Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: mind control state

Posted 2 years ago on July 20, 2012, 2:44 a.m. EST by nini (4)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

This will sound like it is a tinfoil rant but it is true. A technology has been developed the us government which allows a computer program to run in the nural wiring of brain. And allows the control of a person nervous system IT is being used in amass mind control program currently that is being perpetuate on the public at large.
This distribution of technology into a person effects their very being and its use against a person will should be regarded as a gross human rights violation. The interference of a person being against there will is tantamount to rape. This is a call for the united nations to: 1)recognise this technology exists 2) ban the use of technology
3) for its use to be regarded as a human rights violation (the control of a person nervous system without their consent) 4) for the people who distribute this technology to be brought to justice. 5) Recognition of privacy of mind 6) the right to self determination of mind 7) the right to complete control of mind 8) the out right ban of mind control state. To those that “know” Can you remove it? Will it go if ask?. Try! It wont!
Iit is the beginning of the mind control state. ‘

To those that “know” and have it in them To have sex with someone without there consent is rape. To touch someone with out there permission is assault. It is the same to control someone nervous system with out there consent. You believe you just “are” but you need to have a good look at yourselves and what you are doing. Without consent you are perpetuating a crime against humanity. Regardless of your beliefs this technogy it is being distributed to change our society and as such needs to be discussed in a public forum. That is how secular democracy works. Those that know speak free about it not covertly. Raise awareness of it. To those who are distributing this technology.
Speak out send your experience and knowledge of this technology http://www.mindjustice.org/

you must realize that the dissemination of your belief structure on to a person’s being against their will is wrong. Think of another group in society forcing their belief structure into your very being. Controlling your dreams. You believe you are good so many groups in the world but would you like led by them. If another country did it, it would be considered an act of war

United Nations Declaration Of human rights. . The forceful control of a persons nervous system is in violation of artical 3 Article 3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

To force your belief structure on to another person is violation of article 2 (are you being led?) Article 2. • Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

The interference with someone’s mind and body is in violation of article 12 Article 12. • No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

The force of a belief structure an interference with a person mind on to another person is in violation of article 18 and 19 ( are you being led?)

Article 18. • Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

A person has the right to self determination in their own minds with out interference A has the right to full control of thier nervous system without interference

The distribution of this technology is being run in covertly. For goals above be met
1) It proven that this technology exists. The mechanism for the distribution of this technology must be found. I ask those who have this technology in them to speak out. 2) Public awareness must be raised of technology.




Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by ZenDog (13312) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago
  • nini

rhymes with zinnie

short for

  • nincompoop

signed up today

you fraud

[-] 1 points by nini (4) 2 years ago

not a fraud bro. This is really occurring in society at large. Its a difficult thing prove.I ask you If were happening to you, how would you go about raising awareness of it ? How could u prove it exists?

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (13312) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago
[-] 0 points by SteveKJR (-497) 2 years ago

Sort of like a "sublimital message"?

[-] 2 points by ZenDog (13312) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

you fucker

  • you need to be able to spell and to follow grammatical procedure if you are to articulate your position with credibility.

  • you have to recognize that some of this technology does in fact have a legitimate application - I refer to the use of FMRI technology that is aiding quadriplegics to over come their disability as an example of appropriate use.

  • we have the capacity to kill using some of this technology - I have but a partial list of the dead. It includes individuals like Robert Woodward and may be said to include people like Julie Henderson . . .


  • Jules

She was kinda cute, and kinda young,

and no one knew she kept a pistol

in her purse. She only used it once.


So now I wonder: Was she the Master

of her own Domain?

Upon this point we could now dispute . . .


I would see her often at the slams

come Friday nite, and often she would win,

way back in nineteen ninety-nine.


She would feign with innocence,

thinly veil a smile and flirt

with mystery . . .


When she got the news, she did not fight,

she simply took control. "Cancer" she was told,

was why she could not eat.


So now I wonder: Was she the Master

of her own Domain?

Upon this point we could now dispute . . .


Would she have sought to overcome

had she not learned the Great Distrust

within Domain?


No one knew she kept a pistol

in her purse. Yet they said so

passing by.


She only used it once.


© D. Winter

June 19, 2008



http://zendogblog.net .

[-] 1 points by Renneye (3314) 2 years ago

Good to see ya ZenDog! Why not put Robert Woodward as a topic in and off itself on the main forum. Many times I think some of the best information gets buried in the body of others' threads. The Robert Woodward info warrants having a thread of it's own.

[-] 3 points by ZenDog (13312) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

That is an interesting idea.

The fact is that "Woody" is only one victim among what seems to me to be a very great many. I'm not sure when it began, but I note that from 1997 until at least 2010, when Joseph Stack flew a small plane into a building named Echelon I in Austin, Texas, there have been a great number of people who have, one way or the other, committed murder and or suicide while insisting that some unidentified they are out to get them.

I do not mean to suggest here that it was "Woody's" intent to harm anyone - including himself, when he went to the Unitarian Church in Brattleboro on December 2, 2001. I do not believe that to be the case any more than I believe that the officers involved were knowingly involved in a conspiracy with the intent to kill him.

What I do believe is that something terrified "Woody", made him fear for his own life, and the lives of those around him, so badly that he fled for sanctuary to a Church, whose members found him in such a state of agitation that they were unable to make sense of his statements. I also believe that the officers involved acted in good faith, based on their training and limited experience with such situations . . .

I find it highly likely that a similar process of terrorism - for make no mistake, that is what it is - is the most likely explanation behind the recent Jet Blue Pilot Incident involvling Clayton Osbon who it will be remembered, ran through the cabin of a Jet Blue plane in flight, ranting about al Qaeda, at a time when he should have been at the controls of the plane.

[-] 1 points by nini (4) 2 years ago

ZenDog :"fucker" hey, So you "know".? The use of this technology against someones will a human rights violation, I don't think that u can make an argument against that. This technology is being used to force a particular particular state of mind and belief structure on society, which i believe is wrong. Fundamentalist Muslims are doing the same abet with different methodology. I believe in the secular state. But if you are fighting the good fight then come out of hiding and tell the world who you are. I believe eventually that the use technology will be see as a crime against humanity and its use regulated. Consent is must.

[-] 4 points by ZenDog (13312) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

I don't think that u can make an argument against that.

I don't. What I argue against is your apparent unwillingness or inability to articulate your points with clarity and precision. It's nothing personal, the simple fact is that most often, when this topic comes up, it is smothered by what can only be termed paranoid rantings and outlandish accusations that must sound as if they came right out of some science fiction novel - in the absence of hard evidence and credible research that is, and to the uninitiated.

then come out of hiding and tell the world who you are.

I'm not hiding. Long ago I came to the startling conclusion that in reality, there is no where to hide . . .

[-] 1 points by Renneye (3314) 2 years ago

Thanks nini. Keep at it. When this forum started, I couldn't mention the words 'globalist, ruling elite, NWO' just to name a few, without being virtually attacked and ridiculed. Now these terms are being talked about openly here. If you have the time to be persistant, please persevere.

Do you have any info in the way of links, youtube, etc. to lend some educational material to our forum friends?

[-] 1 points by shooz (17792) 2 years ago

Who needs HAARP when we have Madison Avenue.

[-] 1 points by nini (4) 2 years ago

I supose for argument sake take it as a hypothetical. If such a technology did exist and was being used would it right.

[-] 2 points by ZenDog (13312) from South Burlington, VT 2 years ago

There is nothing hypothetical about it at all. MKULTRA has been well documented, despite the fact that the topic as a whole remains stained with an aura of incredulity.

I find it very disappointing that this entire post tends to feed that . . . smoke . . . that does surround this topic.

[-] 1 points by rayolite (461) 2 years ago

Agreed! The natural forms of hypnosis that are documented by psychology have all the control needed to get us where we are. Psychotronics tend to be undocumented and detract from what is already breaching security and the constitution.

[-] 1 points by nini (4) 2 years ago

yeah I know. I wouldn't believe it either if it hadn't happened to me. To get people to realize that this is happened is going to extremely hard. but it is happening. I can only hope that others know about it speak out.

[-] 1 points by thetao (15) 2 years ago

you're right it does sound like a tin foil hat rant.



[-] -1 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 2 years ago

Ya, it's called a TELEVISION

[-] 2 points by shooz (17792) 2 years ago

It's actually called multi-pronged marketing/PR.

Try not think so narrowly.

[-] 0 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 2 years ago

There is nothing more powerful than the TV.

Sound and visuals pumped into people's minds, as they gaze into the unit.

[-] 2 points by shooz (17792) 2 years ago

Plenty of other stuff out there, just as powerful.

You have no idea what the term means.

TV has never operated in a vacuum.

[-] -1 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 2 years ago

You think "I" have no idea what it is? I could talk circles around you in regards to that shit if I felt like it, and I can tell you that you dont know what you are talking about, because you arent even using term in any meaningful context.

Tell ya what, please give me an example, in your view, of "multipronged marketing/PR"....Maybe I'm wrong.

[-] 3 points by shooz (17792) 2 years ago

You always talk in circles anyways.

Do a study on Rove, and you will learn, or you could try reading "Deadly Spin".

It's the actual corporate term for what they do.

You spew it every time you say both parties are the same.