Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: Critics Again Target Early-Release Prison Program

Posted 5 years ago on March 24, 2013, 3:05 p.m. EST by GirlFriday (17435)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Some lawmakers in the legislature's Republican minority have been trying to kill the program since before it was enacted in 2011. On Friday they brought the matter to a hearing before the judiciary committee in the form of Senate Bill 123. The measure, sponsored by Sen. Joe Markley, R-Southington, and others, would scrap the early-release program.

"I understand the salutary effects of the policy,'' Sen. John Kissel, an Enfield Republican, said at an information session before the hearing. "The one that's probably most important to me is the beneficial impact it has on corrections officers. I think there is a benefit to incentivizing good behavior, even with the most dangerous of our inmates.''

But Kissel, the ranking Republican on the committee, said that the state owes victims an assurance that violent criminals serve the sentences imposed on them by the court.

Michael Lawlor, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's undersecretary for criminal justice issues, said that violent offenders are serving more of their original sentences than they were before the program was established.

"It's a matter of fact that violent offenders after the risk-reduction system was implemented are actually being held in for longer than they were before,'' Lawlor told the committee. "We have not released violent offenders before they have served 85 percent of their original sentence, and that's by design."

Risk-reduction credits are among the myriad of criminal justice policy changes enacted in response to the murders of three members of the Petit family in Cheshire in 2007.

Under the system, inmates may earn up to five days a month off of their sentences for good behavior and participation in educational classes, drug treatment and other programs that aim to reduce recidivism. The credits can be revoked if prisoners misbehave or fail to comply with the program.

Most other states, including Texas, Kansas and North Carolina, have similar policies of offering the incentive of early release for good behavior in prison. Lawlor said that Connecticut's policy is far more stringent than those used elsewhere.

Read the rest here



Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 5 years ago

The vast majority of non violent offenders don't belong in jail and in the past would have never been in jail.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 5 years ago

Yes, they were. It wasn't until the Gideon v Wainwright case that you saw a mass exodus.

[-] 1 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 5 years ago

Not true because in the past many were never charged and punishment/retribution was dished out outside of court. For example in the past men would be put in the drunk tank and let out in the morning now they get out when they get bail.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 5 years ago

Oh it is very true. Go back and read the information on Gideon v Wainwright. It is the right to counsel case. This occurred long before the movie came out.

[-] 1 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 5 years ago

This does not make what I have stated invalid.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 5 years ago

Ok, but that is a drunk tank.

After Gideon v Wainwright about 975 prisoners were released in Florida. That's just Florida.