Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: david & charlie & scott

Posted 2 years ago on March 5, 2012, 9:21 a.m. EST by bensdad (8977)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

19 Comments

19 Comments


Read the Rules

[Removed]

[-] -2 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

that's incorrect the ducks should be spelling Public Sector Unions. they are the ones stealing tax money.

[-] 3 points by shooz (17960) 2 years ago

You're just saying that, because you like it when (R)epelican'ts take away peoples rights, as long as they're not your rights.

[-] -3 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

you are just saying that because you don't care about public sector unions abuse of the tax payers. What rights are you talking about anyway? the right to be a lazy bad, teacher with a pension for life.

[-] 3 points by shooz (17960) 2 years ago

They won the right to collective bargaining, you want to take that right away.

BS invectives won't change that simple fact.

You are an anti rights activist.

[-] 0 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

public sector unions (i don't know why i wasting my time with you but..) members are forced to join the union and forced to pay dues. the dues then go to help elect democrats legislators and executive leaders. These union supporting government legislators then 'negociate' with the unions. Negociate means to give them what they want, to hell with the tax payers. The people are sick of this why do you think Walker, Christie and other good conservative governors were elected. Well punk why?

[-] 2 points by BradB (2693) from Washington, DC 2 years ago

because you all are fascists

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 2 years ago

cause the boss man ain't gonna let you organize yourselves

speak for yourself and get a ticket to the cannery

[-] 1 points by shooz (17960) 2 years ago

All that BS, still doesn't change the simple fact that you are an anti rights activist.

That YOU, want to limit someone else's rights.

What rights would you like limited on yourself?

[-] 0 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

there are no such 'rights' for public sector unions in the constitution. President Truman smartly denied federal employees that right unionize with collective bargaining. now we need , and will, do the same with state, city public employees.

[-] 1 points by shooz (17960) 2 years ago

Things change. He bombed Japan too. do you still want to do that again?

You still want to limit someone else's rights.

You still remain an anti rights activist.

[-] -1 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

you must be ex union, perhaps a retired teacher? There are no 'rights' for collective bargaining. Tell me where they are listed.

[-] 1 points by shooz (17960) 2 years ago

Assumption is all you have.

Don't lay it on me when you're the ass.

You remain an anti rights activist, until you prove otherwise.

If you can.

[-] 0 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

you are the anti tax-payer activist.

[-] 1 points by shooz (17960) 2 years ago

BS!

Teabaggers raised my taxes!!

LIARS!

You are an anti rights activist!

[-] -1 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

whenever you say Liars, i know that you have lost the argument. Carlitini99 1: Shooz 0

[-] 1 points by shooz (17960) 2 years ago

You ended it with your assumptions.

From -59, you have a ways to go.

That still won't change the fact that yo are an anti-rights activist.

It defines your entire campaign on this forum.

[-] -1 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

i wasn't even paying attention . is -59 my score. All right!

[-] 0 points by Carlitini99 (-167) 2 years ago

O'Donnell what a MSNBC joke. Liberals can't take credit for half of those things! have you even read the list?