Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Iran Foreign Ministry Claims Nuclear Scientist Was Executed By CIA

Posted 12 years ago on Jan. 14, 2012, 10:20 p.m. EST by Scout (729)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

"Iran has ripped the scab right off the wound and its foreign ministry has boldly proclaimed that it has "reliable documents and evidence that this terrorist act was planned, guided and supported by the CIA. The documents clearly show that this terrorist act was carried out with the direct involvement of CIA-linked agents." So the ball is now squarely back in America's court, and any further attempts at appeasement, such as the embargo extension was perceived as being, will merely serve to make US foreign policy appear even more toothless. Which Hillary will hardly stomach. So we may well be back at square one (only this time with two aircraft carriers in the Arabian Sea instead of just one)"

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/iran-foreign-ministry-claims-nuclear-scientist-was-executed-cia-nigeria-strike-talks-collapse

38 Comments

38 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by bklynsboy (834) 12 years ago

Fanatical Israel hard right lobby is pushing hard for the US to start another war. Iran, Iraq, Syria are not threats to the US. CIA, state dept and generals agree. These are regional issues; let them spend more lives and treasure; not ours.

[-] 0 points by Scout (729) 12 years ago

have you noticed how many times America or Israel says Iran is a global threat. That is total rubbish and I wish Israel would stop trying to rope in other countries into their very messy Zionist affairs

[-] 1 points by bklynsboy (834) 12 years ago

AIPAC twists presidents arms and own congress.

[-] 1 points by Nordic (390) 12 years ago

Well DUH.

[-] 1 points by Skippy2 (485) 12 years ago

Iran plays chess while we play checkers. Hillary and Obama are unable to confront Iran in a meaningful way. This lack of ability on the administrations part may lead us to another war.

[-] 1 points by zoom6000 (430) from St Petersburg, FL 12 years ago

They said the troops caming home?they not they move them to kwuit and israel . israel???????that is very intersting

[-] 2 points by shadz66 (19985) 12 years ago

@ "zoom" : FYI, "Why is President Obama sending 12, 000 U.S. troops to Libya ?", by Cynthia McKinney ; http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30243.htm . fiat lux ...

[-] 1 points by zoom6000 (430) from St Petersburg, FL 12 years ago

I do`nt think there is boots on the ground in Libya yet., if they are in malta that is mean they watching egypt and back up for isreal., they send 15000 soldier to isreal.,so they are worring for there darling

[-] 1 points by zoom6000 (430) from St Petersburg, FL 12 years ago

Obama policy oprate like mafia instead of going to direct war

[-] 0 points by Scout (729) 12 years ago

the Mafia were honourable - the mob in the White house are as low as you get

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

I will not tolerate US involvement in Iran over 70 year old technology

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by Builder (4202) 12 years ago

Iran's decision mid-last-decade to trade oil in euros placed extra burden on the struggling petrodollar.

Libya also shifted trade away from US paper money, as did Iraq.

Such a fine balance of power resting on meaningless paper.

[-] 1 points by Spade2 (478) 12 years ago

Don't listen to Iran's fear mongering, it's just a bunch of bullshit similar to the Iraq War being total bullshit.

[-] 1 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 12 years ago

The American Empire seems hell-bent upon its own destruction.... WHAT MADNESS!!!

[-] 1 points by Scout (729) 12 years ago

it doesnt surprise me

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 12 years ago

I don't see any reason to believe these claims without evidence. Doing so would be indulging in pseudoscientific type thinking which is not a healthy pass time.

[-] 0 points by owsinlove (83) 12 years ago

Agree the question really is it Massod, CIA, Mi5, or French intelligence maybe a combo, it is not a safe time to be playing with nuclear toys. I'm not sure this is morally right.

[-] 0 points by HarryPairatestes2 (380) from Barrow, AK 12 years ago

If Iran truly had documents showing the CIA was part of the killing of the professor they would have already posted them to all the news agencies. Saying something and proving something are two different things.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

Perhaps so, but I think that counter intelligence rarely has the luxury of being able to prove something.

[-] 0 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 12 years ago

The American Empire seems hell-bent upon its own destruction.... WHAT MADNESS!

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by America921 (161) 12 years ago

I have no problem with killing these people. Iran won't risk open war with us. They don't have the military power to hold us off for more than a month. These people were going to use their knowledge for evil. We cannot let that happen.

[-] 2 points by elpinio (213) 12 years ago

That's what they said about iraq... dumbass

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by Mooks (1985) 12 years ago

I agree. Covert operations like this are obviously preferable when compared to an all out war.

[-] 0 points by America921 (161) 12 years ago

Yes, and unless Iran does something really stupid there is no need for open war.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

Iran will continue to be provoked until it does something stupid. That's the whole purpose of provoking them.

[-] 0 points by Scout (729) 12 years ago

lets face it USA is broke, bankrupt, skint... he he he no more money you war mongrels

" As a reminder Iran made it very clear an escalation in joint US-Israel war game cooperation would be met with yet another miliary exercise out of Iran.

And in other news, in response to the latest discovery that Russia not only was using Syrian ports to park its military ships, but to supply the locals with ammunition we get this:"

Appeasement Arrives: Joint US-Israel Exercise Postponed For "Budget Reasons", US Will Not Enforce No Fly Zone Over Syria

[-] 0 points by Scout (729) 12 years ago

that is such a naive view. China and Russia have already said they would support Iran and Pakistan and North Korea would probably join in. Suddenly you have world war 3 - maybe nuclear.wake up !

[-] -1 points by America921 (161) 12 years ago

No body is going to risk Nuclear War. Your view is such a pessimistic view. China won't go to war with us. They need us without us their economy would downturn. Russia is no worry, they no longer have the military power. North Korea is boxed in. If you want to look at allies, we have England, France, Germany, India, Canada. World War 3 is no where near by. I'm not naive, I realize that the most countries have too much at risk to go to open war.

[-] 1 points by Nordic (390) 12 years ago

And could you explain to me how Iran is a threat, in any way, shape, or form, to the United States, given that they haven't attacked anybody in, oh, 800 years or so, yet have watched their immediate neighbors all around them get invaded by the U.S. in the last ten?

Could you tell me why they're a threat given that Leon Panetta admitted on Meet the Press that Iran is not making a nuclear bomb?

And are you aware that Iran has actively advocated eliminating the U.S. Dollar as the world's foreign reserve currency, and that two other countries that also tried that are now occupied by U.S. forces? And Venezuela is on the same shit list for the same reason?

And are you aware of the amount of oil Iran controls? Like Iraq, Libya, Kuwait and Venezuela?

I breathlessly await your informed response.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

The intention of provocative moves by the west is intended, at the highest levels, those of the financial oligarchs, to incite a nuclear war. They want to reduce global population to about a billion people while they hide in their bunkers and wait until its over to claim what's left.

I think the financial oligarchy will keep trying until it provokes a war, and even if Russia and China don't respond, it will continue provoking until they do, or until they submit totally to the west.

This is primarily a war against Russia and China, since as the west collapses, those countries are rising. The western oligarchs couldn't stand to watch those countries take over leadership of the world while their empire collapses.

[-] 0 points by Scout (729) 12 years ago

sorry neither of us will be around in breathable air if you are wrong. so better not support the war mongerers eh ?

[-] -2 points by America921 (161) 12 years ago

I will go to war if I see it fit. If that makes me a war monger-er then so be it. I am not a pacifist. It is an unrealistic approach to life.

[-] 1 points by Scout (729) 12 years ago

you are a nutcase just like the Zionists in charge of Israel and you will end up destroying humanity

[-] 0 points by America921 (161) 12 years ago

So because if Iran starts setting off nukes, which is HIGHLY unlikely, I would personally see to it that that threat is neutralized, I'm a nutcase.

[-] 1 points by Nordic (390) 12 years ago

What about Israel's nukes? Are you even aware of them?

Hell, Israel is probably the greatest threat to world peace at the moment, closely followed by its lapdog the U.S.

Care to go to war against Israel to protect the peace?

Didn't think so.

[-] 0 points by America921 (161) 12 years ago

I'm worried about Iran because Iran is a rogue nation. I'm also worried about North Korea. I'm not going to war unless someone starts firing off nukes.

[-] 1 points by Nordic (390) 12 years ago

How is Iran a "rogue" nation? Who have they attacked lately? Who are they threatening to attack? Do they fuck around with other countries the way we constantly do? Did they ever overthrow one of OUR Democratically elected leaders? Do you realize that WE overthrew THEIR democratically elected leader in 1953? You might want to read up on some history and learn how the world actually works. The U.S. is NOT the good guy.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 12 years ago

Why don't you worry about the hundreds of nukes that China has, the ten thousand nukes that Russia has, and the hundreds that Israel has which are aimed at Europe?

Your worrying about one nuke that Iran might develop someday? And your in a hurry to go to war with countries that have hundreds and thousands of them?