Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes.

Posted 2 months ago on Aug. 6, 2014, 7:36 p.m. EST by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

9/11: A Conspiracy Theory https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98 corbettreport Transcript and sources: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=2594 Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes.

(Watch French, German, Spanish, Italian, Hebrew or Portuguese translations of this video.)

TRANSCRIPT: On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with boxcutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily-defended airspace in the world, overpowering the passengers and the military combat-trained pilots on 4 commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor.

These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who liked to drink alcohol, snort cocaine, and live with pink-haired strippers, managed to knock down 3 buildings with 2 planes in New York, while in Washington a pilot who couldn’t handle a single engine Cessna was able to fly a 757 in an 8,000 foot descending 270 degree corskscrew turn to come exactly level with the ground, hitting the Pentagon in the budget analyst office where DoD staffers were working on the mystery of the 2.3 trillion dollars that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced “missing” from the Pentagon’s coffers in a press conference the day before, on September 10, 2001.

Luckily, the news anchors knew who did it within minutes, the pundits knew within hours, the Administration knew within the day, and the evidence literally fell into the FBI’s lap. But for some reason a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists demanded an investigation into the greatest attack on American soil in history.

The investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest and a cover up from start to finish. It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed. It failed to mention the existence of WTC7, Able Danger, Ptech, Sibel Edmonds, OBL and the CIA, and the drills of hijacked aircraft being flown into buildings that were being simulated at the precise same time that those events were actually happening. It was lied to by the Pentagon, the CIA, the Bush Administration and as for Bush and Cheney…well, no one knows what they told it because they testified in secret, off the record, not under oath and behind closed doors. It didn’t bother to look at who funded the attacks because that question is of “little practical significance“. Still, the 9/11 Commission did brilliantly, answering all of the questions the public had (except most of the victims’ family members’ questions) and pinned blame on all the people responsible (although no one so much as lost their job), determining the attacks were “a failure of imagination” because “I don’t think anyone could envision flying airplanes into buildings ” except the Pentagon and FEMA and NORAD and the NRO.

The DIA destroyed 2.5 TB of data on Able Danger, but that’s OK because it probably wasn’t important.

The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that’s OK because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping.

NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC7′s collapse, but that’s OK because knowing how they made their model of that collapse would “jeopardize public safety“.

The FBI has argued that all material related to their investigation of 9/11 should be kept secret from the public, but that’s OK because the FBI probably has nothing to hide.

This man never existed, nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention, and if you say otherwise you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist and deserve to be shunned by all of humanity. Likewise him, him, him, and her. (and her and her and him).

Osama Bin Laden lived in a cave fortress in the hills of Afghanistan, but somehow got away. Then he was hiding out in Tora Bora but somehow got away. Then he lived in Abottabad for years, taunting the most comprehensive intelligence dragnet employing the most sophisticated technology in the history of the world for 10 years, releasing video after video with complete impunity (and getting younger and younger as he did so), before finally being found in a daring SEAL team raid which wasn’t recorded on video, in which he didn’t resist or use his wife as a human shield, and in which these crack special forces operatives panicked and killed this unarmed man, supposedly the best source of intelligence about those dastardly terrorists on the planet. Then they dumped his body in the ocean before telling anyone about it. Then a couple dozen of that team’s members died in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan.

This is the story of 9/11, brought to you by the media which told you the hard truths about JFK and incubator babies and mobile production facilities and the rescue of Jessica Lynch.

If you have any questions about this story…you are a batshit, paranoid, tinfoil, dog-abusing baby-hater and will be reviled by everyone. If you love your country and/or freedom, happiness, rainbows, rock and roll, puppy dogs, apple pie and your grandma, you will never ever express doubts about any part of this story to anyone. Ever.

This has been a public service announcement by: the Friends of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA, SEC, MSM, White House, NIST, and the 9/11 Commission. Because Ignorance is Strength.

21 Comments

21 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by pigeonlady (207) from Brooklyn, NY 2 months ago

Wasn't Bin Laden an aristocrat? We all know he was wealthy. He just hid in palace basements of relatives and associates until investigations got too close, then he was asked to leave, and went to an area where the isolation would allow better defense, the neighbors so impoverished they were grateful for the work and money and likely to keep silent. Whether or not he acted with incentive or permission or what he really did is another issue, as is what the Afghans believed. BTW I also love pigeons. Rock on, dude.

[-] 2 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 2 months ago

well he was no pauper.

[-] 2 points by turbocharger (1491) 2 months ago

Haven't seen that in a while, lol.

[-] 2 points by Nevada1 (4790) 2 months ago

WTC7 reported down by reporter, while still in view behind her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s

[-] -2 points by shortNbaldNfatBUTSexy (-79) from New York, NY 2 months ago

That was debunked years ago. Get with the times.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8

[-] 2 points by Nevada1 (4790) 2 months ago

Trashy edit --- MSM damage control

[-] -1 points by shortNbaldNfatBUTSexy (-79) from New York, NY 2 months ago

Yes your point?

You don't like having someone question your nonsense?

You are used to discussing with your gullible friends. Is that it.

[-] 4 points by trashyharry (2896) from Waterville, NY 2 months ago

You are saying that the Infamous Hani Hanjour was able to enter the cockpit of AA 77 without opening the door,and force the 2 seasoned pilots Charles Burlingame and David Charlebois to meekly surrender their aircraft without a struggle because they were threatened with a box cutter-in 180 seconds.Even if they had both been instantly killed with firearms,it would have taken longer than that just to move the bodies out of the way.Then,you are saying that Hani Hanjour successfully engaged and disengaged the auto pilot several times during the flight,even though no evidence exists that he had ever flown a 757-in real life or simulator.There exists no evidence at all that anybody on the face of this planet taught Hani Hanjour how to operate the on board computer of a Boeing 757.If he was never taught how to engage and disengage the auto,he could not have done it.According to the official narrative,the crew was cowering in the back of the plane.It's a shameful defamation of people who are no longer alive to defend themselves and an Abominable Falsehood.The crew would have fought the hijackers to the death right there in the cockpit.

[-] 3 points by MattHolck0 (1733) 2 months ago

as long as I can blame someone else when my government drops bombs

I don't care who did it

[-] 5 points by trashyharry (2896) from Waterville, NY 2 months ago

Now people are saying elsewhere on the forum that we should not be discussing the 9/11 issue here.I would tend to agree with that,because such discussions tend to take on a life of their own.But it is related to one of our central problems-war profiteering and militarism which is so loved by capitalists,and promoted by them to the detriment of everyone else.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by Nevada1 (4790) 2 months ago

Trashy

[-] -3 points by shortNbaldNfatBUTSexy (-79) from New York, NY 2 months ago

Lol, Truthers are all the same. They break down in front of evidence and become like monkeys only able to blurt simple animal like sounds.

[-] 2 points by Nevada1 (4790) 2 months ago

Trashy

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 2 months ago

you are right. the offician narrative is 100% accurate and i have no reason to question anything that my government ever says especially when it comes to matters of terrorism and war.

Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/index.html

LBJ Tapes on the Gulf of Tonkin Incident http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB132/tapes.htm

i am just a nutter.

[-] -2 points by shortNbaldNfatBUTSexy (-79) from New York, NY 2 months ago

you are right. the offician narrative is 100% accurate and i have no reason to question anything that my government ever says especially when it comes to matters of terrorism and war.

Nobody said that.

Questioning is important. That's why 9/11 was the most investigated event in history. Many people wanted many questions answered. Well, questioning is important, but being able to accept answers supported by evidence also is.

What's the point of questioning if you can't differentiate between the stupid moronic answers provided by conspiracy theorists vs the evidence-based answers provided by groups like NIST and Popular Mechanics?

i am just a nutter.

Yes you are.

[-] 3 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 2 months ago

investigated by whom? paid for by whom? were the president and vice president and members of the administration and intelligence community questioned on the events and the results of such events made public? NO.... you are right i can't accept answers because i don't have any.

[-] -2 points by shortNbaldNfatBUTSexy (-79) from New York, NY 2 months ago

Richard Cage from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has been collection donations for years and doing nothing. Why doesn't he pay for an investigation to shut you guys up once and for all?

[-] -2 points by shortNbaldNfatBUTSexy (-79) from New York, NY 2 months ago

Many various groups. The government made investigations, also third parties like Popular Mechancs. Various political analysts and intellectuals like Hitchens and Chomsky pronounced themselves.

you are right i can't accept answers because i don't have any.

Well, then I suggest you start reading. The answers are there. Again, the most investigated event in history. By far.

The 9/11 commission is extremely detailed and fully supported by mountains of evidence.

[-] 2 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 2 months ago

the 9-11 commission is a joke. sophist exposed.

[Removed]

[Removed]