Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: Fracking, What's it Look Like?

Posted 11 years ago on April 20, 2013, 11:16 a.m. EST by shoozTroll (17632)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

A view from the ground, and please remember these wells and the damage they cause will be abandoned to the public once the well runs dry.




Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by Narley (272) 11 years ago

Fracking MUST be stopped. Of all the issues OWS supports, this is most important to me. If we corrupt our ground water we will have nothing.

Where I live there is an underground river (Edwards Aquifer) that supports millions of people. If that is polluted we are in deep shit. We must stop it NOW.

[-] 2 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

But they want to sell you bottled water, and jack up the cost of health care(sic).

It's a win, win for WallStreet.


[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

Keep going, you have to see the fleets of idling semis.

Hundreds of them filled with fracking fluids.

And then all the mud and flipped over trucks, not to mention the testimony.

The first pic was done by these guys, and I would tend to think most of their business consists of making the drilling look nice.


These are tight, well planned shots, that don't really show much besides that which is "well manicured".


[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

Beauty's only skin deep, it can get quite ugly underneath, and I've always wondered if at least some of the increasing incidence of sinkholes might be caused by it.



[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

Well, it's not like they made the strawberry farms pay for the damage.


[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

How much water does it take to frack a shale structure?

They crack the shale all up, then they suck it all out.

I still think that causes at least a few sinkholes.

Whether from pumping it out of earth as water the first time, or pumping it back into the earth, filled with chemicals the second time, or when they suck it back out to get to the released oils and gases, the third time, or when they pump it back into the earth again, because they don't want to pay to clean it up the fourth time they handle it.

That's four chances to make a sinkhole, even many miles away from the wellhead.


[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

I understand.


Or maybe it's not so much hate, as it is that they just don't give a fuck.


[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

Exxon threatened to sue if they kept airing it.

so make of that, what you will.


[-] -1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 11 years ago

In compliment - related - in a fashion:

What would you do if getting a drink of clean water required walking miles and miles under a hot sun?

Please sign the petition today!

Tell Congress: Pass the Water for the World Act!

take action

please share it helps!

share on facebook share on twitter share via email

It's easy to take water for granted when it pours from the tap. But across the globe, thousands of families struggle every day to find clean and safe drinking water.

It doesn't have to be that way! The United States Congress has the ability to lead the charge in ensuring all people have easy access to safe, clean drinking water.

The Water for the World Act will help 800 million people around the world get access to clean and safe drinking water.

That access would allow people around the world prevent deadly disease, grow more food, avoid violent conflict, and spend more time pursuing an education and supporting themselves and their families.

Please, take action today! Tell your Member of Congress to fight for life-saving access to clean water and sanitation around the world. care2

Thank you for taking action,

Ellen B. c Care2 and ThePetitionSite Team

What I added to the petition:

Clean water for drinking for sanitation for farming. THIS is the type of aid we should be sending around the world - not sending billions of dollars to governments that may or may not use the money to help their people.


[-] -1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 11 years ago

Tell Energy Secretary Moniz: Don't encourage expanded fracking.

The petition reads: Fracked gas isn't clean energy. Please oppose projects to export fracked gas abroad, which will increase fracking pollution here in America, and keep the world hooked on the fossil fuels which are dumping carbon pollution into our atmosphere, speeding climate change.

Automatically add your name: Sign the petition ►

Dear Dan,

In his climate speech on Tuesday, President Obama took some big steps forward against climate change, but at the same time pushed a dangerous and counterproductive endorsement of expanding natural gas development and fracking. Obama's plan gives implicit support for exporting natural gas, stating that his administration will "encourage the development of a global market for gas."1

If the Obama administration green-lights fracked gas exports, it will encourage more fracking in the United States, endangering our precious water, putting the health of countless Americans at risk and accelerating climate change.

As the Secretary at the Department of Energy, Ernest Moniz is responsible for deciding whether to grant permits allowing the fracking industry to export huge quantities of natural gas overseas.

Shortly after being sworn in, he promised to take more time to study the issue before granting any more permits to export gas. That's a positive development that shows we have momentum in this fight.2 Now we need to build on that momentum by urging him to reject natural gas exports altogether.

Tell Energy Secretary Moniz: Say no to fracking exports and expanded fracking. Click here to sign.

The Energy Department approved its first natural gas export permit in two years just before Moniz was sworn in.3 4 But Moniz's promise to hold off on approving permits until he's undertaken further study is a genuinely encouraging step, and it proves that Moniz has a lot of leverage in the administration to push back against natural gas exports. He should.

Far from being a climate solution, expanded fracking would be a disaster for the climate. Fracking releases huge amounts of methane, an extremely potent greenhouse gas. Fracking is a highly toxic process that contaminates water and releases poisonous air pollution, putting nearby communities at risk. Furthermore, as recent climate disasters like Superstorm Sandy demonstrate, it's dangerous to consider any policy that would dramatically expand fossil fuel extraction in the United States.

Moniz has expressed support for fracked gas in the past, but, now that he's a highly visible public official, he's likely more susceptible to pressure from activists. We need to make it clear that Americans across the country are watching him closely, and expect him to put our health and safety ahead of the financial interests of the fracking industry.

Tell Energy Secretary Moniz: Say no to fracking exports and expanded fracking. Click here to sign.

Thanks for fighting fracking.

Zack Malitz, Campaign Manager CREDO Action from Working Assets

Automatically add your name: Sign the petition ►

Learn more about this campaign

  1. Jenny Mandel, "Obama's climate plan silent on exports but pledges support for global gas markets," EnergyWire, June 27, 2013

  2. "Moniz: LNG applications on hold," The Advocate, May 31, 2013

  3. Matthew Daley, "Energy Dept. backs Texas LNG export plan," Associated Press, May 17, 2013

  4. Steve Hargreaves, "U.S. steps up natural gas exports," CNNMoney, June 4, 2013

FB Share on Facebook Post to your wall

Tw Tweet this Post to Twitter

© 2013 CREDO. All rights reserved.

[-] -1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 11 years ago