Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: Any Active ARTICLE5 People Still Here?

Posted 6 years ago on April 17, 2012, 10:46 p.m. EST by CobyART5 (59)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Where did all the ArticleV people go?

A while back there were a few Article V people on the forum. It was difficult to get people on board, but now that we've seen the constitution on the butchers block, I think its time to revisit this method.

Anyone out there?????????



Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by forourfutures (393) 6 years ago

There are a few of us that know Article V still visiting. Great to see the inquiry rise though.

There was some support for Article V, but passive. On a board flooded with bots and infiltration like OWS, it takes more than passive support to float a boat.

I've visited here a few times in the last month, but the board seems dominated by the most pointless repetitions of problems with no suggestion of actual solution.

I have noticed that the Article V message board has been getting read quite bit so people are looking. That "Preparation for Article V" plan is awesome and I've been out trying to gain some understanding for the common sense aspect of it.


Some have said that there is a malware page warning with some browsers. Not real.

[-] 1 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 6 years ago

I still support it. You have to realize what happened here. Im up to my arms in fighting these pro Obama hacks that simply want us to vote for D and thats about it.

Take a look around. The whole place has gone to shit.

[-] 1 points by TrevorMnemonic (5827) 6 years ago

Indeed it has

[-] 1 points by forourfutures (393) 6 years ago

So when folks won't hang out any where else, what does that mean?

[-] -1 points by BLOWCHUNKS (43) 6 years ago

Sure, I support the entire constitution.

[-] 0 points by childseyes (85) 6 years ago

What could be more obvious than the law of the land?

It's completely in our favor but we never talk about in groups. It's almost foreign to some people.

Here it looks that way at times. The article v people made the most sense. I really like the part where congress and the pres haev no say. NO SAY OMG, only the peoples decisions.

Sometimes it appears that with all them that are not discussing article 5, that they are exercising something the wrong way, or out of sequence. Most big .orgs actually don't make sense. Like that 99% declaration.

I love the idea of 99%, but a declaration? Really. How weak. Where are those article v people?

Wasn't there a criminal complaint to Eric Holder, the AG, about congress?

[-] -1 points by BLOWCHUNKS (43) 6 years ago

I guess Ruth Bader Ginsburg is not in our favor then, because she said she didn't like our constitution.