Posted 1 year ago on Oct. 3, 2011, 7:16 p.m. EST by gawdoftruth
from Santa Barbara, CA
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Student 1 points 2 minutes ago
Ok this is getting annoying. What you are describing that you like is SOCIALISM. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism Your own source, Wikipedia, says it means it is state owned OR COMMONLY OWNED and USED. And your definition of socialism is not what socialism is. If thats what it is how would that ever rise as a popular movement? Who would advocate that? lmfao reply permalink ↥ ↧ gawdoftruth (Santa Barbara, CA) 1 points 0 seconds ago
No. What you are doing is conflating assorted systems, failing to grasp what real democracy is and then trying to add in an ideology flavor. I'm 20 phds of knowledge and bored stiff and this is all probably a waste of my time, but what you REALLY WANT is democracy. Calling it socialism proves your a matrix pwn. How would it ever rise as a popular movement? easy? its marketed to rebels without a clue who want to rebel against the corporate oligarchy, so that they accidentally fight for corporate oligarchy, and for an insane ideology which everyone else rightly rejects. Its just like being corralled in on the brooklyn bridge. Instead of just getting arrested tho you are being zombified. We don't need more socialism Zombies.