Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Mark Zuckerberg Is Grandson Of David Rockefeller: Real name, Jacob Greenberg.

Posted 4 years ago on July 7, 2012, 1:33 a.m. EST by newdawning (20)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Mark Zuckerberg Is Grandson Of David Rockefeller: Real name, Jacob Greenberg.

Know the 'ruling elite' and oligarchs we are dealing with. Also Bill Gates not the humble computer geek we were led to believe either. Under wraps for years is the fact that he comes from a multi-billionaire family involved in eugenics, who works with the other oligarchs.

http://nesaraaustralia.wordpress.com/2012/07/06/mark-zuckerberg-is-grandson-of-david-rockefeller-real-name-jacob-greenberg/

12 Comments

12 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by gnomunny (6819) from St Louis, MO 4 years ago

This explains a lot! About FaceBook, I mean. I've been wondering why my gut has told me to avoid FB at all costs. My animosity of Gates is also well-known. I honestly hate these fucking people.

[-] 3 points by jrhirsch (4714) from Sun City, CA 4 years ago

And when you hate people, it becomes easy to believe lies about them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zuckerberg#Personal_life

[-] 3 points by gnomunny (6819) from St Louis, MO 4 years ago

True. I do have a problem with Gates and Zuckerberg, making it easy for me to believe bad press. That Wikipedia article notwithstanding, though, my problem with them have nothing to do with their lineage, so my feelings will continue unabated. For the record, I don't hate much, but I have to admit, I hate bullies, backstabbers, and thieves, which are the actual reasons I can't stand either one of them guys.

[-] 1 points by jrhirsch (4714) from Sun City, CA 4 years ago

I see Gates as a modern robber baron, a predator, and worthy of contempt. But when I smell the foul odor of pure manufactured conspiracy theory that is so rampant on the internet, even Gates' ruthlessness smells like a rose in comparison.

[-] 2 points by gnomunny (6819) from St Louis, MO 4 years ago

Yeah, I do have to admit that I get caught up in it occasionally myself. But I have to ask again, how does your Wiki link refute the OP? Although the OP's link has no real substance (I should know better by now), your link doesn't really say anything about his lineage.

[-] 1 points by jrhirsch (4714) from Sun City, CA 4 years ago

From the wiki page: Zuckerberg was born in 1984 in White Plains, New York.[12] He is the son of Karen (née Kempner), a psychiatrist, and Edward Zuckerberg, a dentist.[13] He and his three sisters, Randi, Donna, and Arielle,[2] were brought up in Dobbs Ferry, New York.[2] Zuckerberg was raised Jewish, had his bar mitzvah when he turned 13.

One of the most important things I have learned on this forum is to always check the sources. Especially the posts you tend to agree with.

[-] 2 points by gnomunny (6819) from St Louis, MO 4 years ago

Ah, but it says nothing about grandparents. It's entirely possible that either mom or dad is related to a Rockefeller, so you don't actually refute the OP. Just sayin'. You are entirely correct about checking the sources, though. I'm used to getting my info from reference books, not the net, so I'm not quite used to sifting through so much crap to find the "truth." I'd like to think I'm getting better, though.

[-] 1 points by jrhirsch (4714) from Sun City, CA 4 years ago

I hope you don't want me to waste time refuting the plethora of conspiracy theories posted on this forum?

Isn't that their purpose? Fill the forum with weeds so the flowers can't bloom?

[-] 2 points by gnomunny (6819) from St Louis, MO 4 years ago

Absolutely not. I'm just saying the Wiki link doesn't refute the OP's contention. I should've started my original comment with, "If true, this explains a lot." Now, get on to more important things, jr, your knowledge and talents are wasted on C-T's. That's not sarcasm, by the way, it's sincere.

[-] 2 points by francismjenkins (3713) 4 years ago

Is this what we call proof these days? The scared of the dark, conspiracy around ever corner crowd, makes a real conspiracy much more likely to succeed (sort of like the boy who cried wolf syndrome).

This is what happens in many protest movements. It begins with a sort of natural self-selection process (the result of the sort of people attracted to a movement by caveat of public perceptions regarding the movement), then group think slowly creeps in, the ideology becomes increasingly purist, those who may be lukewarm about some aspects of its thinking, are slowly repelled away, and in this environment, people become increasingly desperate and radicalized.

Soon enough, the movement loses deep thinking people, no more devils advocates to debate and challenge ideas, and monolithic group think eventually dominates, and the group becomes exceedingly marginalized and irrelevant (which will generally push the group towards extremism).

[-] 2 points by jrhirsch (4714) from Sun City, CA 4 years ago

Can you back up the story with any facts?

[-] 2 points by SiriusBlackSun (8) 4 years ago

I always knew Zuckerberg was a phony front man. The guy could barely hold an interview.

[Removed]