Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Found DG with me.

Posted 1 year ago on June 28, 2013, 1:46 a.m. EST by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Want to be a founder of Departmental Governance? Want to learn about it and put it into your own words?

Want to try to think of things no one else has, and try to incorporate the best other systems offered? Debate with others who disagree on the approach?

I want to seek and destroy the flaws of DG and replace them with undeniable logic.

Who will join me early? Who will join late? Who will oppose or ignore it, and how they will feel when they know.

18 Comments

18 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by DebtSUSPENSIONRights (181) 1 year ago

yes, I do that on my Debt Suspension Rights blog. You are welcome to add comments in the comments section. Each article identifies a problem and poses a solution as well. I think its cutting edge stuff.

www.debtsuspensionrights.blogspot.com

[-] 0 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

Thanks!

In Departmental Governance, I could see you employed in the Economics Department public sector and/or a member of an Activist Opposition Party associated with Economics.

[-] 1 points by DebtSUSPENSIONRights (181) 1 year ago

As long as a I get a diploma to hang on a wall.

[-] 1 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

Sure, what would you like it to say?

[-] -1 points by DKAtoday (24970) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Master of the universe - but happy to share.

[-] 1 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

It's in the mail with the bill, cash only, thanks!

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (24970) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

U really shouldn't bill the master of the universe - put it on my tab.

[-] 1 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

What am I, the bank? Jeez!

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (24970) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Lets hope not. What awful kind a karma would that be ?

[-] 1 points by PhatAlbert (4) 1 year ago

lol

[-] 0 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

Wow, you actually just started an account to say that? That's what's funny.

[-] 1 points by PhatAlbert (4) 1 year ago

I started a new account to test something actually. I'm interested in your idea but it needs some elaborating. The GAs from Occupy were a glimpse into how we should go about fixing our government in my opinion.

[-] 0 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

K, sorry. Rather than giving a bunch of stuff to read, why not ask a question? I bet I have a quick, sufficient answer, and can elaborate.

[-] 1 points by PhatAlbert (4) 1 year ago

I wouldn't know where to start. Departmental Governance is a pretty broad term. I just like the idea that you are trying to get people involved and that you accept that some want to lead and some want to follow, since this is the natural preference of people.

[-] 0 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

DG is the system that was designed out of necessity to achieve Responsible Capitalism, which came first. Understanding that DG can't be achieved on its own, the 99% Conglomerate was conceived.

DG is a political system (or form of government) that is compatible with any economic system, and it can be installed before or after capitalism (money market system) expires.

[-] 0 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

If your mind is free, if you have some brain comparable to the previous "founding fathers", if you are not STUCK, let's do this together.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

A lesson I learned along the way is that you have to be able to distinguish between what is a

  1. Policy to be amended when necessary as democratically decided, and

  2. Rule or component of the system construct.

For example, should there be religion or mandatory military time for citizens at age 18? That's for the people.

What are the rules of the Legislative Court? That is part of the construct.

[-] 0 points by Kavatz (464) from Edmonton, AB 1 year ago

Example of what should be democratically decided, not a component of the construct, and not for representatives to have an influential opinion on.

http://occupywallst.org/forum/cannabis-was-americas-number-one-painkiller/