Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: ATTENTION Gun Debaters…Please Read This Entire Article…‘The Riddle of the Gun’ By Sam Harris

Posted 1 year ago on Jan. 11, 2013, 2:49 a.m. EST by KevinPotts (363)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

ATTENTION Gun Debaters…Please Read This Entire Article…‘The Riddle of the Gun’ By Sam Harris
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-riddle-of-the-gun [ Excerpts]

“Fantasists and zealots can be found on both sides of the debate over guns in America. On the one hand, many gun-rights advocates reject even the most sensible restrictions on the sale of weapons to the public. On the other, proponents of stricter gun laws often seem unable to understand why a good person would ever want ready access to a loaded firearm. Between these two extremes we must find grounds for a rational discussion about the problem of gun violence.”

“Of course, owning a gun is not a responsibility that everyone should assume. Most guns kept in the home will never be used for self-defense. They are, in fact, more likely to be used by an unstable person to threaten family members or to commit suicide. However, it seems to me that there is nothing irrational about judging oneself to be psychologically stable and fully committed to the safe handling and ethical use of firearms—if, indeed, one is.”

“Many proponents of gun control have observed that the AR 15, the gun that Adam Lanza used to murder 20 children in Newtown, is now the most popular rifle in America. But only 3 percent of murders in the U.S. are committed with rifles of any type.”

“Another problem with liberal dreams of gun control is that the kinds of guns used in the vast majority of crimes would not fall under any plausible weapons ban. And advocates of stricter gun laws who claim to respect the rights of “sportsmen” or “hunters,” and to recognize a legitimate need for “home defense,” simply give the game away at the outset. The very guns that law-abiding citizens use for recreation or home defense are, in fact, the problem.

In the vast majority of murders committed with firearms—even most mass killings—the weapon used is a handgun. Unless we outlaw and begin confiscating handguns, the weapons best suited for being carried undetected into a classroom, movie theater, restaurant, or shopping mall for the purpose of committing mass murder will remain readily available in the United States. But no one is seriously proposing that we address the problem on this level. In fact, the Supreme Court has recently ruled, twice (in 2008 and 2010), that banning handguns would be unconstitutional.

Nor is anyone advocating that we deprive hunters of their rifles. And yet any rifle suitable for killing deer is just the sort of gun that will allow even an unskilled shooter to wreak absolute havoc upon innocent men, women, and children at a range of several hundred yards. There is, in fact, no marksman on earth who can shoot a handgun as accurately at distance as you would be able to shoot a rifle fitted with a scope after a few hours of practice. This difference in accuracy between short and long guns must be experienced to be understood. Having understood it, you will in no way be consoled to learn that a madman ensconced on the rooftop of a nearby building is armed merely with a “hunting rifle” that is legal in all 50 states.

The problem, therefore, is that with respect to either factor that makes a gun suitable for mass murder—ease of concealment (a handgun) or range (a rifle)—the most common and least stigmatized weapons are among the most dangerous. Gun-control advocates seem perversely unaware of this. As a consequence, we routinely hear the terms “semi-automatic” and “assault weapon” intoned with misplaced outrage and awe. (…)”

"According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report, 47 percent of all murders in the U.S. are committed with handguns. Again, only 3 percent are committed with rifles (of any type). (...)"

"Regarding ammunition itself, there is not much more to say, because any type suitable for home defense or hunting—and, therefore, bound to remain legal as long as guns are sold—is also perfect for killing innocent people. The only other variable to consider is the number of rounds a gun can hold, because this dictates the frequency with which a shooter must pause to reload. Here the path to increased public safety is reasonably clear. In California and New York, for instance, one cannot buy magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. As a consequence, the moment at which a shooter can be tackled by bystanders comes after every 10 shots. Ten is a lot better than 30 (...)"

"Eighty percent of the people languishing in our maximum-security prisons will eventually be released back into society—many having become more violent for their time behind bars—and 70 percent of those will return to prison after committing further crimes. We live in a country where nonviolent drug offenders receive life sentences but a man who rapes a fifteen-year-old girl and cuts her arms off with a hatchet can be paroled for good behavior after eight years (only to kill again). I do not know what explains this impossible distortion of priorities, but given that it exists, I believe that good, trustworthy, and well-trained people should have guns."

“One of the greatest impediments to actually solving the riddle of guns in our society is the pious concern that many people have about the intent of the Second Amendment. It should hardly need to be said that despite its brilliance and utility, the Constitution of the United States was written by men who could not possibly have foreseen every change that would occur in American society in the ensuing centuries. Even if the Second Amendment guaranteed everyone the right to possess whatever weapon he or she desired (it doesn’t), we have since invented weapons that no civilian should be allowed to own. In fact, it can be easily argued that original intent of the Second Amendment had nothing to do with the right of self-defense—which remains the ethical case to be made for owning a firearm. The amendment seems to have been written to allow the states to check the power of the federal government by maintaining their militias. Given the changes that have occurred in our military, and even in our politics, the idea that a few pistols and an AR 15 in every home constitutes a necessary bulwark against totalitarianism is fairly ridiculous. If you believe that the armed forces of the United States might one day come for you—and you think your cache of small arms will suffice to defend you if they do—I’ve got a black helicopter to sell you.”

4 Comments

4 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by Gillian (1842) 1 year ago

Where did you get your black helicopter? Walmart? I want one! hahaha The NRA and their excuse of needing to defend themselves against the gov't is really pertains to something along the lines of civil war, not so much the individual. However, why have they not marched to Washington with all their guns when our other constitutional rights were being obliterated since 9-11? They are typical insecure wimps that use guns to make them feel big and I would never depend on them to defend me.

The lack of commonsense in the gun control debate is epidemic and will probably result in nothing more than a huge waste of time, money and some type of quick fix regulation designed to look like they've accomplished something that will make us all safer. I don't think that the majority of Americans are being realistic about the real issue: VIOLENCE in general, where guns play a very small part in violent crimes across this country. What about the number of rapes being committed in the armed forces? What about the pedophiles who abduct and murder children every day without the use of a gun? Maybe we should take a closer look at the corruption in our legal system that allows for plea bargaining and psychopaths to slip through the system. I live next door to a psychopath who tried to murder his wife and he plea bargained down to a misdemeanor AND since he moved in, he has bullied me, verbally attacked me and threatened me, thrown beer bottles at me and my dogs and my cars. Our legal system is as corrupt as our government.

People are willing to waste money sending teddy bears from Walmart to Newtown that will just sit there and rot in the rain and snow and somehow feel they have accomplished something that benefits the victims in some way. The president feels obligated to do something like the teddy bear givers but, like them, he doesn't address the real issue and provide real solutions. The real problem is cultural not mechanical. I would think that a panel of social scientists and should be advising him, not retailers and gun lobbyists.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (27764) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago
[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

“(…) the most common and least stigmatized weapons are among the most dangerous. Gun-control advocates seem perversely unaware of this. (…)”

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

"According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report, 47 percent of all murders in the U.S. are committed with handguns. Again, only 3 percent are committed with rifles (of any type). (...)"