Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: ME ME ME that is all that I hear from any of you....

Posted 12 years ago on Feb. 2, 2012, 9:29 p.m. EST by ProudAmerican1970 (-11)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

You say that life is unfair. You say that other people have more than you. You say that no one likes you. Too damn bad! No one owes you idiots anything and if that is how your parents raised you, shame on them!

63 Comments

63 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 5 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

You, you you, are a jerk.

Life is fine, it's WallStreet and the banks that are unfair.

Dumb fucks better keep making good on my earned pension.

You don't know any of these things, so shame on you!!

[-] 1 points by shadz66 (19985) 12 years ago

& "ME ME ME, that is all that I hear from" Sociopathic & Misanthropic 'Randian' Parasites !!!

"quid pro quo", bro' !!

[-] 2 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

Ain't that the truth!!!!!!

You left off narcissistic.

[-] 1 points by shadz66 (19985) 12 years ago

That's true too !!! + This doc. comes to mind : http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/i-psychopath/ !! Fiat Lux !

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

It's OK to tromp on your brother, just get him under contract............:)

[-] 3 points by toukarin (488) 12 years ago

Yeah... no one owes me anything... I can live with that...

But stop fucking with my civil liberties... stop using my tax dollars to fight wars which only serve the interests of the military industrial complex...stop using my tax dollars to bail out too big to fail dinosaurs...

Technically... that should not have happened in such a proudly capitalist America... Which side of the bailout debate were you on Mr. No one owes you idiots anything?

Bring back Glass Steagall, break up the bankers cabals and bring back real competition, remove corporate financing from politics and bring back real democracy.

Freedom of speech? Everyone gets one vote... I think its only fair everyone gets the option to spend only the same chunk of change on a politicians campaign (if at all).

Your parents raised you to be a self-righteous prick? Shame on them too.

[-] 2 points by Progression (143) 12 years ago

You you you, that is all that I hear from you. How long do you expect the majority to be silent on bailouts? on wall street fraud? on just being plain screwed?

[-] 2 points by OurTimes2011 (377) from Arlington, VA 12 years ago

Wow. A little angry, are we. I have heard no one say the things you claim. If you have, well, so what? You are a moron and a troll. Go back to sleep.

We will wake you in the spring.

[-] 2 points by elf3 (4203) 12 years ago

Freedom isn't upheld with silence and acceptance -I believe I'm owed FREEDOM - but only if I can keep it - so I'll continue to whine and bitch and moan until the end of my days - freedom is loud and whiny. If you challenge MY democracy - I will challenge you and if you don't like my whining you can go to to Saudi Arabia where they keep that stuff in check.

[-] 2 points by elf3 (4203) 12 years ago

wrong !!! - I'm owed FREEDOM but only if I can keep it - that's why I'll continue to whine and bitch and moan until the end of my days - freedom isn't upheld with silence and acceptance. If you challenge MY democracy - I will challenge you and if you don't like my whining - you can go to to Saudi Arabia where they keep that stuff in check.

[-] 2 points by TrevorMnemonic (5827) 12 years ago

Wall Street fraud needs to stop.

Corruption in government needs to stop.

We should have universal healthcare and education should be more important than war mongering. I'm in perfect health and I have already graduated college.

[+] -5 points by ProudAmerican1970 (-11) 12 years ago

Canada is a good place for people like you that think that the government should take care of them. Go give it a try!

[-] 1 points by TrevorMnemonic (5827) 12 years ago

Canada also isn't 15 trillion in debt and at war with a bunch of countries. Sounds like they know what they're doing in those regards.

Do you want to show each other our penises and see who's is bigger?

[-] 2 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

fuck you nimrod


the banking industry's entire approach to the matter of risk is absolutely insane

People perfectly capable of paying their loan at the initial rate, yet not at rate that

balloons higher in 3-5 years, get shafted . . .

How you ask? I know you are on the verge of spinning the bullshit to maintain control

of perceptions as soon as I post -

the banks didn't complete the paperwork demonstrating ability - or inability - to pay.

Then they paid the mortgage writer, for writing the loan. They gave bonuses for every

one. This in part encouraged the lender who dealt with the customer to lie - and lie

they did - assuring the skeptical that this type of loan would be just fine for them - of

course the borrower in such cases had no idea the lender would bundle their *bad

loan* with hundreds of others and sell them on the open market - and to help

overcome any hesitancy on the part of the borrower, they offered to loan up to 98 %

of the property value.

The fukers shot themselves in the foot - and everyone else too.

And much of this behavior stems from their perceptions of risk.

  • riskier customers deserve a higher interest rate

and yet their criteria for risk evaluation only tells part of the story - as is clearly seen

with the results of their own behavior. Of course it was risky to lend far and wide

knowing the loans were bad - Of course it was risky to sell so many bad loans on the

open market . . .

  • of course the fuckers are insane

  • and I'd like to lynch the lot of the mutherfuckers.


it was a fuking paper scam perpetrated upon the people borrowing the money, and on

the market that bought the bundles of bad debt.

these could be your neighbors, your neighborhood.

and all a you little righties blame the borrower, out of an abundance of racism and

classism, stirred up by the fools who brought this economic meltdown on us all.

fukin nitwits

Entire communities devastated with nothing more than a smile and the stroke of a pen

and I'd like to lynch the lot of the bastards responsible in the public square.

  • WITHOUT JUSTICE

  • THERE WILL BE NO PEACE

[-] 2 points by BradB (2693) from Washington, DC 12 years ago
[-] 2 points by gnomunny (6819) from St Louis, MO 12 years ago

I actually think this is a good idea. When it first came up a couple months ago I asked our more financially informed posters how much does a bank charter cost these days but got no reply. Have any idea? I seem to remember back in the eighties it was $100,000 (I think).

[-] 0 points by commonsense11 (195) 12 years ago

I can't get past your ignorant, angry attempt to belittle the poster to even read if anything you have to say is worthwhile. If the movement is dependent upon the likes of your potty mouth and abrasive attitude then it's a lost cause. Perhaps your parents forgot to teach you manners.

[-] 3 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

don't read it nimrod

see if I care

[-] 1 points by commonsense11 (195) 12 years ago

You perfectly represent the movement in fact should be it's "Poster Child" my friend.

[-] 0 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

i bet you and ProudAmerican1970 share the same isp

and you both perfectly represent what is wrong with the country - it begins with widespread denial

[-] 0 points by commonsense11 (195) 12 years ago

Based upon that statement I'd say you are one of those conspiracy theorist that believes we are responsible for 911 and are hiding little green men out in Area 51. Hate to disappoint you but you got it wrong.

[-] 1 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

there are no aliens

that's just another lie

told by actors on a stage

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

Except for the multi-personality asshole who is being allowed to fuck around with this forum.

[-] -2 points by headlesscross (67) 12 years ago

nimrod -- either a hunter, or a person regarded as silly or foolish. The dictionary goes on to explain that the second meaning probably originated with the cartoon character Bugs Bunny. The wily Bugs used the term in its original sense to refer to dithering hunter Elmer Fudd, whom he called a "poor little Nimrod." Over time, however, the "hunter" meaning got dropped, and the "dithering" connotation stuck.

Nimrod was in fact a Biblical figure -- the great-grandson of Noah. He was a haughty king who declared himself a "mighty one in the earth," founded the great city of Babylon, and presided over the construction of the mythical Tower of Babel. Nimrod was also a renowned hunter, though at least one source we found claimed his game of choice was not animals but men, whom he would enslave upon capture. Whatever his prey, his name became synonymous with a skilled hunter.

Not really a great insult ZD,perhaps you should just resort to your usual hostile venom.

[-] 3 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

nimrod - a babbelonian ditherer who stutters with a lisp

I think it's perfect

nimrod

[-] 2 points by CurveOfBindingEnergy (165) 12 years ago

The "poster" is probably you or one of your three ass-buddies who are continually making up new accounts and posting here as if you were new.

ProudAmerican1970 Joined Feb. 2, 2012

Funny thing is you three puckered sphincters think you have numbers just because you each have dozens of accounts ... LOL

You're one of the 13% that thinks you're the 1%.

[-] -1 points by commonsense11 (195) 12 years ago

You're propensity to make an assumption that I am registered under multiple accounts (I'm not) is an indication of how paranoid you are. You speak as gospel something that is only a theory shared by you and your paranoid like minded posters. It makes an sane person think twice about taking anything you have to say that you can't offer video proof for serious.

[-] 1 points by CurveOfBindingEnergy (165) 12 years ago

Do you know the difference between an assertion, an assumption and a supposition?

Are you stupid?

The last was a rhetorical question ...

[-] -1 points by commonsense11 (195) 12 years ago

I was correct. He was making an assumption base upon his paranoid personality. The real question, just how stupid are you? I don't even have to know you to assert there is a 99% chance you can't even begin to fathom what I do for a living or in the next decade with training be able to. That is both assumption and assertion.

[-] 2 points by CurveOfBindingEnergy (165) 12 years ago

LOL. An assumption and assertion that makes you wrong twice.

You've got your head so far up your own ass you have to reach down your throat to pick your nose.

[-] 0 points by commonsense11 (195) 12 years ago

"Probably" implies an assumption. Followed by his assertion based upon that assumption which is a product of his paranoid delusion. You sir are an idiot!

[-] -3 points by ProudAmerican1970 (-11) 12 years ago

LOL I have one account and only signed on yesterday to bring an opposing viewpoint to this drastically factless forum. You people are so brainwashed that it is really very scary.

[-] 3 points by unimportant (716) 12 years ago

The facts don't support your claim this forum is fact-less unless you are speaking to those, such as yourself, that ignore the facts, thus imposing ignorance upon yourselves. This is also known as self-impose ignorance, i.e. stupidity.

[+] -4 points by ProudAmerican1970 (-11) 12 years ago

babble, babble, mindless dribble, babble....

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago
[-] -1 points by unimportant (716) 12 years ago

Yes, now wipe your chin and spit out the paint chips or grow a pair and discuss the actual differences. The choice is, as always, yours to babble and drool like an idiot or act like the man you mom hopes you to become :-)

[-] 2 points by UncomonSense (386) 12 years ago

Which is much more factual now that you are spouting Beck/Limbaugh bullshit here ... thanks for the laugh!

[-] 1 points by BradB (2693) from Washington, DC 12 years ago

actually.. I believe they are reading ZD's posts and actually getting something from them

[-] -2 points by commonsense11 (195) 12 years ago

Totally disagree. Only angry trust fund kids and lazy people that refuse to take responsibility for themselves are impressed with that type of abrasiveness.

[-] 3 points by BradB (2693) from Washington, DC 12 years ago

well... at least it's verbal abrasiveness... and it is always in reply to the originating insults... frankly I'm getting tired of trying to teach these selfish assholes who come here criticizing us and what we are trying to do.... they deserve every bit of it... and they probably want it.. or they wouldn't keep coming back...

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

And just WTF is with paying off interest prior to paying off principal. The Principal keeps generating interest.

Pay off the principal 1st don't apply that payment to the interest Mr. Banker Sir. You will still get your interest after the principal is paid. Interest does not earn interest. So lets get the principal paid 1st.

[-] 2 points by gestopomillyy (1695) 12 years ago

Compound interest arises when interest is added to the principal, so that from that moment on, the interest that has been added also earns interest. This addition of interest to the principal is called compounding.

this is how mortgages work.. unbelievable but true..

[-] 0 points by slammersworldisback (-217) 12 years ago

that is the most foolish thing I have ever read.....why would anyone lend money under such a stupid system like that........you are renting money, and the rent comes out first.......that is how it works....but, if you'd like to loan me several thousand under your system....I'm game

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

Still digging holes?

[-] 0 points by slammersworldisback (-217) 12 years ago

that's your response? sad....

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

No you should expect it from everyone who has dealt with you before. If you don't. That is sad.

[-] -1 points by slammersworldisback (-217) 12 years ago

"dealt with me"....hahaha

cute

most of you can't back up your arguments with anything by emotion and opinion....don't blame me for that, try getting a clue

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

He doesn't know, there's no dealing with the insane.

[-] 0 points by slammersworldisback (-217) 12 years ago

yeah, yeah....you little fools in your protected little enclaves where you can censor and conceal any idea's that you don't agree with.....THAT is insanity..

You've worked all your lives and have nothing, or little of nothing to show for it, and you keep beating your heads against the wall thinking if you just get everyone else in the world to change, your lives will be OK....

that is insanity my friend....if you want the world to change for you, YOU have to change......

[-] 2 points by shoozTroll (17632) 12 years ago

NO---------------------coming back here and repeating yourself over and over.

And over.

Yet always getting the same result------------------------Is insane.

Totally insane.

[-] -1 points by ProudAmerican1970 (-11) 12 years ago

Good Lord. You people are so uneducated. Poor poor souls.

[-] 1 points by hamalmang (722) from Lebanon, PA 12 years ago

A lord is a man who keeps the bread. Good breadman.

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 12 years ago

I think we want a fair shake. Our parents didn't tell us to bribe politicians to fix the rules so only we could win. But the 1% did. There are many examples, if you would do a little investigation. We are owed a system that is fair, no loopholes. When the economy was good the income of the 1% went up 275 %, the income of the bottom 20% went down. The next two quintiles when up but only slightly. When the economy got bad, the 1% still did fine (company profits are at an all time high) while unemployment went to an effective 20%. Are you really in the 1% or just a tool for them?

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 12 years ago

well certainly not you! ha

[-] 1 points by ithink (761) from York, PA 12 years ago

That is all you hear, because that is all you know. If you open your eyes you will see more than just 'things' and if you open your ears, you will hear more than just 'me'.

[-] 1 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 12 years ago

Read Matt Taibbi and get a clue !

[+] -4 points by ProudAmerican1970 (-11) 12 years ago

Is that the standard-issue response? LOL No thanks, I think that I will keep my mind drug and dribble free.

[-] 1 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 12 years ago

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

"Matt Taibbi is the best–certainly the most entertaining–financial/political reporter in the country. There is no better book than Griftopia (2010) to which to turn to understand how stupidity, greed, and criminality, spread evenly among policymakers and Wall Street, created the financial crisis that has left Americans overburdened with both private and public debt. Taibbi walks the reader through the fraudulent financial instruments that littered the American, British, and European financial communities with toxic waste. He has figured it all out, and what in other hands might be an arcane account for MBAs is in Taibbi’s hands a highly readable and entertaining story." - Paul Craig Roberts

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

What is wrong with stating 'me." I am more perceptible to people telling their own story than when people talk in generalities. So me in a political discussion makes perfect sense. Why would I care as compassionately when someone talks about general grievances and they themselves have no problems with the Quo themselves. And since you brought it up, I raised myself because My mother was too busy working her ass off to instill values that you feel should have been instilled in me. Besides, at least when i talk about my self, I'm not putting other peoples' parenting skills down, for shame on you.

[-] 0 points by DavidGilbert (64) from Tampa, FL 12 years ago

Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you!

[-] 1 points by elf3 (4203) 12 years ago

very sophisticated Davers

[-] -1 points by FreeDiscussion2 (9) 12 years ago

ProudAmerican1970, YOU are soooooo correct. I dont owe anyone anything. Those that yell shame are those that probably, I say probably, paid ZERO in income taxes. If they didnt pay income taxes then shame on their lazy ass. If they did pay income taxes then they need to pay more if that is their mission in life.

[-] -3 points by TimMcGraw (50) 12 years ago

couldn't agree more. people feel that they're entitled to things that they aren't entitled to.