Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: BUSH... ooops I mean OBAMA won't apologize for Deadly raid in Pakistan

Posted 10 years ago on Dec. 1, 2011, 5:38 p.m. EST by theaveng (602)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Barack Obama went around the world shortly after becoming president to apologize to Europe, Arabia, and other nations for the actions of the U.S. (2002 -08) and his predecessor (George "duh" Bush), but apparently he's not willing to apologize for more recent actions that occurred from 2009 to the present:

"Days after a NATO airstrike attacked a Pakistani base and killed two dozen soldiers, the White House says that President Obama does not plan to offer an apology for the executions."

CONTINUED ON RT.com - http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-wont-apologize-pakistanis-795/



Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by shadz66 (19985) 10 years ago

"Nato May Reap What They Sow in Pakistan" : by George Galloway ; http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29873.htm . Tch !

[-] 1 points by OWSisawaste (133) 10 years ago

WHY THE HELL DID HE APOLOGIZE in the first place? Obama is a moron is soooo many ways but at least he finally decides to grow a pair and airstrike some people.....granted he is one of the worst presidents we have had but at least he did something. Besides Bush did the right thing by going to war....he tried to do what we should be doing now....just those damn peace loving hippies got in the way.

[-] 1 points by NintyNiner (93) 10 years ago

Dude I bet Obama made a threat if Pakistan didn't get inline we would kick them in the nuts. So we did, now they better get inline because we need another war because Irag war is winding down and already high unemployment. Lobbyists are all over this one! Money and reasoning will win out since the U.S. is quickly aquiring middle eastern assets which a trend has started. Problem with Pakistan they have nukes so these greedy lobbyists could get us killed!

[-] 1 points by OWSisawaste (133) 10 years ago

Well first off Pakistan may or may not use those nukes.... but the fact that we keep playing pussyfoot with them is not helping show the world that the US means business...."and kicking them in the nuts" we killed a Terrorist that most of the world wanted dead.....he just happened to be in pakistan....we did not kick any country in the nuts we kicked the terrorist in the nuts

[-] 0 points by theaveng (602) 10 years ago

You're probably correct.

[-] 0 points by unoccupywallstreet (81) 10 years ago

He should have never made apologizes in the first place. Why do more?

[-] 0 points by theaveng (602) 10 years ago

Whether or not he should, or not..... it's now clear that Obama did his 2009 apology tour for political points. It was a way to denigrate Bush, while he continued Bush's same policy of murdering innocents overseas.

WE have killed more people than Bin Laden did on 9/11. WE are the true terrorists. Yes I know..... the truth hurts.

[-] 1 points by unoccupywallstreet (81) 10 years ago

Yes, a ten year war (really two wars) will claim more lives than a single incident. You're a genius. Only it's not a bunch of innocents as you claim. What facts are you going off of? By the way, the muslims have probably killed more of their own people than we have. Massive bombs in public areas sound familair? While you were posting on your blog I was in Iraq for three deployments. Get a clue.

[-] 0 points by theaveng (602) 10 years ago

Only it's not a bunch of innocents as you claim.

Yeah I'm sure the 30,000 Iraqi and Afghani children we killed were really dangerous. What kind of weak nation fears kiddies???

Had we NOT started a war after 9/11, and instead handled it the way we handled the McVeigh case (mourn the loss, increase security, and move on), then 100,000 more Iraqis and Afghans would be alive today instead of wormfood.

Check out this video of a little girl with her jaw blown-off. WE are the ones responsible for her pain and suffering (and 10s of thousands like her). http://youtu.be/8PyWvnco2-E

[-] 1 points by unoccupywallstreet (81) 10 years ago

How many of those kids would have been alive under Saddam and Taliban rule? What do you think was going on over there before we stepped in? Peaceful nations were nobody suffered? There will always be civilian casualties in war (have been since the beginning of time), but that doesn't mean we target civilians. The muslim extrimists on the other hand specifically target civilians (9/11). They still target their own people today. You think just increasing security is going to be enough? That's a very reactive approach. The best thing to do is be proactive and eliminate the threat. Why don't you go find videos of all the atrocities that the muslim extremists commit, read about the kind of shit that Saddam and his people did, then compare that to what we've done.