Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: David Graeber explains stuff Concerning the Violent Peace-Police An Open Letter to Chris Hedges

Posted 2 years ago on Feb. 16, 2012, 2:14 p.m. EST by ShubeLMorgan2 (1088) from New York, NY
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

http://thedailyoccupation.org/op-eddavid-graeber-explains-the-black-bloc/

[Op-Ed] David Graeber explains the Black Bloc On 5:54 , February 11 2012 Graeber was a member of the group that conceived Occupy in the first place. As an expansion of the previous post, here he provides a rebuttal to Chris Hedges and a handy primer on Black Bloc protest tactics. “Diversity of tactics” is not a “Black Bloc” idea. The original GA in Tompkins Square Park that planned the original occupation, if I remember, adopted the principle of diversity of tactics (at least it was discussed in a very approving fashion), at the same time as we all also concurred that a Gandhian approach would be the best way to go. This is not a contradiction: “diversity of tactics” means leaving such matters up to individual conscience, rather than imposing a code on anyone. Partly,this is because imposing such a code invariably backfires. In practice, it means some groups break off in indignation and do even more militant things than they would have otherwise, without coordinating with anyone else—as happened, for instance, in Seattle. The results are usually disastrous. After the fiasco of Seattle, of watching some activists actively turning others over to the police—we quickly decided we needed to ensure this never happened again. What we found that if we declared “we shall all be in solidarity with one another. We will not turn in fellow protesters to the police. We will treat you as brothers and sisters. But we expect you to do the same to us”—then, those who might be disposed to more militant tactics will act in solidarity as well, either by not engaging in militant actions at all for fear they will endanger others (as in many later Global Justice Actions, where Black Blocs merely helped protect the lockdowns, or in Zuccotti Park, where mostly people didn’t bloc up at all) or doing so in ways that run the least risk of endangering fellow activists. Read more at n+1

http://nplusonemag.com/concerning-the-violent-peace-police

5 Comments

5 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY 2 years ago

"All this is secondary. Mainly I am writing as an appeal to conscience. Your conscience, since clearly you are a sincere and well-meaning person who wishes this movement to succeed. I beg you: Please consider what I am saying. Please bear in mind as I say this that I am not a crazy nihilist, but a reasonable person who is one (if just one) of the original authors of the Gandhian strategy OWS adopted—as well as a student of social movements, who has spent many years both participating in such movements, and trying to understand their history and dynamics.

I am appealing to you because I really do believe the kind of statement you made is profoundly dangerous.

The reason I say this is because, whatever your intentions, it is very hard to read your statement as anything but an appeal to violence. After all, what are you basically saying about what you call “Black Bloc anarchists”?

1) they are not part of us

2) they are consciously malevolent in their intentions

3) they are violent

4) they cannot be reasoned with

5) they are all the same

6) they wish to destroy us

7) they are a cancer that must be excised

Surely you must recognize, when it’s laid out in this fashion, that this is precisely the sort of language and argument that, historically, has been invoked by those encouraging one group of people to physically attack, ethnically cleanse, or exterminate another—in fact, the sort of language and argument that is almost never invoked in any other circumstance. After all, if a group is made up exclusively of violent fanatics who cannot be reasoned with, intent on our destruction, what else can we really do? This is the language of violence in its purest form. Far more than “fuck the police.” To see this kind of language employed by someone who claims to be speaking in the name of non-violence is genuinely extraordinary. I recognize that you’ve managed to find certain peculiar fringe elements in anarchism saying some pretty extreme things, it’s not hard to do, especially since such people are much easier to find on the internet than in real life, but it would be difficult to come up with any “Black Bloc anarchist” making a statement as extreme as this.

Even if you did not intend this statement as a call to violence, which I suspect you did not, how can you honestly believe that many will not read it as such?..."

[-] 4 points by ShubeLMorgan2 (1088) from New York, NY 2 years ago

I remember we had "Peace police" during the Vietnam war demos. They did everything they could to discredit and restrain the righteously angry youth in the hope that this way they could reach the "silent majority" who simply loved the war and hated black people, period.

[-] 3 points by idontexist (24) 2 years ago

lol

[-] 2 points by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY 2 years ago

right.

[Removed]