Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Judge strikes down collective bargaining law

Posted 1 year ago on Sept. 14, 2012, 7:34 p.m. EST by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

A Wisconsin judge on Friday struck down nearly all of the state law championed by Gov. Scott Walker that effectively ended collective bargaining rights for most public workers.

Walker's administration immediately vowed to appeal, while unions, which have vigorously fought the law, declared victory. But what the ruling meant for existing public contracts was murky: Unions claimed the ruling meant they could negotiate again, but Walker could seek to keep the law in effect while the legal drama plays out.

The law, Walker's crowning achievement that made him a national conservative star, took away nearly all collective bargaining rights from most workers and has been in effect for more than a year.

Dane County Circuit Judge Juan Colas ruled that the law violates both the state and U.S. Constitution and is null and void. He said the law violated the constitutional rights of free speech and association.

The ruling applies to all local public workers affected by the law, including teachers and city and county government employees, but not those who work for the state. They were not a party to the lawsuit, which was brought by a Madison teachers union and a Milwaukee public workers union.

Walker issued a statement accusing the judge of being a "liberal activist" who "wants to go backwards and take away the lawmaking responsibilities of the legislature and the governor. We are confident that the state will ultimately prevail in the appeals process."

Wisconsin Department of Justice spokeswoman Dana Brueck said DOJ believes the law is constitutional.

Lester Pines, an attorney for Madison Teachers Inc., said the ruling means all local governments, including school districts, are now required to bargain with employees covered by unions, just as they did before the law passed. Pines predicted the case would ultimately be resolved by the state Supreme Court.

"What's going to happen in the interim is unknown," he said.

The proposal was introduced shortly after Walker took office in February last year. It resulted in a firestorm of opposition and led to huge protests at the state Capitol that lasted for weeks. All 14 Democratic state senators fled the state to Illinois for three weeks in an ultimately failed attempt to stop the law's passage from the Republican-controlled Legislature.

The law required public workers to pay more for their health insurance and pension benefits at the same time it took away their ability to collectively bargain over those issues. Walker argued the changes were needed to help state and local governments save money at a time Wisconsin faced a $3 billion budget shortfall.

"This is a huge victory for Wisconsin workers and a huge victory for free speech," said Democratic Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca. "This decision will help re-establish the balance between employees and their employers."

Anger over the law's passage led to an effort to recall Walker from office. More than 930,000 signatures were collected triggering the June recall election. Walker won and became the first governor in U.S. history to survive a recall.

Read more: http://www.wisn.com/politics/wisconsin-politics/Judge-strikes-down-collective-bargaining-law/-/10057500/16610386/-/y3i5lhz/-/index.html#ixzz26UQX0JjA

6 Comments

6 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by Nevada1 (4024) 1 year ago

Excellent

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (10721) from Phoenix, AZ 1 year ago

Individual freedom is under attack all across the country, while the rights of employers are expanded. This all being done by ONE of the major political parties, perhaps someday OWS will wish to address that.

http://www.thenation.com/blog/169924/racial-burdens-obscured-voter-id-laws#

http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20120914/NEWS03/120919924?tags=%7C62%7C307%7C74%7C278%7C79%7C87#

[-] 1 points by ZenDog (20616) from South Burlington, VT 1 year ago
  • The First Amendment

    • Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

in other words:

  • Congress shall make no law . . . prohibiting . . . the right of the people peaceably to assemble . . .

Union busting is most certainly UnConstitutional and most unAmerican.

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (20419) 1 year ago

Workers' rights, when it comes to setting wages and benefits, are paramount to a healthy economy that works for all people.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Right-On. Down with denial of rights laws.

[-] 1 points by jph (2652) 1 year ago

Should read; "Judge strikes down ANTI-collective bargaining law"