Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Is it time to get rid of Citizens United?

Posted 2 years ago on March 12, 2012, 5:36 p.m. EST by bensdad (8977)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Super PAC Masked by Nonprofit
Michael Beckel and Rachael Marcus

Published: Monday 12 March 2012
In 2011 the super PAC Freedom Works for America received almost half of its $2.7 million from the nonprofit, a legal transfer that skirts disclosure requirements. Super PACs are the perceived demons of the 2012 campaign, with the law allowing them to raise and spend unlimited amounts of dough. But a shadowy sideshow that's gone largely unnoticed is the set of nonprofits affiliated with them, which often provide money to the cash cows — and they don't have to publicly disclose their donors (as super PACs must). "The undisclosed money is far more troubling for the system," says campaign finance lawyer Kenneth Gross.
Freedom Works for America is a case in point. The group, which has attacked GOP pols it finds insufficiently conservative, is located three blocks north of the Capitol. At the same address, sharing the same suite and even some staff, is the headquarters of the similarly named FreedomWorks Inc., a nonprofit (or 501[c][4] group).
In 2011 the super PAC received almost half of its $2.7 million from the nonprofit, a legal transfer that skirts disclosure requirements. Whose cash is it? We aren't allowed to know. Matt Kibbe, who oversees the activities of both groups, says that "to adhere to what the law stipulates" there is a "firewall" between the two. But even by the loose standards of money in politics these days, the arrangement seems rather cozy.
Other groups are doing it, too. The pro-President Obama super PAC, Priorities USA Action, has received $215,234 from its sister non-profit, Priorities USA. Karl Rove's American Crossroads super PAC and its nonprofit sibling, Crossroads GPS, are also expected to be big ad buyers in the general election. Is it all too cozy? Last month, the Internal Revenue Service launched an investigation into the election advocacy of (c)(4) groups that, as nonpolitical entities, enjoy a comfortable tax status.


government OF the people BY the people FOR the people


JOIN US >
Join the NYC OWS - 60 Wall St 6PM every Wednesday Corporations are not People and Money is not Speech Working Group
………….( even if you are not near NYC )

http://www.nycga.net/groups/restore-democracy
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NYCRDWG

1 Comments

1 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by EricAndersonJr (51) from Bloomington, IN 2 years ago

in answer to your question: without a doubt