Posted 3 years ago on Jan. 18, 2012, 4:37 a.m. EST by ProfitOverPeople
from Châtillon, IdF
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
See the interview where Chomsky discusses this below:
1.Do you agree with Chomsky that there "are no limits to what reform can accomplish" or do you believe that the only way to change the system is to eliminate the powerful forces at play, which would mean revolution. Are even anywhere near of making revolution? Removing these forces from the game would require a change in the institutions that shape our government. OR - do you think that continual reform would eventually be called a revolution because it would, over time, change the institutional structure of government.
- What do you think about the way Chomsky answers the question about human nature?