Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: If a corporation is a person?

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 11, 2011, 9:12 a.m. EST by yarichin (269)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

That means anyone who owns, buys, sells, or trades a corporation, is in violation of laws against slavery. The 1% spent allot of money to make corporations into legal people. I say give them what they want. Charge them with owning slaves.

7 Comments

7 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by bensdad (8977) 12 years ago

An intellectual exercize - or you can DO SOMETHING
Nov 12 6PM 60 Wall St We are the 83%

We have a large number of great, well thought out, COMPLICATED ideas that will require a huge amount of "selling" and “explanation" and will garner GREAT OPPOSITION.
We need to be realistic & pick an issue that is simple – and that is popular -
that 83% of Americans already agree on -
that 76% of Republicans already agree on -
that 56% of TP already agree on -
that will bring together the people in OWS with the people outside of OWS.
Everybody wins!

Our only goal should be to pass a constitutional amendment to counter Supreme Court decisions Citizens United (2010) & Buckley v. Valeo (1976), that enable unlimited amounts of anonymous money to flood into our political system.
“Corporations and organizations are not a persons & have no personhood rights”
and
“money is not free speech”.

We don’t have to explain or persuade people to accept our position – we have to persuade them to ACT based on their own position. Pursuing this goal will prove to the world that we, at OWS, are a serious realistic Movement, with serious realistic goals. Achieving this goal will make virtually every other goal – jobs, taxes, infrastructure, Medicare – much easier to achieve –
by disarming our greatest enemy – GREED.


THE SUCCESS STORY OF THE AMENDING PROCESS The Prohibition movement started as a disjointed effort by conservative teetotalers who thought the consumption of alcohol was immoral. They ransacked saloons and garnered press coverage here and there for a few years. Then they began to gain support from the liberals because many considered alcohol partially responsible for spousal and child abuse, among other social ills. This odd alliance, after many years of failing to influence change consistently across jurisdictions, decided to concentrate on one issue nationally—a constitutional amendment. They pressured all politicians on every level to sign a pledge to support the amendment. Any who did not, they defeated easily at the ballot box since they controlled a huge number of liberal, and conservative and independent swing votes in every election. By being a single-issue constituency attacking from all sides of the political spectrum, they very quickly amassed enough votes (2/3) to pass the amendment in Congress. And, within just 17 months, they were successful in getting ¾ of the state legislatures to ratify the constitutional amendment into law. (Others were ratified even faster: Eight —took less than a year. The 26th, granting 18-year-olds the right to vote, took just 99 days.)


If they could tie the left and right into a success -
If Ohio won. If Arizona won. If Maine won. If Mississippi won - WHY CAN'T WE ??????????


I feel that we should stay with this simple text to overturn CU:
”corporations are not people” and “money is not free speech”
for four simple reasons and one – not so simple:
1
83% of Americans have already opposed CU in the ABC/Washington post poll and the above
IS THEIR POSITION ALREADY.
2
We don’t have to work to convince people on the validity of our position.
3
Simple is almost always better.
4
This simple Amendment is REQUIRED to overturn CU.
And all other electoral reform can be passed through the normal legislative process.

5
OWS and these pages are chock full of ( mostly ) excellent ideas to improve our country.
All of them have strong advocates – and some have strong opposition.
None of them has been “pre-approved” by 83% of Americans !
Pursuing this goal – without additional specifics is exactly what Americans want.
What do we want? Look at that almost endless list of demands – goals - aims.
Tax the rich. End the Fed. Jobs for all, Medicare for all. So easy to state! Can you imagine how hard it would be to formulate a “sales pitch” for any of these to convince your Republican friends to vote for any of them?
83% of Americans have ALREADY “voted” against CU. And 76% of the Rs did too.
All we have to do ask Americans is to pressure their representatives – by letters - emails – petitions.

Wanna take your family on vacation?
Convince the 7 year old and the 10 year old to go to Mt Rushmore.
Then try to convince them to go to Disneyland.
Prioritizing this goal will introduce us to the world – not as a bunch of hippie radical anarchist socialist commie rabblerousers – but as a responsible, mature movement that is fighting for what America wants.


Ohio won. Arizona won. Maine won. Mississippi won -
I feel that using their tactics, and the tactics of the NRA, the AARP an the TP – who all represent a minority – who have successfully used their voting power to achieve their minority goals - plus the Prohibition Amendment tactics – bringing all sides together - is a straight path for us to success that cannot fail to enable us to create and complete one MAJORITY task.

[-] 1 points by JohnsonJaimes (260) from Sanibel, FL 12 years ago

Wow, great point. You're the first I've heard to bring it up. We are becoming wage slaves.

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

A large organization, unlike a private individual, can act unjustly or highhandedly without fear of being brought to account.

The opinion of Manwood, chief Baron [c 1580], was this, as touching Corporations, that they were invisible, immortall, and that they had no soule; and therefore no Subpœna lieth against them, because they have no Conscience nor soule. [1658 E. Bulstrode Reports II. 233] Lord Chancellor Thurlow said [c 1775] that the corporations have neither bodies to be punished nor souls to be damned. [c 1820 J. Poynder Literary Extracts (1844) I. 268] Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose, nor a body to kick. [a 1845 S. Smith in S. Holland Memoir (1855) I. xi.] A corporation is just like any natural person, except that it has no pants to kick or soul to damn, and, by God, it ought to have both. [1932 Ernst & Lindey Hold your Tongue xii.]

Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/corporations-have-neither-bodies-to-be-punished-nor-souls-to-be-damned#ixzz1dPL6ZsZq

[-] 1 points by yarichin (269) 12 years ago

The CEO should always be accountable. As we say in the military you can delegate authority but not responsibility.

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

but because of the way corporations are organized, CEOs are incentivized to care only about their shareholders, not their nation. If we live in a world and no longer a nation, then all Americans should be conditioned to think like CEOs, and not citizens. I don't suggest this for our nation but fair is fair.

[-] 1 points by TheCloser (200) 12 years ago

The humanitarian crimes these Corporate Citizens cause are unconscionable! But that's democracy for you, we mostly accept it.

[-] 1 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

Corporations have no inherent right to free speech!

They do not even have tongues!