Forum Post: Fed States More Growth Needed Before Bailouts Get Pulled Back
Posted 10 years ago on May 30, 2013, 9:37 p.m. EST by OTP
(-203)
from Tampa, FL
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Ironic, eh? The most clear example of everything that is wrong in the world right now gets no MSM coverage.
Monsanto getting a waiver from the duopoly to control your food? Nope, not worthy.
AP openly stating it needs permission from the administration to publish? Nope.
Bailouts. Still going on. 5 years later. 85 billion a month. 28.3 per COUNTY. All going to the rich. Taken from the rest.
NO COVERAGE.
Someone remind me again why anyone is clinging to this system and begging these sociopaths to save them?
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/22/us-usa-fed-idUSBRE94L0JS20130522
Uh, lemme see if I remember this right. . . .
Oh yeah, it's because "the Dems can be made to serve the 99%!"
Bwahahahah.
Oh shit, here come the stinkles, heheheh.
No worries. QE is not impacting the dollar as it was, so when the investors pull back at the end of the season as they do every year, the first bank(s) will close a day without enough assets to cover their deposits (thanks to the blending of investment and deposit banking) and we will see a repeat of the domino effect the caused the initial recession. The only people that won't be protesting WallSt by the end of the year will be those who work on WallSt, and maybe even some of them will protest. When it comes I'm just going to point and laugh.
Where are you located?
Where are you located?