Forum Post: Obama Is Bush And The Terror Bullsh*t Proves It Once And For All
Posted 10 years ago on Aug. 2, 2013, 4:28 p.m. EST by itsmyblood
(10)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
do you feel the fear yet???? the terrorists are coming, the terrorists are coming.!!!!!!
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/02/politics/us-embassies-close/index.html
and now watch the peons scramble. fools we are al queda they are cia financed and controlled.
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/07/former-al-qaeda-operative-claims.html
Is this news to anyone at this point? Fronting for rebels, bombing rebels, paying rebels and disowning rebels.
Makes about as much sense as keeping our torture camp open and running because "theres not enough money to close it"... unreal.
Nothing creates profits like war and control.
You always have to be suspicious when a MSM rag like CNN quotes "unidentified sources" and "sources who wish to remain anonymous." And it's funny that the so-called 'target' of these alleged attacks are all countries our government has their eyes on. Also funny that this happens right on the heels of all this blow-back about the NSA spying debacle. Speaking of which, if they're able to track all global communications now, how come they haven't been able to pinpoint exactly who and where this supposed attack is originating?
Call me a skeptic, but be prepared for the next US false-flag.
This story is the headline on every news network website. Either someone is acting as a fear monger, or there really is a threat. I think there's a real threat.and therefore am glad they are being proactive. I mean we don't want another embassy massacre. Better safe than sorry.
It's always better to be safe than sorry. But how come they're waiting to close the embassies till Sunday? And there's still a lot of unanswered questions about the last embassy massacre. I'm not saying it's not legit this time, but I don't trust these fuckers, Narley. They have no problem with 'collateral damage' if it furthers their globalist aims.
Your mistrust is justified. But it's probably a good idea that they not give out details. It's understandable. It could jeopardize lives. So, for now I'm taking a wait and see attitude. What choice do I have?
Unfortunately, that's all we can do is wait and see. But I'd still like to know why, if they're monitoring every bit of communication on the planet, they don't already know who and where these people are? I mean, that's the whole point of all these worldwide NSA surveillance programs after all.
Time will tell.
grow a set of balls and wear them up front. that is a choice you can make. or you know cower in fear like a good pleb.
OK, I have balls, and I wear them up front. Now what in the hell are you talking about?
na bro if you have nuts they are most certainly tucked.
[Removed]
not really into burning books whatever their origin. but apparently you are not into reality. all you obama apologists are the same. he is a fraud and a crook same as bush. you are a scared little dog doing exactly what they tell you.
[Removed]
no i am a revolutionary who follows his moral compass.
Moral relativity is one of the problems. Real revolution should be based of conviction, not whether you just don’t like something.