Name them and they won't have this stranglehold on us for much longer. I also think that OWS is shortsighted about the reach of this movement and should move to thinking past its own US borders. I think it is imperative that we recognize the "global cast" of characters who have/are doing this to us. They are not necessarily the people you would recognize as people who rule the USA. The "Committee of 300" is a good place to start for names of the .01% ruling elite.

Just a few of the NWO globalist quotes :

"The people will be crushed under the burden of taxes, loan after loan will be floated; after having drained the present, the State will devour the future." Fredric Bastiat

"The 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault." Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

"The truth of the matter is that you do have those standby provisions, and the statutory emergency plans are there whereby you could, in the name of stopping terrorism, apprehend, invoke the military, and arrest Americans and hold them in detention camps." U.S. Representative Henry Gonzalez, August 29, 1994

"Naturally the common people don't want war. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." Hermann Goering, President of the Reichstag, Nazi Party, and Luftwaffe Commander in Chief.

I hope I've clarified some of my thoughts Shadz. I would just hate to part company with you. Should I be slapped upside the head for an article with no sources? Well....ok...perhaps. But I still stand by the content of the article. I hope we're ok.

[+] -5 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

Neither the article nor Reneye said, nor even suggested that a bottom up mass movement is not possible without 0.01% approval and manipulation. That is pure propaganda on your part.

The article is saying that OWS is no such movement.

Oh, and just say the phrase "Tea Party movement" and every leftist I know will demand that you "subscribe to the notion that no "bottom up" mass movement is possible without 0.01%er approval & manipulation.

[-] 3 points by beautifulworld (20414) 1 year ago

Propaganda? What are you talking about? You don't understand allusion?

This article is pure b.s. There isn't one shred of evidence, because it simply is not true.

And, of course this thread should be removed. This forum tolerates enough nonsense, but these lies are intolerable.

[-] 3 points by francismjenkins (3713) 1 year ago

Wow, how did a crack head manage to put enough words in proper sequential order, to create sentences and paragraphs?

Hey how about this .... you guys can have anyone retarded enough to believe that article :)

[-] 3 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Alien autopsy - what else is being hidden at area 51? Inquiring minds want to know.

[-] 3 points by notaneoliberal (2269) 1 year ago

Sorry, it says nothing. It talks about an investigation, but presents no evidence of anything. Most ows supporters already know Obama is in support of the elites. At least many of them do. What has been exposed here that we don't already know?

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

I thought that this blatant BS troll post would have been deleted by now. But for whatever reason it still exists.

Well then. Imagine my surprise - that troll shit is allowed to be spewed. What a devious and sly operators these 1% must be to allow this type of attack on their secret machinations.

What sly bastards too the 1% are to attack their own interests and stir up public unrest over the shit they are pulling.

What masterful subtle genius to shine the light on ALEC and it's program of attacking the public.

What will these geniuses come up with next?

Inquiring minds want to know.

[-] 2 points by bigbangbilly (594) 1 year ago

Even if true we get to do the ultimate bite the feeder's hands off.

[-] 2 points by stevebol (1170) from Milwaukee, WI 1 year ago

Exactly.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (9727) 1 year ago

I have one word for this post: Bullshit!

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (20414) 1 year ago

Absolutely.

[-] 2 points by shooz (26670) 1 year ago

Giggle, giggle. The Canadian version of Weekly World News, with a heavy dose of FLAKESnews.

It really does need more Bigfoot, or a big dose of Soros

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Alien autopsy - what did Cheney and friends really do while out hunting?

Inquiring minds want to know.

[-] 2 points by shooz (26670) 1 year ago

OWS is secretly funded by Bat Boy and Bilderberg Group.

It had to happen

[-] 3 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

I thought it was a link-up between Cobra & Chaos.

Better get Scarlet and 99 on it.

Damn unsecured link-up.

Cone of silence!!!!

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

I sometimes feel finnance crimes deflect attention away from war crimes when force become necessary to complete financial take overs

[-] 0 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

I sometimes feel every OWS post is intended to deflect attention away from the fact that this country is under attack by something far more evil and destructive than any war machine could ever be.

[-] 0 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 1 year ago

More evil than the war machine? Tell that to my friend's dad that grew up in London during WWII.

[-] 1 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

War machines destroy buildings, and injure/kill human beings. Indeed evil and destructive. But I consider the things that destroy societies, morals, and the human spirit worse by far. I am of course posting under the assumption that a difference of perspective and opinion can still be expressed here.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by friendlyopposition (574) 1 year ago

hahahaha... Reneye really got blasted on this one. That was fun!

[-] -2 points by Hades (-13) 1 year ago

Apparently you hit one hell of a nerve Mr. Reneye.

[-] -2 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

You can always tell when it happens because instead of providing any facts to the contrary, they engage in the adult version of playground bullying-ad hominem attacks.

[-] 3 points by GypsyKing (9727) 1 year ago

How do you prove a negative, dipshitz?

[-] 0 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

Assume for a moment that it is true that a negative statement cannot be proven - since this very rule itself is a negative, how can we ever hope to prove that it's true? The principle is in violation of the Law of Non-Contradiction, which says a thing cannot be both true and false at the same time; that no logical statement can contradict itself. In practice, such a situation is called a paradox, and is automatically false. If the statement 'you can't prove a negative' were ever proven true, it would have to apply to itself, making itself false.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (9727) 1 year ago

I thought they were having the trolls hit the logic books. Great concept, study logic so that you can use literally every logical fallacy in the book.

[Removed]

[-] -2 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

18 minutes and counting. I wonder how long this will be allowed to remain on this website.

[-] 1 points by ikki6 (11) 1 year ago

i got to read it before it is removed :D

and if it is removed, just report :D

[-] -1 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

Report it to whom? The people who remove it? :)

[-] -3 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

The article isn't about Obama. It's about the fact that OWS was and is organized, funded, and directed by the very elites that it claims to abhor. OWS is a Trojan Horse.

If the protestors don't "already know that"-they are merely the most recent useful idiots/tools to be recruited by the elite. They serve a specific purpose and are expendable when/if that agenda is completed.

If they DO know that already, then they are colluding with the elite to orchestrate the destruction of America-which makes them just as evil and vile as domestic terrorists.

Either way-OWS is being exposed more and more every day.

[-] 4 points by notaneoliberal (2269) 1 year ago

So the global elites are organizing an organization protesting the global elites. The article makes a lot of assertions but provides nothing else. By the way, globalists are NOT applying Keynesian economics. Anyone with any knowledge of Keynesian economics would know this.

[-] 5 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

I got a little today

Keynes believes the economy should be funded from the bottom

which means the lower population needs money to spend

I think

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

I think that is a good idea but have my doubts about whether he really believed that. He also liked the idea of a private federal reserve, which many protestors of today recognize as the root of our problem.

The alternative would be a public national bank, which I believe is what FDR really intended, despite his association with Keynes.

Private banks are used to create financial bubbles, like the mortgage crisis, public banks are used for infrastructure development, like FDR's New Deal. Though he didn't start a public bank exactly, that was his direction.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

well

he may not have wanted to scrub floors to get the general populous money

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

Well, because of his positive attitude towards private bankers, some would consider him a neo-colonialist.

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

can we just Matrix this Neo thing ?

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

Yes, something like that.

[-] 1 points by notaneoliberal (2269) 1 year ago

Exactly.

[-] 3 points by GypsyKing (9727) 1 year ago

That first line says it all . . . whacko!

This is just manure from the counter-intelligence funny farm.

[-] 0 points by Craiggiedangit (99) 1 year ago

Elites love to be hated. They realize nothing will happen from your hatred, they are trying to get you to rally behind half of their puppets in Washington to give them more power.

[-] 1 points by notaneoliberal (2269) 1 year ago

"Elites love to be hated." Well, I don't know about that. Sounds like another assertion without evidence. Whether elites love to be hated or not, the politicians running for office (who support the goals of those elites) probably don't.

[-] 0 points by Craiggiedangit (99) 1 year ago

It is an opinion, not something that can be refuted or proven with evidence. Which elites? Hated how? It cannot be proven or dis-proven.

Of course the politicians don't want to be hated. That is their bonus money from the elites; the chance to win an election and represent the elites. The two-party system is merely a redundancy, people tend to blame parties. When there is sufficient anger at one of the parties, they switch off to the other and everything keeps going like normal.

[-] 2 points by notaneoliberal (2269) 1 year ago

There is some truth in what you say. The two parties are far more of a redundancy than I would like.

[-] 2 points by Craiggiedangit (99) 1 year ago

The two party system is nothing more than a sophisticated game of good cop, bad cop. Politicians are just well paid actors, hired to placate the public and say the right things.

Did you see John Boehner and Joe Biden talking about golf on the floor of Congress when they thought the microphones were off? The weren't two desperate political rivals, they were people who completely understood each other and the jobs they were both hired to do. If either of them actually believed half of the vitriol their respective partisan ideologues spew out, they would hate each other so much they likely would have gotten into a fistfight, not held a friendly conversation about golf.

[-] 2 points by notaneoliberal (2269) 1 year ago

Yeah, the "friendly opposition" is way to friendly.

[-] -2 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

"By the way, globalists are NOT applying Keynesian economics. Anyone with any knowledge of Keynesian economics would know this."

Oh please enlighten us on both Keynesian economics AND whatever it is that the globalists are applying.

[-] 2 points by notaneoliberal (2269) 1 year ago

The current economic system in place in most of the world is neoliberalism. Neoliberalism is the revival of a version of the Laissez faire, liberal, free market ideology that prevailed (and caused) the great depression. If you legitimately want to understand Keynesian economics, I suggest you do a little reading. The wiki link below is a good start. If you really want to educate yourself, read The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Keynes was the antithesis of the current economic system in many ways. Keynes did not, for instance, see "top down" stimulus as a very effective way to fight a recession, but recommended bottom up. Keynes cautioned against the danger of a massive trade deficit, ie the result of "free trade", and described it as 'leakage". Also here's a link to explain what neoliberalim is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376

[-] -1 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

First off, let's actually go to what the article SAID-instead of relying on your interpretation of it-

"Keynesian economics, which advocate a strong government role in private commerce and a favorite of globalists, is the current economic model in use by this administration. The path was also paved by such bipartisan financial initiatives as NAFTA, the SPP and the like."

Now for some history regarding Keynesian policies- http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/aboutfdr/budget.html

And here's an NPR article that explains how much Keynes LOVED stimulus plans. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129031780

[-] 1 points by notaneoliberal (2269) 1 year ago

My interpretation of; "Keynesian economics....and a favorite of globalists is the current economic model in use by this administration." is that this article is contending that Keynesian economics are being deployed by globalists and the current administration (which last I heard, was the Obama administration). So what part did I misinterpret? I went on to state that that was not in fact true. Ironically, the links you provided (especially the first) present a pretty good defense of Keynes. Did you even read them yourself ? I did read the links you provided, but I have to question whether you read those I provided to you.

[-] 3 points by gnomunny (5647) from St Louis, MO 1 year ago

Just curious, did you even read the article? There is not one iota of evidence of anything alluded to in the title. Nothing. Not one single fact.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (9727) 1 year ago

You are the first person here to mention Obama, you little mind-fucker.

[-] -2 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

Really? All one has to do is look at the time stamps to put the posts here in chronological order. Dipshitz.

[-] 1 points by notaneoliberal (1234) 5 hours ago

Sorry, it says nothing. It talks about an investigation, but presents no evidence of anything. Most ows supporters already know Obama is in support of the elites. At least many of them do. What has been exposed here that we don't already know? ↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

To which I replied: [-] 2 points by BetsyRoss (-44) from New Hope, PA 5 hours ago

The article isn't about Obama. It's about the fact that OWS was and is organized, funded, and directed by the very elites that it claims to abhor. OWS is a Trojan Horse.

If the protestors don't "already know that"-they are merely the most recent useful idiots/tools to be recruited by the elite. They serve a specific purpose and are expendable when/if that agenda is completed.

If they DO know that already, then they are colluding with the elite to orchestrate the destruction of America-which makes them just as evil and vile as domestic terrorists.

Either way-OWS is being exposed more and more every day. ↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply edit delete permalink

Because certain posts were "upvoted" now the entire thread is out of sequence. Your inability to see what is right in front of you is why you think that a response I clearly made "5 hours ago"-to the actual first person here to mention OBAMA-could possibly have been made to a comment posted only 4 hours ago.

Unless you think I'm a freaking prophet....I'd like to suggest you are the one whose mind isn't quite stable.

[-] -1 points by GypsyKing (9727) 1 year ago

I'd like to state the obvious here. You don't even exist, except as one of the multipile usernames of a few people paid to subvert this site, and everybody knows it. Now, what we need to do is figure out how to cleanse you from this site permanently.

[-] 3 points by francismjenkins (3713) 1 year ago

Indeed .... but conservotrolls are funny sometimes. Conspiracy theories only a crack head could dream up, rambling in incoherent drivel (I assume salivating on themselves while doing so) ... goes to show, many Americans are just borderline retarded (I mean, literally) :)

[-] 0 points by Reneye (118) 1 year ago

Thanks for the support BetsyRoss. You're very astute. I'm not saying it is absolutely is a Trojan Horse. I''m saying it is a definite possibility, and we ought to be very careful and alert. Thanks again for your support despite my getting blasted over this one! Haha!

[-] -3 points by cooperbl (-88) 1 year ago

Well done, betsy.

[-] -3 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 1 year ago

It appears that your freedom of expression and alternative viewpoints are as welcome here as mine have been.

[-] -3 points by cooperbl (-88) 1 year ago

dont you know by now that you and and everyone else has freedom of speech on here, as long as you agree with " them".

[-] 1 points by francismjenkins (3713) 1 year ago

Waaaa, someone pass this man a tissue :)

[Removed]