Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Globalists: The Destruction of the Global Economy Was No Accident

Posted 2 years ago on Feb. 9, 2012, 1:41 p.m. EST by humanityrules (14)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Paul McGuire, NewsWithViews.com: ———————————- February 8th, 2012 | The destruction of the American economy and the dollar did not happen by accident. It was a planned event, like the demise of the euro and other currencies around the world. There is no energy crisis: there are alternative sources of energy and there are vast oil reserves in the United States and around the world. There is no real food shortage, only the manipulation of crops through genetically altered terminator seeds and artificial shortages, for the purpose of population control. Everything we see around us is manufactured crisis that is created to bring about a one world government. In 1917, the Bolshevik or Russian Revolution was financed by the international bankers like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Schiffs, Warburgs, Harrimans and Milers. Many of these same banking families secretly financed Hitler and continue to finance both sides of conflicts in order to establish their world government and profit from it in the process.

Read More @ NewsWithViews.com

8 Comments

8 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by Quark (236) 2 years ago

A new single world government is inevitable. We may get there by crooks and corruption, but when the virtuous finally take control, the meek will inherit the earth. In other words these are the natural rhythms of evolution of bad & good. Let it be and in the end there will be Solidarity. The bad will do their part and without them we wouldn't be able to do our part. Such are the laws of life.

[-] 2 points by Renaye (522) 2 years ago

Why inevitable? Saying inevitable is to say that we don't have the choice. A one world utopia would of course be the ideal, if we could keep ourselves to a kind of peaceful thinking. But the fact is that there are some people who just aren't like that. Also, a one world government isn't possible from the view of leadership. By virtue of leaders' personalities, there is no way that leaders will accept a one world government without first fighting for who will be that world government. Not to mention that when there are not many different sovereign governments, the aptitude for corruption is too sweet for rulers to deny themselves. Much like a corporation with no competition, it becomes tyrannical, and so, with no government opposition to stand in its way, a one world government will invariably become a tyrant to its people. Keeping sovereignty and borders ensures that no one government will take over and that is a matter of choice by a peaceful people who can keep watch over their governments.

[-] 1 points by Quark (236) 2 years ago

I see what you mean, but we don't have a choice. The world is one so one government will one day rule the world. It will probably be China. China is the Sleeping Giant. Any government can become corrupt and it does not logically follow that many corrupt governments are better than one. I would argue it would be easier to keep one government non-corrupt than to keep many governments non-corrupt. I also argue that one government could be more efficient than many governments. Ruling the world as one is the best way to rule a world.

[-] 2 points by hoot (313) 2 years ago

to say that a one world gov is easier to keep non corrupt is false. if there was a one world government, our voices would be worth less than they are today, yes if we all stood together it would be easier. but look at us today america is divide in 3 the ones in control the public left and the public right. my point is we dont agree on most things and that fine but we wont stand together which is clear from ows opinions on libertarians and conservatives and tea party opinions on liberals.

[-] 1 points by Quark (236) 2 years ago

I disagree, it is easier to take care of one government as opposed to many governments. I could use almost any analogy to prove this. I do not follow your logic. Let's agree to disagree.

[-] 1 points by Renaye (522) 2 years ago

And when that one government or one army becomes corrupt and tyrannical...who stops them when there is no other government or army? Just because something is easier doesn't mean it should be done. Should there not be many roadblocks and levels of government to insure that there is no chance for a runaway megalomaniac to garner tyranny?

[-] 1 points by Quark (236) 2 years ago

There would parties & citizens that would be responsible for keeping the system just like any other governments. One government is what we need in order to have justice. Face the facts. Your argument means more corruption because there are more governments to be corrupt. This is why the world is so corrupt because there are too many governments. Your many government idea has failed. It is time to try something that has never been. That is why OWS is a world revolution. Solidarity

[-] -2 points by utahdebater (-72) 2 years ago

Hurray for conspiracy theories!!! I think you've been watching too much Twilight Zone.