Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: Do the Sandy Hook shootings fit a massacre model?

Posted 5 years ago on Dec. 24, 2012, 11:49 a.m. EST by PublicCurrency (1387)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Who could possibly benefit from the massacre of children? What possible motive is there for such a heinous act? Is there a model or operative pattern to the shootings?




Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by Middleaged (5140) 5 years ago

Great link, I might use some quotes.

[-] 2 points by Nevada1 (5843) 5 years ago

When Corporate military contractors stop cars at checkpoints, and pull citizens daughters out, then people will understand that giving up rights to the federal government, was a mistake.

[-] 1 points by stevebol (1269) from Milwaukee, WI 5 years ago

In the US many people will say anything to sell something. We're much more of a business than a country in this sense. Gun owners can't face the reality that the goal of gun makers is to sell as many as possible. Nothing, no event will distract them from their goal. Follow the money.

[-] 1 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 5 years ago

Here’s a history of what happens after governments have disarmed their citizens:

1911 – Turkey disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.

1929 – Russia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.

1935 – China disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.

1938 – Germany disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 16 million Jews.

1956 – Cambodia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.

1964 – Guatamala disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.

1970 – Uganda disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.

[Editor: You can argue about the numbers, but the point here is that disarmed citizens are vulnerable, and that there are many historical examples of disarmed citizens being killed and oppressed by their own government. The excuse given by authorities that they need to take guns away from citizens in order to lower crime rates is not supported by facts. Even if a government does not turn on its own citizens after disarming them, people are less safe - because unarmed citizens are easy targets to criminals. Over and over again, it has been clearly shown that taking guns away from citizens does not lead to a decrease in crime but rather a dramatic increase.]

Australia has disarmed it’s citizens, and a year later the homicide rate in the largest province is up 300%. The burglaries of seniors is “dramatically” up.

I guess the criminals did not turn their weapons in. Only the innocent law abiding citizens turned in weapons.

In US cities with the highest crime rates, taking guns away from the citizens has not lowered the homicide rate. All it has done is to make it easier for criminals to operate.

The 2nd amendment is not about duck hunting, or deer hunting. It is about having the ability and the right to defend oneself and your family. It doesn’t matter if that threat is a burglar, or the Federal Government. A disarmed population is fair game for any president who may be aspiring to become a dictator. Having its citizens armed was the plain and simple intent of the founding fathers of our country.

[-] 1 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 5 years ago


So if all guns were confiscated and more laws are passed prohibiting gun ownership, would humanity be safe from gun violence?


Ask Mexico where gun ownership is prohibited. Oh wait . . . how could 60,000 people have died down there from gun violence in the last six years if was illegal to own guns? Did criminals somehow get their hands on guns in Mexico?

Did you know the King of England tried to confiscate the colonists’ firearms?

Did you know criminals hate lighted areas at night, dogs, and an armed citizenry?

You remember anything on the current scale of mass shootings happening in the 1940s? 50s? 60s? 70s? 80s?

Me either. The faux wars and “terrorist attacks” and shootings began in the  90s and gained momentum over the last decade; caused by a parade of lone creeps, we were told, through MSM propaganda outlets.

All lies, in my opinion.

What the world senses and is smelling right about now, thanks to the Internet, is the putrid stench of a psychopathic evil run amok around the planet with all the politicians, money, arms, and armies pursuing The Plan. They have no heart, soul, or conscience and live to accumulate earth’s resources and human control under the watchful eye of the money masters with humanity to be thinned, worked, killed, bred, or discarded like so much chattel to achieve their end.- W. R. McAfee, Sr.