Forum Post: Occupy Debate!
Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 4, 2011, 1:45 p.m. EST by 420
(40)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I've been watching the GOP debates, and im not seeing any answers that specifically relate to our questions. If we want them to answer our questions we are just gonna have to occupy debate.
Well, Mitt Romney has already stated that corporations are people, too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2h8ujX6T0A
Occupy Wallstreet, not GOP.
Really?
What about this:
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/republicans-being-taught-talk-occupy-wall-street-133707949.html
Note: "I'm so scared of this anti-Wall Street effort. I'm frightened to death," said Frank Luntz, a Republican strategist and one of the nation's foremost experts on crafting the perfect political message. "They're having an impact on what the American people think of capitalism."
Frank. You are so right about that. The OWS will embrace anyone who will jail the banksters - all of them. We will happily be governed by anyone, who does what the 99% want. If not, we will protest again and again. We are leaderless and non political.
Really? Where did you first hear that we are leaderless and non-poilitcal, the #occupy Flin-Flon General Assembly?
It is in the Mission Statement.
Who produced the mission statement, me?
No. OWS did.
where was it produced? When was it published? Again, where and when did you first hear 'we' are leaderless and non political?
Additionally, here is the Adbusters statement which reiterates the position. "Again, where and when did you first hear 'we' are leaderless and non political?".
http://www.adbusters.org/campaigns/occupywallstreet
It is crystal clear, as is the Movement's goals and focus. Alles klar?
Where was it produced? New York.
When was it published? 30.09.2011
Again, where and when did you first hear 'we' are leaderless and non political? In the Mission Statement (attached)
http://devoutinfidel.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/occupy-wall-st-releases-their-mission-statement/
If I can correctly assume that by answering New York, you mean specifically the New York City General Assembly, which now represents oh, about 1% of protesters, then the NYCGA is de-facto LEADING the OWS movement and is responsible for declaring the movement non political. The movement has UNELECTED 'facilitators" running an 'official' website and issuing 'official' statements, and refusing to endorse an ELECTED National General Assembly because "we are leaderless and non political"
How convenient.
Good. I'm glad you finally got it. Leaderless. Non political.
Are these the non-leaders having a non-political discussion?
We shall see. Farewell
http://occupywallst.org/forum/occupy-movement-roundtable-discussion-featuring-da/