Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: "Cease And Desist" Order - Many Of The Ruling Globalist Elite (.01%) Are Named

Posted 3 years ago on Feb. 13, 2012, 4:54 p.m. EST by Renaye (522)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

The next critical step is to expose the globalist .01% by name. Most of them are on this cease and desist order found at the bottom of this link;


The undersigned therefore issue this Cease and Desist Order which is to serve as legal notification to the following Parties whom the undersigned deem to have acted in Bad Faith, who may not use, or allow use of, or claim title, or have right or control of all and or any assets, or derivatives thereof, in the attached list of funds and assets, Marked “Annex A” until they provide proof of just account and stewardship to the undersigned -- and until and unless the undersigned issue, on a case by case, transaction by transaction basis, a certificate of allowance for the use thereof, such allowance to be given in writing under their hands only in response to a request by a Government Ministry of Finance.

This Cease and Desist Order is issued and effective from this 5th Day of January 2012 to all Parties specifically nominated and stated below:

  • BAN Ki-MOON, Secretary-General United Nations
  • BARCLAYS GROUP, London and Worldwide.
  • BAROSSO, José Manuel D., President of the European Commission
  • BERLUSCONI, Sylvio, former Prime Minister of Italy
  • BERNANKE, Ben S., Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
  • BLAIR, Tony A.C.L., former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
  • BUSH Sr., George H.W., 41st President of the United States of America
  • BUSH Jr., George W., 43rd President of the United States of America
  • CAMERON, David W.D., Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
  • CLINTON, Hillary D.R., United States Secretary of State
  • DAVIGNON, Étienne F.J., former vice-president European Commission
  • DIMON, James / JP MORGAN
  • DRAGHI, Mario, President of the European Central Bank (/ex-GOLDMAN SACHS)
  • EMANUEL, Rahm I., Mayor of Chicago
  • GEITHNER, Timothy F., United States Secretary of the Treasury
  • GREENSPAN, Alan, 13th Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
  • KISSINGER, Henry A.
  • MONTI, Mario, Prime Minister of Italy (/ex-GOLDMAN SACHS)
  • NETANYAHU, Benjamin “Bibi”, Prime Minister of Israel
  • PAPADEMOS, Lucas, Prime Minister of Greece (/ex-GOLDMAN SACHS)
  • PAULSON, Henry “Hank” M., former United States Secretary of the Treasury (74th)
  • QUEEN ELIZABETH II. / HOUSE of WINDSOR, The United Kingdom & Commonwealth
  • QUEEN BEATRIX / HUIS van ORANJE, The Netherlands
  • ROCKEFELLER, David Sr.
  • ROCKEFELLER, John “Jay” D. IV
  • ROMNEY, W. Mitt
  • ROMPUY van, Herman A., President of the European Council
  • ROTHSCHILD de, Evelyn R.A.
  • ROTHSCHILD de, David M.
  • RUBIN, Robert E., former United States Secretary of the Treasury (70th)
  • SARKOZY, Nicolas, President French Republic
  • SOROS, George
  • SUMMERS, Lawrence “Larry” H., former Director of the National Economic Council (USA)
  • WOOTTON, David, Lord Mayor CITY OF LONDON
  • WORLD BANK (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development)

  • ALL GOVERNMENT offices in the United States, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, The Netherlands, Belgium, France and Japan;

  • ALL Commercial and Central BANKS at any location in the world, especially those with a registered office or branch in Switzerland, Hong Kong, Singapore, United States, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, The Netherlands, Belgium, France, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan;

  • ALL PERSONS, CORPORATIONS or other LEGAL ENTITIES attempting to use these accounts without the expressed written permission of the undersigned.

Remedy may be obtained by way of providing true account of the accounts set forth in “Annex A” hereto attached -- and/or obtaining the specific approval of the undersigned.

Signed : January 5, 2012

           …………………………                                                          …………………………
       Keith Francis SCOTT                                                                Neil Francis KEENAN    

A: List of funds and assets:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Reference: Family Guarantee Heritance. (His Heir Son from Grantee), Last Holder, Signatory, Ownership, PATN, 101371 / Position III.

For the Gold of Certificate Guarantee, Platinum of Certificate Guarantee, and Obligation of Certificate Guarantee, All the writing in the Black Book registered.

Guarantee Secret Code No. 754008979933/GIS/441. FC – 719098 - Union Bank of Switzerland – GTF – 91 – NVS

Reference Code No. M550–7825-9096- M5307-8259-069.34200313.

Statement Code No. VFT/2006747711/NG/4100001109/CFT/3218867571/CFT.6540078688

Heritance Code, No. 0067/D/4515/LM/45/A/00045/INDONESIA/0437756/DC/000045/A/00001




Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by Kirby (104) 3 years ago

Looks like a who's who of bilderbergs.

[-] 2 points by PeaceNow (84) 3 years ago

Well, you sure are on the ball! I sure wish Zbigniew Brzezinski's name was on there though. He's a particular brand of evil that one.

[-] 0 points by Kirby (104) 3 years ago

You got that right.

[-] 2 points by mvjobless (370) 3 years ago

There is a book called America's Sixty Families, which was written just before the 1929 crash. My father gave it to me years ago, it's a good reference. Anyway you might want to find a copy of that to see who all the ruling families were and still are.

[-] 1 points by SparkyJP (1646) from Westminster, MD 3 years ago

Ferdinand Lundberg, 1937 -

"The United States is owned and dominated today by a hierarchy of its sixty richest families, buttressed by no more than ninety families of lesser wealth... These families are the living center of the modern industrial oligarchy which dominates the United States, functioning discreetly under a de jure democratic form of government behind which a de facto government, absolutist and plutocratic in its lineaments, has gradually taken form since the Civil War. This de facto government is actually the government of the United States -- informal, invisible, shadowy. It is the government of money in a dollar democracy."

America's 60 Families list:


[-] 2 points by mvjobless (370) 3 years ago

What a great passage from the book, it certainly sums up the current situation and what a sad irony that is. This book really is a must see for all the OWS'ers, I hope they'll have a look.

[-] 1 points by SparkyJP (1646) from Westminster, MD 3 years ago

What is really upsetting is the massive amount of power that this de facto government wields.

[-] 2 points by mvjobless (370) 3 years ago

And how deeply entrenched they are considering history, now how to dig them out and throw them out?

[-] 0 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

Exposure, Exposure, Exposure! If OWS would spend some of the OWS money it has amassed on a massive sign campaign with the names of these ruling global elite's (.01%) names on them, the whole world would finally find out who is responsible for the disaster the world has become. The criminal oligarchs need to see their NAMES ON TV!!!!

[-] 1 points by mvjobless (370) 3 years ago

That's a great idea. It beats holding general assemblies discussing, ad nauseum, what everyone should do, and then not much gets done, but this is not to denigrate what they have accomplished thus far.

[-] 1 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

Yes, it is a layered problem of power, but the power elite's are at the tippy top, and until they are exposed, nothing good will happen. Expose them by name and we'll get somewhere.

[-] 1 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

WOW wow wow!!!! Great job! Thanks so much for this compilation of names. May I have your permission to put this into the main posting area if you do not want to do it yourself?

[-] 1 points by SparkyJP (1646) from Westminster, MD 3 years ago

Yes- Of course

Information is the currency of democracy. Thomas Jefferson

[-] 1 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

Thank you, I'll look it up!

[-] 0 points by economicallydiscardedcitizen (761) 3 years ago

Thanks for the mention of that book. I'll watch for it and see if anyone has a site listing those families as they existed at that time.

[-] 1 points by mvjobless (370) 3 years ago

Pretty sure that book has been out of print for decades, maybe your local library can locate it for you.

[-] 2 points by mvjobless (370) 3 years ago

How come Dupont isn't on this list?

[-] 1 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

Yes! Or the Krupps?! On the website in the link it does explain that this list is not all of them. Perhaps those people are the ones helping the authorities. There will be much corroboration needed to put these people away. Now that the $hit is hitting the fan, they're probably stumbling over themselves ratting each other out. Finally, it looks like something may be starting to happen.

[-] 1 points by mvjobless (370) 3 years ago

I hope so, I'm having a hard time imagining just how much worse life could get.


[-] 0 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

That just means you're awake. Hang in there, progress is being made.

[-] 2 points by fairforall (279) 3 years ago

This won't fly with Bill.

[-] 2 points by HitGirl (2263) 3 years ago

Time for a class action lawsuit!

[-] 1 points by Underdog (2971) from Clermont, FL 3 years ago

This is great!. :-O

[-] 1 points by livtru (11) 3 years ago

Where's Rumsfeld's name....and Cheney that evil ba$tard?!

[-] 0 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

I see in the news today they're cornering Berlusconi . One down. Yeh!!!!!



[-] 0 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

So who am I talking to this time....Zen or Thrasy?

Both need to happen, but the stage being changed will only go so far. These actors are so despicable and have such influence, that no matter what props are on the stage, they will act out any play they want. They have no director, they recognize no laws. They answer to no-one. They will pull the curtain down over the house if they want.

The theory dropped off this conspiracy some time ago now. They speak about it openly. So run along now...the matinee down the block is showing Zombie Island.


[-] -1 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

Thrasy, you really could use a vacation. Just a week or two...somewhere peaceful where you don't get so stressed when someone other than yourself uses free speech, maybe de-compartmentalize the personalities down to a dull roar. I hear Florida is lovely this time of year. Or, a nice hillside resort somewhere, like....oh, maybe Vesuvius.


[-] -1 points by PretendHitGirI (13) 3 years ago

We will only have democracy when paupers, not of these select bloodlines and inherited power, are elected to office.

[-] -1 points by 1sealyon (434) 3 years ago

People are not equal. That is just a fact. Some people are short some are tall, some are born with rich parents and some a born in a slum. Some folks are really smart and some can make music come from a violin that will make you cry.

A lot of what I read in this forum is about why we should fight against one group of people or another because they are different or believe something different than we do. But I have never heard anyone say they hate someone because they have a great talent for playing the violin. Why then do we hate someone because they have a great talent for making money?

[-] 2 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

No no no! You couldn't be more wrong. Nothing at all wrong with people being wealthy. What is abhorrently obscene is when they use that wealth to position themselves and "family" members in such a way that they give 'themselves' and act upon what they consider the "divine right" to make godlike decisions with our lives. These people are so obscenely wealthy, they can move entire countries to their knees, cripple entire markets, cause war...and they do. This is the craziness of the elites playing out before our eyes.

[-] 0 points by 1sealyon (434) 3 years ago

Can the President of the US cause a war?

Of course, because people are not equal.

Would you like the same ability to influence the president in starting that war as anyone else; say some really rich person?

If the president has to make a decision about an issue that you are interested in who will have more influence over his action, you or his wife? You cannot begin to match her un-elected-to-any-office influence. And there is a line of hundreds of people behind his wife and in front of you in that queue of influence. People are not equal and wealth is just one of many differences.

After we knock off the rich guys, then who's next in that queue that we must go after? The college professors? Smart doctors? Artists? Who else is in that queue in front of you that we should knock off?

[-] 1 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

Influence is one thing...above the law is another. And by the way, no-one needs to be knocked off, just so I've protected my proverbial hiney here.

The ruling globalist elite (.01%) have systematically created laws whereby they aren't accountable. How is it that that was allowed to happen? Why is there no universal law, organization, elected high governing body that sees to it that by virtue of wealth, one cannot influence in such a way that does harm?

The ruling elite are megalomaniacs. Are we supposed to just 'hope' that they don't decide one day that they want North America as their private environmental utopia? Are we supposed to be at the mercy of their higher ethics that we don't end up on their shit list if they decide that we're breathing too much of "their" air or drinking too much of "their" water?

They have to answer to NO-ONE. How is that right?

[-] -1 points by 1sealyon (434) 3 years ago

Is wealth an immediate disqualifier for someone to influence the Gov?

Suppose someone in Congress needs advice on say a new medicine awaiting FDA approval. What better person to speak to than the chief researcher at a rival drug company. Now that person is likely to give them the other side of the story, but if that expert is also the company founder and quite wealthy are they immediately disqualified? Do you not believe that in many cases there is a correlation between great wealth an great intellect?

Why don't we disqualify people from influencing Gov because they are:

A famous singer or actor. A politicians sister or other relative. A pastor, priest, or rabbi. A famous inventor or author. A learned professor.

People are not equal. That is just a fact.

[-] 1 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

Maybe I'm not explaining succinctly enough, but I don't know how to be more clear that the issue is not wealth.

No, wealth should not be a disqualifier of influence for government if you're talking about information and educated advice, but I think most people would agree at this point, that money from the elite and corporations should be taken out of politics.

It is when the elite use their wealth to do harm, and there is no governing body or set of laws that hold them accountable, so they see themselves as 'above the law', that I have issue with. I believe that there are people of great wealth that have great intellect, Paul Hawken comes to mind. He uses his wealth to do good. The problem is that there are far more people of great wealth that are greedy and callous who's intellect is questionable because they channel their efforts to accumulating their wealth and even more-so "power" at the treachory of others, stripping the masses of their few dollars and the personal freedoms. How is that intelligent?

Yes, it is a fact that people are not equal. I'm not refuting that. I just know that if I were as wealthy as the ruling elite are, there would not be the suffering, and the butchering of this world's precious beautiful people that is going on today. It is inexcusable. For the elite, it has come down to nothing more than control and protecting 'their own' kind, humanity be damned.

When the elite are held to the same standard as we are when it comes to accountability through laws, then I will believe they have the greater good at heart.

[-] 0 points by 1sealyon (434) 3 years ago

Sounds like we are in violent agreement.

[-] 0 points by Renaye (522) 3 years ago

Well, that's one way to put it! Lol! Onward...we have bigger dragons to slay!

[-] -1 points by slizzo (-96) 3 years ago

Everyone on this list does what elected officials allow them to.

You're barking up the wrong tree. None of these people took an oath to the people and the constitution. The ones who did are much more culpable.

[-] 8 points by TheTurtle (12) 3 years ago

The "tree" that Renaye is pointing to is showing that "80 percent of the world's wealth appears to be earned by a "core" of 1,318 corporations, which in turn are being controlled by only 147 companies. 75 percent of these companies are financial institutions -- and the top companies on the list are the Federal Reserve banks. The media has been systematically bought out and controlled by this group -- on a global scale -- meaning that until the rise of the Internet, most people didn't have a clue about what was really going on. The Federal Reserve created 26 to 29 trillion dollars' worth of bailouts for their own companies between 2007 and 2010. This was revealed in their own audit statements -- and confirmed by United States Congressmen and prominent financial analysts...There has been almost no media coverage whatsoever of this staggering theft." Anyway the website is large and it takes time to get through the information.

[-] 2 points by LetsEvolve (9) 3 years ago

You're right, it is large, but your explanation here made me dig in and go through it. It was well worth the time. Thank you. It sheds new light on how the elites do their business and the staggering depth of the corruption we are really dealing with as we remove these people from power. Thanks again!

[-] -1 points by slizzo (-96) 3 years ago

"controlled media" -- laffz

[-] 2 points by PeaceNow (84) 3 years ago

These people have no allegiance or loyalty to anyone. They look out for themselves and their own bloodlines, that's it. These people have a lot of blood on their hands. They let no-one stand in their way. But it looks as though the tides may be changing. I'm wondering why Eric Holder isn't on the list.