Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Mitt Romney’s father was born in Mexico, but claims he’s an American citizen, where was Mitt really born?

Posted 2 years ago on March 1, 2012, 8:03 a.m. EST by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Mitt claims he was born in Michigan, but I’ve never seen his birth certificate. We do know his father was Mexican born, and he believes in a religion where you can pluck a persons soul from one place and stick it in another without their permission.

I wonder what all we don’t know about Mitt?

124 Comments

124 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 10 points by XenuLives (1645) from Charlotte, NC 2 years ago

I demand to see Romney's birth certificate!

LOL

[-] 2 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 2 years ago

Can someone who was bolted and soldered together have a birth certificate? I thought those certificates were only issued to humans.

[+] -4 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Certificate of Manufacture?

[-] 3 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 2 years ago

Serial number, maybe.

But when it's malfunctioning there is no customer support.

[+] -5 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Outsourced to India. Try calling the Koch HQ.

[-] 2 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 2 years ago

If ONLY Romney could be outsourced along with the other goose-stepping morons. Problem is, no one in the world would want them. And dumping them in a land fill would just create another Super Fund site; dumping toxins like that is environmentally irresponsible.

[+] -4 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

And just how would one go about attempting to recycle?

Maybe a nuclear waste storage facility?

[-] 2 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 2 years ago

They can't be recycled. (Although they themselves simply recycle debunked distortions false myths.) They contain too many preservatives aimed to keep them perpetually alive in 1953.

[-] -3 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

New use for space exploration? Put em in a container and chuck it at the Sun?

[-] 2 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 2 years ago

That's probably the best solution. That is if the Sun itself doesn't spit them back out.

[+] -4 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

(laughing) wouldn't want to risk destableizing the sun.

Perhaps put the container on a coarse to take it out of the system. Making sure to mark it in every conceivable language form as containing contents that are extremely toxic and hazardous to all known life.

You know in case it turns out that we are not alone in the universe.

[-] 2 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 2 years ago

I'm going to stop here, since, as much fun as this is, it can really go on forever. (As in, those aliens - would they be illegal aliens? - would be smart enough to sent the package back to us.)

Oh, damn. I really did just continue this, didn't I?

[+] -4 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Itsalright, way to much material and a burning desire to share it. Stop by my post on disaster and emergency.

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

To me really he looks more Russian than American, I mean I don’t know, I’m just asking.

[-] 1 points by craigdangit (326) 2 years ago

I agree, I think you should have to provide proof of natural birth to run for the presidency, it is a requirement after all.

[-] 0 points by JuanFenito (847) 2 years ago

Don't be stupid. A quick glance is enough for me!

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (21783) 2 years ago

http://alldeadmormonsarenowgay.com/

You can convert his father.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Do you have to be like a true believer to make it work?

Maybe we should convert his sons instead.......I'm just kidding.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (21783) 2 years ago

Mormons convert dead people because they firmly believe that if those people were alive today then they would have joined the one true religion. Never mind if the people they were converting had died before Joseph Smith was born.

So, they have to be dead........and there are no take backs! :D

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

or like his father in law who till his dying day said, don't do this to me....

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (21783) 2 years ago

Yeah.

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 2 years ago

actually doing the ordination work in preparation for them to receive the gospel in the spirit world isnt plucking their soul.

1 Peter 4:6 For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit. This scripture mentions the preaching, but the ordinations must also be performed for those who have not yet received them.

1 cor 15:29 Else what shall they do which are baptized FOR the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized FOR the dead? (not many people believe or act upon this scripture, except those who have the authority given them by Christ who he himself, along with the father appeared to them and afterward sent angels to ordain men giving them power and authority to perform the ordinances. (Funny I dont hear about any christian pastors who had the father and the son appear to them, let alone Peter, James, and John, lay their hands upon their head and give them the authority of the Melchizedek Priesthood of God. Nope, not a one.)

When the dead get to the other side and discover the hinderance the devil placed before them, then shall they have opportunity again to receive the fullness of the gospel of Christ, including the more sure parts.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

So your idea of freedom of religion is freedom to force people into your religion, assuming you believe that afterlife stuff in the first place.

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 2 years ago

actually by that scripture in 1 peter 4:6 if the gospel is preached to them that are dead, then they have opportunity to receive or reject the fathers plan for us. Its kind of like, do you want to receive all the father has including an inheritance in the kinddom? If not then youll have to go into outer darkness, because He owns the universe and all the earths in it. Ha

its too bad though when people dont believe in our eternal family. Its almost better for them to have never been born than for them to waste the days of their probation.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

WOW do you know this much about Greek mythology too?

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 2 years ago

.

Once Octavious is the sole general in Rome, Marc Anthony is his only Rival, So Octavius rallies Rome against Marc because Marc had willed his inheritance to non-Romans, his Egypt born children. And that is how Octavius became sole Emperor of Rome.

Quote:

you know Antony lost it

while loving in Egypt

('Cause Rome was fascist baby!)

the cost for su-icide romance

He read Mark's will to the public forum

Antony's heirs were born foreign

Octavius used this as a means to an end

to preside over all Rome province

so control of Rome would now be honed

by one Emperor's hands

Octavius alone would own the shores

on the Mediterranean

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Thanks Matt it does always come to that, power ends up in one person’s hands, if there is nothing to prevent it.

I hope that we can talk our way through this, figure out a way to get the best thing done, I think a lot of people see the problem, if we stick to that we should be ok.

[-] 1 points by nucleus (3291) 2 years ago

That explains the outsourcing ... helping his fellow countrymen south of the border.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

When he was running Bane? Hmmm that could be too true to be talking about in here.

[-] 1 points by francismjenkins (3713) 2 years ago

Oh no ... here we go again

LOL!

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

This is from father down but it may be worst than we thought.

All I’m doing is asking questions, like do think Mitt might be a Russian mole? I mean it would be the perfect way to get one in, parents born outside the country, just some papers saying that they are American, we know how easy it is to fake those, you slip them in, have a kid then if you can’t get the first one to the White House, you got a backup ready to go.

[-] 1 points by francismjenkins (3713) 2 years ago

Okay, I mean if it sticks ... great. I'm not voting for Romney anyway (so I don't give a shit where he was born, although I will say, this tactic seems sort of far fetched and comical).

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Then you do get it ;).

Satire can be strong stuff if used in proper amounts.

[-] 1 points by francismjenkins (3713) 2 years ago

But of course .... we love satire (and the republican party is, if nothing else, comical, and deserving of as much mockery as we can muster, even if it's gratuitous) :)

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

I'm starting to wander if you aren't deliberately derailing productive conversation with fluff, misdirection, and party baiting. Or is it simply beyond your capacity to stay on topic?

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Yet so many others see how the curtain is being lifted, we're learning a bit about you too I think.

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

Yes, the mystery, who is richard. Uncovering the secret truth. Let me clear that up for you.

http://richardkentgates.com

http://blog.richardkentgates.com

http://ows.richardkentgates.com

http://citicommons.com

You want to play games? Be my guest. OWS has no party, get over it or move along.

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

So you post a site and you get to say what the message is? Why don't you go ahead and tell me why would we not defeat a Repulican if we can? Before you answert be sure and look at this.

http://occupywallst.org/forum/republicans-try-to-kill-public-financing-in-arizon/

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

It was vehemently opposed by only one Senator, Russ Feingold, who was the only Senator to vote against the bill.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_Act

no party is innocent


If you support the movement, including the 99%, you must accept you neighbor and stop bashing them with the actions of politicians. Otherwise you are cutting off your nose to spite your face. Some of this movements biggest supporters and brightest contributors are republicans. You do a disservice by making supporters or anyone for that matter, feel uncomfortable in taking part because they aren't of a certain party.

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

I never claimed innocence for anybody.

I welcome all Republicans willing to raise taxes on the wealthy problem is there are none. They cut them quick enough but refuse to see when they have gotten to low for the good of the country, sensible leaders know that you have to make adjustments in both directions not just one.

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

So we need to pay for Black Water? We should be paying for the research that would normally be paid for by the corporations that use the results? Because those things cost tax money and they are also programs supported by democrats. So your boss should pay more taxes instead of giving you a raise so that we may support private militias when we have our own military?

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

The perfect is the emeny of the good, make a case for why Republicans should be in office, tell me of the good they have done. Do you think that no one will be in office after Nov.?

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

How is it you think I should defend a politician? You are so wrapped up in labels you cannot separate from the hacks you see on TV from someone on this forum making minimum wage. THE TELEVISION IS NOT REALITY. If you can't separate the two, then your wasting my time and yours.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

OK just so I know, do you think people should vote or not?

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

Yes

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

ok then I'm cool, I have an opinion that it can be done to help us, I don't see why sharing that opinion is "trolling" I certainly want to get the money out and address wealth inequality, is that enough or are there other tests I have to pass?

[-] 0 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

lol, I wasn't calling you a troll. I'm not testing anyone. I am simply trying to make it uncomfortable for anyone to bring the disfunctionality of party politics into this forum. Most of us are average everyday people that want our fair share of what we work for. The movement is made up of democrats and republicans alike, and we all have an equal right to participate. Partisan bickering empowers politicians, not society. Unity, wages, and war are the few things I bring up.

[-] 3 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Ok so the "troll" comment is from the other thread we have been chatting in at the same time, I think you want to make it uncomfortable for anybody who wants to actully change the system.

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

you think observing the red team and blue team divide, is change?

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

Topic police!

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

Partisan and co-opt police. OWS has no party affiliation. I will not stand by while certain users alienate other supporters over party line bullshit. We are not here for the benefit of Obama or any politician or party.

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

Don't you dare stand by, I will be obeyed.

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 2 years ago

generic reply

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

Unduly noted.

[-] 1 points by engineer4 (272) 2 years ago

A persons religious belief should not be a reason to elect or not elect him/her to public office. One could poke holes in any religion if they wanted to. We should be asking if the person can actually lead us and will the people want to follow. Kenedy went through this nonsense about his religion. Religious freedom (and tolerance) in this country is quite special when comparing to a lot of other countries. A president can be religious if he/she wants to be, but still must be president for all the people and not just the ones that voted for him/her.

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Difference being Kennedy made a point of the fact that he would be guided by what was best for country, not his religion. Mitt says the opposite, he says it is a compromise of his beliefs to allow contraception for example. So if you run on the strength of your beliefs then we have a right to look at those beliefs.

[-] 1 points by LetsGetReal (1420) from Grants, NM 2 years ago

What is your source for Mitt's stance on contraception? This does not sound accurate. Mormons encourage having as many children as possible, but they do not prohibit use of contraceptives.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

update from today, I know it's hard to keep up with his positions:

http://www.thenation.com/blog/166555/romneys-contraception-flip-flop-reminds-everyone-why-they-hate-him

[-] 1 points by LetsGetReal (1420) from Grants, NM 2 years ago

LOL. How true!

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

OK I admit it, now I had been talking to some of the high score trolls, so I mistook your meaning earier, but yes when I posted I was taking a chance and figured I'd go go the long shoot for my "proof" since this was kind of toungue in cheek to start with. That's where the whole negitive proof came from, then later in the day he did this flip flop, so the proof came after the comment, if you read my posts you find me very truthful, all we have to do is tell the truth, and we win

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

For accuracy, I believe they advocate their members having as many children as possible, but would prefer that others would use total contraception. It hastens the takeover.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Hey Brighton good morning thanks for stopping by. Have you run into these trolls, Perspective and richardkentgates, they work together and use words straight from the right wing think tanks, you get to where you can hear a tone that always seems to be there it’s like a fingerprint. Anyway they got high numbers and a good story I’m sure they earn their money misleading people.

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

Thanks, and yes I have run into gates mostly. They try hard. I was just reading that the Koch's are taking back the Cato Institute, speaking of right wing think tanks.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

I hadn't seen that, thanks, I did see where they were worth about 20 billion each, I had thought it was around 2 to 3, these guys are a bigger threat than I thought.

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

Yes, some report about $25b each. They and their friends have pledged $100m for the presidential race, with $60m, coming from the Brothers, Koch.

I'm sure glad that the Supreme Court made it possible for those two boys to be heard. Why that mean old Congress was trying to put a cap on their speech at about $35,000, Everybody know that nobody can hear you now for that chump change. I have to admit that I personally contributed less than that and sure enough, nobody heard me.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

This is where the negative proves the point, he is locked in a polical battle with Santorum, who has said this, now Mitt has pointed out all the places where he disagrees with Mr. Santorum so it would follow that he agrees.

[-] 1 points by LetsGetReal (1420) from Grants, NM 2 years ago

Wow, sounds more like factsrsuperfluous talking.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Did I miss the add where Mitt attacked Santorum for saying this?

[-] 1 points by francismjenkins (3713) 2 years ago

Religious freedom also means the freedom to not vote for someone because they hold bizarre and/or theocratic religious views. We're not talking about passing a law that restricts qualification to run for office based on religious views (which would violate the First Amendment), we're talking about the freedom to vote for someone based on whatever factors we deem important. Therefore, if we decide we don't want to vote for a Mormon, because we think Mormonism is a bizarre religion, or we decide we don't like Santorum, because he's a theocratic douche bag (who probably wears a Knights Templar t-shirt when he's home alone), "religious freedom" is NOT implicated.

[-] 2 points by engineer4 (272) 2 years ago

Unfortunately, the same could be said for color of skin, short, tall, pretty or ugly. We have the freedom to choose, but we should also choose wisely for the right reasons. There will never be a perfect candidate. I noticed that you chose to be critical of the right and not the left. Are you critical of only certain religions of certain people or all religions of all people?

[-] 1 points by francismjenkins (3713) 2 years ago

I mean, I'm very secular, but I don't really have the luxury of being critical of all religious views (or else, I wouldn't be able to vote for anyone). However, yes, I think certain religions are crazier than others, and even with the benign sort of harmless religions, you still have your kooks. Moreover, religion is NOT like race. You choose to be religious, whereas race is genetic. As for the right/left thing, yes, I'm more critical of the right, but I'm also critical of the left in some aspects.

[-] 1 points by engineer4 (272) 2 years ago

I would agree that there are kooks on all sides. And also about choice and genetics. But that does not stop the discrimination or pre-judgment of others. Human nature has this inherent problem.

[-] 1 points by francismjenkins (3713) 2 years ago

Well, it's not pre-judgement really is it? I mean, it's based on a very specific, and admitted set of beliefs. If I say I believe that bugs bunny is my guardian angel, and floats on a cloud when he's not looking after me, and I'm a grown up, what will you think of me? You would rightfully think I'm crazy, yet equally absurd stories get a free pass, when they're stamped with the indicia of "religion" ...

In fact, stories that in any other context would be considered bat shit crazy, get a free pass by caveat of the fact that they appear in an ancient book. If a group of people walked up to you today and said their cult leader have a meaningful conversation with a burning bush, you would think they were fucking crazy. This is how we scrutinize everything, with the sole exception of religion. In other words, religion is one giant special pleading.

Ask yourself this question. Why are atheists hated so much? Really, atheists are the most discriminated against group in America. Try running for political office as an avowed atheist, see how far you get. But what does it say about our society when a precondition for political office is expressing a sincere belief in what reduces to the absurd? I mean, religious people walk around and openly say people like me are evil, damned, and various other insults. I guess they don't like it when it's aimed back at them?

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

And after that determination is made, a few jokes couldn't hurt, could they? Those who sincerely think a candidate is a misguided fool shouldn't have to treat him/her as if he/she is actually the second most qualified person in the country. I remember Pat Paulson who received actual votes, from people who may have been sincere, but most people knew was a joke. Believe what you like, but there is a 1st Amendment freedom to laugh.

[-] 1 points by engineer4 (272) 2 years ago

More humor is always a good thing.

[-] 3 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

Will Rogers had more truth in a joke than most politicians have in an entire speech.

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 2 years ago

"I believe in a President who's views on religion are his own private affair. Neither imposed upon him by the nation, nor imposed by the nation on him." - Pres. John F. Kennedy

Religion should not be part of politics. The Religious Right is the most dangerous voting block in politics.

They base their votes on religion rather than facts. Because the Religious Right are indoctrinated to ignore factual evidence. It would destroy their faith. So they vote religiously for Republicans because it is a calling from God in hopes of overturning abortion rights, despite the Republican lies about the economy.

This is how Republicans continue getting elected and get away with their lies about the economy in order to serve the interests of the wealthy.

The Religious Right would like to blur the lines of separation of church and state. Religion does not further the political debate. It only distorts and perverts it.

Anyone that perversely uses God for their political advantage should be shunned for it. Instead, Rick Santorum is revered for it. By the Religious Right/Christian Evangelicals.

Christian Evangelicals make up 50% of Republican primary voters. Mitt Romney has to far outspend the other candidates in order to get the edge on the Jesus freaks.

[-] 1 points by engineer4 (272) 2 years ago

April, I do agree that that section of the party is a problem even for me. But that is what they believe and thats okay. But that will never get a candidate from that segment elected. During a primary, the candidates are battling for votes within their party so you see a lot of this moving to the right. The democrats do the same for their far left segment also in the primaries. During the general election, the battle will be in the center so we will see where two candidates actually position themselves.

[-] 2 points by April (3196) 2 years ago

I hear ya. The left has narrow minded, single issue voters too. But it's a matter of a relatively small margin that determines the outcome. I could argue that the Evangelicals pushed George W. over the top and the minority vote pushed Pres. Obama over the top.

But the Religious Right is ultimately more dangerous because it blurs the lines of separation of church and state. They are becoming more powerful over time. Not less. Intermingling politcs and religion. Pulling the party further towards social issues and imposing their morality, that will erode personal freedoms of choice.

I don't see any comparative danger from the left. Whether it be a more powerful minority vote, labor vote, environmentalist vote. I don't see anything from those voting blocks that endangers our Constitution. They way the Religious Right endangers the separation of church and state.

[-] 1 points by engineer4 (272) 2 years ago

Some would argue that the socialist segment is just as dangerous, but I think we agree the extremes of each are problems for the majority.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Good morning April, your comment is better than this post deserves (I am the author) this was just for fun, you really clearly state the problem, I hope you read some of my other stuff :).

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 2 years ago

I understand! Your post is right on target. It demonstrates what I believe is mostly racism and/or right wing zealotry from the birther conspiracy theorists against Pres. Obama. But Mitt Romney is not held to this same standard of scrutiny.

I'm actually surprised the Religious Right/Christian Evangelicals haven't thought of this already - asking for Romney's birth certificate. You beat them to it perhaps!

Your comment about Pres. Kennedy - reminded me of the quote I posted. : )

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

There are a number of factors that go into their process. Part of it is to generate enough noise so that no one notices what is happening or if they do, truthful things that matter are lost in the jumble of crap that doesn't. They play the media like a violin giving them the headlines and teasers that they crave, but never letting them sink their teeth into any real meat.

[-] -1 points by jph (2652) 2 years ago

Faith is a mental illness. Self-delusion is not a trait to vote for.

[-] 1 points by engineer4 (272) 2 years ago

Do you believe in only what you see or experience? I ask if you vote? If so, how would you choose if all candidates possess some faith in something. Is the entire world self delusional and mentally ill? I think not. People believe or have faith In all kinds of things, and many may not be agreeable to you but how can you be judge and jury? I could also call you self delusional but where does that get us? You can do better than that.

[-] 2 points by brightonsage (4494) 2 years ago

We all have to factor the probabilities of candidates making irrational decisions, mental illness, prejudices, religious beliefs, political and economic idealogy, ethnic and cultural heritage are all factors and we all decide how to weight them in our decisions which are influenced by the same factors.

In fact, the world has been demonstrated many times to have been self delusional. We try to convince our selves (as they have in the past) that we are beyond all of that and that we are mostly sane now. If it makes you feel better, go right ahead, but I suggest history may make a different judgement, yet again.

[-] 1 points by jph (2652) 2 years ago

Faith is by definition self-delusion, 'belief in the absence of proof'. This could not be more clear. People cling to happy thoughts, rainbows or whatever to get them through the day, I get that. However this does not give them an excuse to implement public policy based on these delusions. Personally, I no longer suffer the fools talking about it publicly, as if it has some basis in reality outside there chosen faith-cult.

You could call me anything, however the truth is what matters.

Faith has been used since people realized that they could control groups of people using myth, I prefer spreading truth, not lies and myth.

[-] 0 points by NightShade (163) 2 years ago

Fucking Mormon trash

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

ahhhh how can I add to that....

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by bozocountdown321 (-26) 2 years ago

Are ye leftists getting nervous about the sheffif's findings that bozobama's BC is fake-like he is http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-14/obama-returns-to-nyc-for-first-wall-street-fundraiser-of-year.html

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Better hold on to that bag-o-gold, we're creeping through the night........

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by nytefury (-57) 2 years ago

I agree,as soon as Obama is found out to be the Kenyan that we all know he is. We'll turn our attention to Mitt.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

You mean your still waiting?

[-] -1 points by B76RT (-357) 2 years ago

little barry's father was born in kenya.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

really? I never heard anything about that...

[-] -1 points by HoarFriday (27) 2 years ago

Neither Mitt or Barry have any business being in the Whitehouse.

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

one things for sure somebody is going to be there...

[-] -1 points by B76RT (-357) 2 years ago

tell that to barry, he's been there for over 3 years.

[-] -3 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

are you afraid of Mitt? I can see that GirlFridayThe13th is anti -Mormon. Oh but wait this just in.. i'm hearing that its ok for the left loons to hate Christians, Jews and Mormons. But but please love the Muslims. Muslims after all are victims of the imperialist west and just love peace, women, and gays. And they are very tolerant of other religions just like the old hag below.

[-] 4 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Where do you get hate from asking questions? Are you saying all those people who ask about Obama's birth certificate really just hate him?

OMG!!!!!

[-] -2 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

look at girlfridaythe13th's url above its disgustingly anti Mormon. When Mitt is president you'd better keep your cool.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

All I’m doing is asking questions, like do think Mitt might be a Russian mole? I mean it would be the perfect way to get one in, parents born outside the country, just some papers saying that they are American, we know how easy it is to fake those, you slip them in, have a kid then if you can’t get the first one to the White House, you got a backup ready to go.

[-] -2 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

no i don't.

[+] -4 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

I hear that Mitten might be a secret illegal Mexican immigrant.

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

I was thinking Russian mole, I mean it would be the perfect way to get one in, parents born outside the country, just some papers saying that they are American, we know how easy it is to fake those, you slip them in, have a kid then if you can’t get the first one to the White House, you got a backup ready to go.

[+] -4 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Well...........

I guess it is possible.

I mean his dad & he do look . . . facially more Russian rather than South American.

His dad could possibly have been a sleeper. Cold war stories about that kind of thing going on.

???????????????????????????????????????????

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

And is anybody that successful in business without some "inside" help?

Who really runs Bain, the KGB?

[+] -5 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Hey?

Do you think it could be true?

You know . . . that Ron P. is Hitlers Argentinian luv child?

I mean picture that disgusting little mustache on his face and the possible family resemblance really pops-out.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

you know I think I do see it....maybe even more so on the son...

[+] -5 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Coincedence? Or just an irony of similar positions?

Hey? ever here about how a pet owner can look like their pet?

I wonder............

You know . . . Sanatorium kind of has that look too. HMmmmmmm.......

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

and Martin told not judge people by the color of their skin, but hey we're not talking color this is family resemblance maybe it is one big family...The Family,

this is worst than Russians...

[+] -5 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

What!?

Are you thinking the Bavarian Illuminati?

How sinister. They have been behind everything since the beginning of time!

Hell!!!!!!!!!! I think they "ARE" behind time! How slickly evil!

Sure...sure. I see it now.

Who else would have the power to give the Pillsbury Dough-Boy Life? ( Neuter ).

How insidious!

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

errr....I was thinking Dr. Who, remember, The Family?

but you are scareing me,... stop it!

(I did read that)

[+] -5 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Sorry. I was not up on the family reference. Dr. Who? Funny stuff I saw some of the early series on PBS.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

My kid and I have watched it for decades, started on PBS, it's on BBC America now and they had a multi-parter about "The Family" But I remember reading "The Illuminati" long ago, kind of like De Vince Code I guess but I only saw that movie.

[+] -5 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Oh the Illuminati can be a fun and fascinating read. There are some pretty wild books out there on them.

It is true though that they are taught about in Bavarian schools.

You can even google them and receive a bunch of links to Illuminati scam organizations.

[-] -2 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

you guys are joking, right? no one in their right mind believed that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii and no one has even mentioned what you all are talking about.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (21783) 2 years ago

I am an ex Mormon. Sure you wanna go around?

[-] -3 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

oh but now you hate them. but wait, i thought that the loony left was opened minded but you are being outright mean to a peaceful religion. You like those muslims though don't you?

[-] 3 points by GirlFriday (21783) 2 years ago

But, wait.........isn't it time for you to go log out and log back in as someone else?

Shut up.

[-] -2 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

you are a hateful vulgar person. that web site was sick, get some help b

[Removed]

[+] -4 points by HoarFriday (27) 2 years ago

That explains a lot! ANYONE able to be lead down that path, for even five seconds, is defective, PERIOD, end of discussion.

[-] 4 points by GirlFriday (21783) 2 years ago

Hahahahahahaha. Yeah........Says the guy with multiple IDs.

[-] -3 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

it is funny how the left has so many hateful people. .