Forum Post: "It is historically always safe to assume that if u see a "protester" being violent, he is probably an undercover cop." - Moore
Posted 13 years ago on Nov. 6, 2011, 6:17 p.m. EST by precipice
(220)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
"It is historically always safe to assume that if u see a "protester" being violent, he is probably an undercover cop." -Michael Moore
Cops love violent protests. It means overtime-pay and job security...
well then hopefully that was who the cops shot
Bullshit...watch videos...most violence by 16-18 yearold punks.
read the cop's lips in slo-mo. He tells the guy to back up and is right in his face. rather than an undercover cop, i say this guy is just a pussy and backs up. Is this all ya got to prove all protesters who are violent are undercover cops? Again, if it weren't for the cops being at this little saturday get together, this would not have even made it into the online NYT blog. You need the cops for attention- admit it. If it weren't for arrests, you'd have no coverage.
If you see a fat ass capitalist bitching about capitalism in 5 minute photo ops, he is probably a hypocrite trying to sell something.
"It is historically always safe to assume that if u see a "protester" being violent, he is probably an undercover cop."
Abolutely. Experience teaches us that they are virtually always "AGENTS PROVOCATEURS".
So you're saying that lame dude in orange is an agent provocateur? He didn't provoke shit. He pussies out and steps out of the way.