Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: "It is historically always safe to assume that if u see a "protester" being violent, he is probably an undercover cop." - Moore

Posted 3 years ago on Nov. 6, 2011, 6:17 p.m. EST by precipice (220)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

"It is historically always safe to assume that if u see a "protester" being violent, he is probably an undercover cop." -Michael Moore

Cops love violent protests. It means overtime-pay and job security...

FULL STORY http://www.occupyr.com/General/thread.php?id=711

7 Comments

7 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by gestopomilly (497) 3 years ago

well then hopefully that was who the cops shot

[-] 1 points by Skippy2 (485) 3 years ago

Bullshit...watch videos...most violence by 16-18 yearold punks.

[-] 0 points by pinker (586) 3 years ago

read the cop's lips in slo-mo. He tells the guy to back up and is right in his face. rather than an undercover cop, i say this guy is just a pussy and backs up. Is this all ya got to prove all protesters who are violent are undercover cops? Again, if it weren't for the cops being at this little saturday get together, this would not have even made it into the online NYT blog. You need the cops for attention- admit it. If it weren't for arrests, you'd have no coverage.

[-] 0 points by smartguy (180) 3 years ago

If you see a fat ass capitalist bitching about capitalism in 5 minute photo ops, he is probably a hypocrite trying to sell something.

[-] 0 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 3 years ago

"It is historically always safe to assume that if u see a "protester" being violent, he is probably an undercover cop."

Abolutely. Experience teaches us that they are virtually always "AGENTS PROVOCATEURS".

[-] 0 points by pinker (586) 3 years ago

So you're saying that lame dude in orange is an agent provocateur? He didn't provoke shit. He pussies out and steps out of the way.