Posted 2 years ago on Aug. 11, 2012, 10:21 a.m. EST by agkaiser
from Fredericksburg, TX
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Waging Nonviolence / By Laura Gottesdiener August 8, 2012 “. . . “Perhaps the question, then, is not whether the banks had the right to assert their individual contracts through mortgage repossessions, but whether they had the right to break social contracts through physical eviction. Yes, the individual houses functioned as collateral for the loans, but the survival of the neighborhoods did not. There have been moments throughout U.S. history when the courts have ruled to break contracts, including both mortgage and property-ownership contracts, when the public welfare is threatened.
“Even an afternoon’s tour of South Chicago will reveal that we are in one of those moments in which something will have to break. The city is cutting funding for shelters in order to spend millions tearing down vacant buildings. And at a time like this, a growing number of people are deciding that the most rational thing to do is — in the words of J.R. Fleming of the Chicago Anti-Eviction Campaign — “play matchmaker to pair peopleless homes with homeless people.”
Read about dysfunctional economy and culture: How Does That Work? https://www.createspace.com/3852916