Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: HSBC, Executive immunity, and the bluff.

Posted 5 years ago on Dec. 14, 2012, 12:54 p.m. EST by richardkentgates (3269)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

I see all these threads about HSBC but this is not news. The same thing happened in the years following the Great Recession. The same reason the Fed can purposely devalue your money, essentially stealing from the entire country, and I have explained to you all, time and again why.


Executive Order 12333 (1981)

You don't mean shit, I don't mean shit, and these people don't want a solution. They are on this forum because they want you to continue eating the public explanation. War is fought with more than guns as Hillary recently made clear with her comment about the information war. The economy and the citizens of the US are casualties of a war the media ignores and you are too cool to even acknowledge for fear of looking like a tin foil nutter.

If you don't like the answer, fine, but you should know that continuing to ask a question simply because the answer is too spectacular to grasp makes you look just a foolish as touting any conspiracy theory.

To the frauds on the forum, just want to say Fuck You while I am taking the time to post.



Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by OTP (-203) from Tampa, FL 5 years ago


Here's that video of Hillary if anyone hasnt seen it.

Anyone that supports these people are only helping the decay of society.

[-] 1 points by TrevorMnemonic (5827) 5 years ago

The fiasco with HSBC is most certainly news. Have banks been getting away with fraud for a while now? Yes. That's one of the many problems. One of the many reasons why it needs to be in public light every time it happens.

What exactly are you trying to say?

[-] 0 points by richardkentgates (3269) 5 years ago

I'm saying that the excuse of national security to warp and manipulate society and the progress of humanity itself has reached an impasse.

[-] 1 points by TrevorMnemonic (5827) 5 years ago

I gotchya.

They can't expose the evidence of torture. Why not? "National Security."

They can't discuss the specifics of how the kill lists are legal because of "national security"

They can't jail banksters because of "national security"

You have to let us grope you when you travel, you know because of "national security."

[-] 0 points by richardkentgates (3269) 5 years ago

lol, pretty much.