Forum Post: Fight Banks By Becoming Banks Ourselves
Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 19, 2011, 5:49 p.m. EST by atki4564
(1259)
from Lake Placid, FL
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Start the war against Injustice by starting our own banks to double the income of the Bottom 99% of Workers, for many more people will come to your side when you are proactive (for “new” Business & Government solutions), instead of reactive (against “old” Business & Government solutions), which is why what we most immediately need is a comprehensive “new” strategy that implements all our various socioeconomic demands at the same time, regardless of party, and although I'm all in favor of taking down today's ineffective and inefficient Top 1% Management System of Business & Government, there's only one way to do it – by fighting bankers as bankers ourselves, and thus doubling our income from Bank Profits which are 40% of all Corporate Profits; that is, using a Focused Direct Democracy organized according to our current Occupations & Generations. Consequently, I have posted a 1-page Summary of the Strategically Weighted Policies, Organizational Operating Structures, and Tactical Investment Procedures necessary to do this at:
Join http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/StrategicInternationalSystems/ because we need 100,000 “support clicks” at AmericansElect.org in support of the above bank-focused platform.
Most importantly, remember, as cited in the first link, that as Bank Owner-Voters in your 1 of 48 "new" Business Investment Groups (or "new" Congressional Committees) you become the "new" Online Congress, and related “new” Businesses, REPLACING the "old" Congress, and related “old” Businesses, according to your current Occupations & Generations, called a Focused Direct Democracy.
Therefore, any Candidate (or Leader) therein, regardless of party, is a straw man, a puppet, a political opportunist, just like today; what's important is the STRATEGY – the sequence of steps – that the people organize themselves under in Military Internet Formation of their Individual Purchasing Power & Group Investment Power. In this, sequence is key, and if the correct mathematical sequence is followed then it results in doubling the income of the Bottom 99% of Workers from today's Bank Profits, which are 40% of all Corporate Profits.
Why? Because there are Natural Social Laws – in mathematical sequence – that are just like Natural Physical Laws, such as the Law of Gravity. You must follow those Natural Social Laws or the result will be Injustice, War, etc.
The FIRST step in Natural Social Law is to CONTROL the Banks as Bank Owner-Voters. If you do not, you will inevitably be UNJUSTLY EXPLOITED by the Top 1% Management System of Business & Government who have a Legitimate Profit Motive, just like you, to do so.
Consequently, you have no choice but to become Candidates (or Leaders) yourselves as Bank Owner-Voters according to your current Occupations & Generations.
So JOIN the 2nd link, and spread the word, so we can make 100,000 support clicks at AmericansElect.org when called for, at exactly the right time, by an e-mail from that group, in support of the above the bank-focused platform. If so, then you will see and feel how your goals can be accomplished within the above strategy as a “new” Candidate (or Leader) of your current Occupation & Generation.
Not a hope of this happening. The regulations on banking will keep you well out of the game.
I've read the regulations, and with all due respect to you personally, you don't know what you are talking about.
Ok start a bank it's easy. That's why the big ones have so much competition they are shaking right now.
I didn't say it was easy; that is, if you have read the 1st link above. The big banks, which are about 50% of the market, have about 5,000 small banks as their competitors, but you're right, the big banks do have SUBSTANTIALLY more influence than small banks, and a mega-bank, with 4,600 local branches -- nationally -- as I propose will utterly destroy their influence in the future; that is, over an 8-year period of start-ups (and buyouts) as 4,600 "new" Home Town Banks of 65,000 Members, which includes the small banks as well. Why? Because the entire Socioeconomic System revolves around banking, so if the 99% want to SERIOUSLY change the system, then they have no choice but to get real and take ownership of the banking business directly as Step 1. I applaud the spirit of OWS, but most of the people here just don't understand that banks are the main levers of power socioeconomically, for 40% of all Corporate Profits are Banks Profits, so as the saying goes: "money talks, and bullshit walks", right?
I happen to agree with you. I just believe the system is rigged to keep the little guy out by the government and big banks.
Well, the system has rules & regulations which, for the most part, are pretty well-conceived based upon lessons learned in the past as well as a desire for flexibility in the future.
For example, most states require that 25% of the Individual Capital Contributions made to form a Bank come from the bank's "organizers" while only being allowed to ask the public for the other 75% in stock subscriptions. Consequently, that's why I've "organized" all 65,000 Members of any "new" Home Town Bank into 48 "new" Business Investment Groups by Occupation and Generation so that every Member is can be legally viewed as a "Sophisticated Investor", and thus as "organizer", as least as it concern the $6.6M in Individual Business Loans they would be making to their 1 "new" Business replacing their "old" Business. That way, all Individual Capital Contributions can be lowered to $500 apiece if their are 65,000 Members covering all 48 types of Businesses, and the Feds love that idea because it heavily socializes risk, much more so than today's existing banks (and credit unions) who's "organizers" usually consist of 12 or so VERY RICH people on the Board, and another 750-1,000 more VERY RICH people as stockholders (who play no active role bank operations) whereas in our Home Town Banks, all 65,000 Members play an active role in bank operations, called Sophisticated Investors (by law).
So, for this and other reasons, it isn't the Government that would even want to stop us because of the enormous increase in competition we'd be creating in the banking industry by eliminating that 50% of market which is the big banks, the ones who caused the latest disaster, while the 5,000 smaller banks, being much more conservative, due to their smaller size, were unaffected. Why? Because the small banks, due to their size, don't take the kind of mindless unsupervised risks that the big banks take all the time because the big banks have so much influence they can call on Uncle Sam for a bailout every time they screw-up, which is once per generation, as evidenced by economic history. So, the Feds would love this plan and decentralizing 50% of the market from big banks to Home Town Banks is a great idea as far as they are concerned.
No, the real problem is the 99%'s lack of belief that they can take control of their Town (& National) design by becoming Bank Owner-Voters, and therein, Business Owner-Voters as described in the 1st link; that is, if they really thought about it critically, for then they'd see it's an entirely realistic and government-supported plan (unofficially, of course).
Set up a small stand on the sidewalk and start giving out loans to whoever wants one. Do it with play money and don't forget to tell the passers by that their screwed!
I like to do it opposite banks.
I love you, but obviously no one has taught you to READ and THINK critically (about the 1st link above) before you respond LOGICALLY, not EMOTIONALLY. Peace is the absence of all emotion except love, and so is good judgment. And please don't respond with yet another insult just because I criticized your critical thinking abilities, for this only damages your reputation, not mine.
You do have a point, my critical thinking is extremely poor.
I will not insult you for my suggestion (and my entire post) was merely a joke post, a ridiculous idea I decided to create for many reasons, but ultimately few.
Ha, ha, ha, so you were just dicking with me, huh? No offense taken; I appreciate the bump.