Posted 7 years ago on March 13, 2013, 10:02 a.m. EST by analystwanabe99
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
[Supreme Court Considering Case That Defies Citizens United Ruling]
The majority's written decision was succinct and straight-forward. In ruling that "there can be no serious doubt that" the Citizens United decision applies to Montana state law, the Court wrote that "political speech does not lose First Amendment protection simply because its source is a corporation."
Insidious! adjective 1. intended to entrap or beguile: an insidious plan. 2. stealthily treacherous or deceitful: an insidious enemy. 3. operating or proceeding in an ... One word sums it up. . . .