Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Another Republican making AZ a laughing stock, here’s stuff Joe didn’t have time to look into.

Posted 2 years ago on March 2, 2012, 7:21 a.m. EST by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Sheriff Joe has plenty of time for birther craop, but if you’re a 12 year old hispanic girl who’s been abused, he’s just too busy.

“Vasquez and a male friend stood in the front yard, hugging a crying girl. The girl, who was 12 when she'd had sex with the older man, said she hadn't mentioned the encounter earlier because she was afraid of her mom's cousin. The suspect recently had moved to Tennessee to work, and the family was confident they'd be able to help track him down. The El Mirage officer recorded interviews with the family and impounded them into evidence. The routine at that time, because of the MCSO contract, was to turn over such a case to Arpaio's Special Victims Unit, also called the sex-crimes unit. You'd think such a case would be easily solved with a paternity test. But the case wasn't worked by Arpaio's officers and was returned to El Mirage after the town ended its contract with the MCSO in October 2007.” http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2012-02-16/news/joe-arpaio-s-office-says-to-hell-with-the-children/

No protection, but hey he makes up for it in persecution:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/12/16/sheriff-joe-arpaio-slammed-in-federal-civil-rights-probe-report.html

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2012/02/02/oldest-latino-civil-rights-group-demands-sheriff-joe-arpaios-resignation/

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/12/20/391961/civil-rights-violator-sheriff-joe-arpaio-whines-that-doj-violated-his-civil-rights-by-calling-him-names/?mobile=nc

Update it is now uncertain if Obama will be on the AZ ballot.

this just in it will be:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hhacFAfKugFRgqyd-OAq5dCgiQsg?docId=5a5a54f344364ea8bd624615d1221f1b

42 Comments

42 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

I cannot stand Arpaio. I want to see that guy in prison.

[-] 4 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

You know how hard it is to get consensus at a GA?

Getting rid of Sheriff Joe, was no problem, in Phoenix everybody agrees, look at the march we had, it's from OccupyPhoenix

[-] 3 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

I would still like to see that guy in prison.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Yeah in Mexico, maybe ha could "win" some tickets....

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

I hope that he does win those tickets. He is an abomination.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

One of the things I find interesting about him, is that he is so obliviously, a hateful and sick person, when you see him live or even on TV and yet he has frantic fans, I don't know why so many people love pure evil so much.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

I think a lot of that support comes from people that live outside of Maricopa County. It's all fun and games when you are dealing with someone else's cash flow. I don't think that they realize how much he costs the county and how little of his job that he does.

The only people at this point that support this guy inside of AZ have to be included into his "posse". They have to benefit in some way that they would not benefit from someone else. He has caused a great deal of harm to many people. If the guy was a sheriff in anyone else's state, he would probably have been ousted many years ago.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

This is true, some of the locals see him as a right wing cleb. so they like the attention, in some ways explains Meakum? and Symington? and you are right the New Times runs story after story about what he costs us, but his people don't believe and the local main paper is ran by his borther in law that's my understanding anyway. Maybe the feds will throw him in jail, but somehow I doubt it, his kind just get tthe county to bail them out.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

I can see how Maricopa County enjoys being the laughingstock of the country. I hope he gets nailed and winds up in jail.

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Yeah me too, we can hope,

[-] -3 points by Unwashed (-141) 2 years ago

But the illegals can stay. LOL.

[-] 4 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

This is a guy that misplaces money, didn't pay his employees at the jail for overtime, has kept his jail in disgusting conditions and denied pretrial detainees health care and wasted a lot of tax payer money on a sting with his "posse". Do you have any idea how much money that Maricopa County has had to pay in lawsuits because of this guy?

[-] -3 points by Unwashed (-141) 2 years ago

Sorry, you're in favor of cleaning up the illegals and enforcing our immigration laws. My mistake. LOL.

[-] 4 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

LOL, You fascist right wing hack.

[-] -1 points by Unwashed (-141) 2 years ago

Joe is bad because he might have done something illegal, but illegals are good and are, well, illegals. Gotcha. Gotta love the liberal "mind".

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

Let me see, Pima County actually encounters the brunt of illegal aliens and doesn't have any of the problems that Maricopa has. Gee, could it be that you are limited by your Fux Nus intake?

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8719) 2 years ago

Of course they can stay, the economic puppetmasters of the oligarchy want them to stay to drive down American wages. While they're at it they can get the thrill of abusing a lot of Mexicans. It satisfies their sadism two for one.

[-] 2 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Occupy Phoenix speaks about sheriff Joe Arpaio

.http://occupyphx.org/news/media/sheriff-joe-must-go/

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8719) 2 years ago

These peole are really gonners, they need to see a psychiatrist. And this guy's a sherrif . . . surprize.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

you should talk to these people here about Sheriff Joe, the craziest right wing ideas and they got their own Sheriff, thank god he's an incompetent publicity hound, thank you for stopping by :).

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

What no Joe supporters?

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 2 years ago

Obviously the bot runner does support sheriff Joe.

It must be a closet (R)epelican't.

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

oops this about a republican, oh what the hell it's still a good one

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 2 years ago

Well... the whole undercurrent of Hispanic South of the Border society is rife with such abuse; it's an unimpeachable patriarchal society.

(Can we even call it a "society" or do such words require some civility in the form of institutionalized behavioral controls?)

Old Joe didn't abuse her... so wtf?

[-] 1 points by TitusMoans (2451) from Boulder City, NV 2 years ago

What are you talking about?

You write what most people flush,

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 2 years ago

I'm talking about the continuous flow of Hispanic illegals through our prisons for alcohol induced sexual antics.

[-] 1 points by TitusMoans (2451) from Boulder City, NV 2 years ago

Flush.

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 2 years ago

We'd like to flush them, yes.

[-] 0 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

if you follow the thread I think he revels himself, people like that can't just come out and say what they believe, sad really, thanks for reading.

[-] 0 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

So as long as a cop didn't do it, no need to call the cops?

Don't think I agree.

[-] 1 points by betuadollar (-313) 2 years ago

You miss the point; sexual abuse of family members is a common occurrence in this largely patriarchal society. And unfortunately, if they are illegals, they are not entitled to the right of protection.

[-] 0 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

you're actually wrong about that last point, I mean under the law and all, but if you mean morally, then that frees them to do as they please as well, do you have any daughters?

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 2 years ago

As non-citizens, they are not Constitutionally entitled to rights of protection, only those which we choose to generously and humanely extend; they are, however, subject to our law.

Yes, I do have daughters... no, I am not dispassionate... yes, I do understand that the local Sheriff Dept often utilizes funds for the unintended means of its own political benefit. I think you will find an undercurrent of anti-alien sentiment here, for various reasons. And I'm not certain that's something we need apologize for.

[-] 1 points by timirninja (263) 2 years ago

i believe that slavery as form of human abuse has widely use long way before constitution was written. So immigrants can rely to constitution as a slaves.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8719) 2 years ago

This comment is unintelligable.

[-] 1 points by timirninja (263) 2 years ago

You know American history better. Could you tell me thing: Slaves were before the constitution. So if immigrants meets prosecution in court, i think, they can try to link to constitution. and be prosecuted as slaves in the state where their residence are. Or try to transfer the trial to the state where their belong according their documents

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

"Constitutionally" is that your way of saying your opinion differs from that of the Supreme Court?

If you don't give a man justice, you can't expect it.

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 2 years ago

Most definitely... the Constitution is very specific in reference to it's right of protection. Whether labeled as "guest" or "invader," the "rights" of illegals fall under the ancient Law of Nations and not the Constitution (or for that matter decisions of the Supreme Court).

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

I'll keep that in mind for your hearings. (for the Court)

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 2 years ago

I'm listening... but I'm not hearing anything. So hear I sit, broken-hearted...

[-] 1 points by factsrfun (5952) from Phoenix, AZ 2 years ago

Cheer up not everyone can sit on the Court.

[-] -3 points by randy99 (-4) 2 years ago

It's pretty easy to see why this partisan poster was included on their hit list:

http://occupywallst.org/forum/a-message-to-the-ows-forum-from-pseudoanonymous-re/