Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: Michel Chossudovsky ~ America's War for Global Domination

Posted 10 years ago on Sept. 20, 2012, 11:32 a.m. EST by Renneye (3874)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

[This article shows the deeper machinations of the globalists' use of war, and the degree to which we are manipulated by these murderers. If this does not infuriate...and get 'all' of us to rise up against our oligarch oppressors, I don't know what will. This article is even more appropriate now than when it was written in 2003...only 2 years after 9/11. Whether you believe the 9/11 conspiracy or not, is not 'necessarily' important to the overall content of the main message in the article. Pay closer attention, instead, to the M.O. and the sinister brutality used by the oligarch globalists, in their callous intent to perpetrate and bring to fruition their blueprint, and ultimate conquest...globalization.]

America's War for Global Domination

by Michel Chossudovsky

The following is the background text of Michel Chossudovsky's public lecture at the Society for the Defense of Civil Rights and Human Dignity (GBM), Berlin, 10-11 December, 2003 and Humboldt University, Berlin, 12 December 2003.

On Human Rights Day, 10 December 2003, Michel Chossudovsky was awarded The 2003 Human's Rights Prize of the Society for the Protection of Civil Rights and Human Dignity (GBM). [details deutsch ]


"We are the juncture of the most serious crisis in modern history.

The Bush Administration has embarked upon a military adventure which threatens the future of humanity."

"The Planning of War

The war on Iraq has been in the planning stages at least since the mid-1990s.

A 1995 National Security document of the Clinton administration stated quite clearly that the objective of the war is oil. "to protect the United States' uninterrupted, secure U.S. access to oil.

In September 2000, a few months before the accession of George W. Bush to the White House, the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) published its blueprint for global domination under the title: "Rebuilding America's Defenses."

The PNAC is a neo-conservative think tank linked to the Defense-Intelligence establishment, the Republican Party and the powerful Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which plays a behind-the-scenes role in the formulation of US foreign policy.

The PNAC's declared objective is quite simple - to:

"Fight and decisively win in multiple, simultaneous theater wars".

This statement indicates that the US plans to be involved simultaneously in several war theaters in different regions of the World.

Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney had commissioned the PNAC blueprint prior to the presidential elections.

The PNAC outlines a roadmap of conquest. It calls for "the direct imposition of U.S. "forward bases" throughout Central Asia and the Middle East "with a view to ensuring economic domination of the world, while strangling any potential "rival" or any viable alternative to America's vision of a 'free market' economy" (See Chris Floyd, Bush's Crusade for empire, Global Outlook, No. 6, 2003)

The Role of "Massive Casualty Producing Events"

The PNAC blueprint also outlines a consistent framework of war propaganda. One year before 9/11, the PNAC called for "some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor," which would serve to galvanize US public opinion in support of a war agenda. (See http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NAC304A.html )

The PNAC architects seem to have anticipated with cynical accuracy, the use of the September 11 attacks as "a war pretext incident."

The PNAC's reference to a "catastrophic and catalyzing event" echoes a similar statement by David Rockefeller to the United Nations Business Council in 1994:

"We are on the verge of global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

Similarly, in the words Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book, The Grand Chessboard:.

"…it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus [in America] on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat."

Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was National Security Adviser to President Jimmy Carter was one of the key architects of the Al Qaeda network, created by the CIA at the onslaught of the Soviet Afghan war (1979-1989).

The "catastrophic and catalyzing event" as stated by the PNAC is an integral part of US military-intelligence planning. General Franks, who led the military campaign into Iraq, pointed recently (October 2003) to the role of a "massive casualty-producing event" to muster support for the imposition of military rule in America. (See General Tommy Franks calls for Repeal of US Constitution, November 2003, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/EDW311A.html ).

Franks identifies the precise scenario whereby military rule will be established:

"a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event [will occur] somewhere in the Western world - it may be in the United States of America - that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event." (Ibid)

This statement from an individual, who was actively involved in military and intelligence planning at the highest levels, suggests that the "militarisation of our country" is an ongoing operational assumption. It is part of the broader "Washington consensus". It identifies the Bush administration's "roadmap" of war and "Homeland Defense." Needless to say, it is also an integral part of the neoliberal agenda.

The "terrorist massive casualty-producing event" is presented by General Franks as a crucial political turning point. The resulting crisis and social turmoil are intended to facilitate a major shift in US political, social and institutional structures.

General Franks' statement reflects a consensus within the US Military as to how events ought to unfold. The "war on terrorism" is to provide a justification for repealing the Rule of Law, ultimately with a view to "preserving civil liberties."

Franks' interview suggests that an Al Qaeda sponsored terrorist attack will be used as a "trigger mechanism" for a military coup d'état in America. The PNAC's "Pearl Harbor type event" would be used as a justification for declaring a State of emergency, leading to the establishment of a military government.

In many regards, the militarisation of civilian State institutions in the US is already functional under the facade of a bogus democracy.

War Propaganda....."

Full and increasingly interesting article here...




Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by Renneye (3874) 10 years ago

Another excerpt from link in main post;

"Actual Terrorist Attacks

In other words, to be "effective" the fear and disinformation campaign cannot solely rely on unsubstantiated "warnings" of future attacks, it also requires "real" terrorist occurrences or "incidents", which provide credibility to the Washington's war plans. These terrorist events are used to justify the implementation of "emergency measures" as well as "retaliatory military actions". They are required, in the present context, to create the illusion of "an outside enemy" that is threatening the American Homeland.

The triggering of "war pretext incidents" is part of the Pentagon's assumptions. In fact it is an integral part of US military history.(See Richard Sanders, War Pretext Incidents, How to Start a War, Global Outlook, published in two parts, Issues 2 and 3, 2002-2003).

In 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff had envisaged a secret plan entitled "Operation Northwoods", to deliberately trigger civilian casualties to justify the invasion of Cuba:

"We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," "We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington" "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." (See the declassified Top Secret 1962 document titled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba"16 (See Operation Northwoods at http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NOR111A.html ).

main link; http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO312A.html

[-] 3 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 10 years ago

Gosh, is he suggesting we have a military government running a fake democracy, just like Israel?

[-] 3 points by Nevada1 (5843) 10 years ago

Good Post

[-] 2 points by DSamms (-294) 9 years ago

More folks ought read this...

[-] 1 points by Renneye (3874) 9 years ago

"Operation Gladio" may also be something you would find interesting.



It is a wish of mine that one day, humanity will be told the truth of our history...because the fiction we are fed through our school history books are so far from the truth, as to be fiction.

Thanks kindly, for bringing this thread to the forefront!

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Operation Gladio - one in a series of shock doctrine operations - Right?

Folks at home reference global economic meltdown - see also conflicts : middle east, Africa

[-] 2 points by Renneye (3874) 9 years ago

Exactly...Indoctrination into fear. How else would 'they' control us?

Myself, I think humanity would be harmonious and accepting of each other if left alone by the manipulators. Clearly all of these supposed 'divisions' between us aren't there naturally if global governments have to conjure up reasons for us to be frightened of each other with staged wars and terrorism. I'm beginning to think that very little of history's violence was ever organic. War crimes a-plenty.

Time for a change of consciousness...

Playing For Change: United ~ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vT_7AX06UQ

[-] -1 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

"Exactly...Indoctrination into fear. How else would 'they' control us?"

Fear is an old method. The NWO use modern microchips capable of controlling behavior with great precision. I highly recommend each citizen to check the back of their necks via X-ray. 20% of the population has already been microchipped. Occupy should set up free X-ray booths in downtown areas so that everyone can get help.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 9 years ago

I like the way you put 'they' in quotes, accidently revealing which side you are really on.

What's the matter, are they running out of high school graduates?

[-] 0 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

I quoted Renneye. She put they in quotes, not me. Did you graduate high-school? You seem to have basic reading comprehension problems. Learn to identify quotes. They are usually delimited by quotation marks just like I did.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 9 years ago

Oh really?

[-] -2 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

Yes. I quoted her comment just above. http://occupywallst.org/forum/americas-war-for-global-domination-michel-chossudo/#comment-920643

If you have a beef with using quotation marks around they you should reply to her comment instead.

I never modify quotes, just copy/paste. That's how one should quote no?

Perhaps you need a new pair of glasses? If you can't follow a thread properly, don't bother intervening.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 9 years ago

Take the old fear spreading shit you guys do here and put it where the sun don't shine. I don't even bother to read it anymore. Shit, there's been reams of it here, and guess what, we're not quaking in our boots yet, sorry.

You have learned to read apparently, but to what end?

[-] 0 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

Renneye was talking about fear, I was saying the NWO does not use that method any longer. You should be replying to her not me. She's the one talking about fear and using quotes around 'they'.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 9 years ago

You were being sarcastic? Sorry, I've seen so much of that shit here written seriously that I've come to take it at face value.

[-] -1 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

When's the last time you X-rayed your neck?

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 9 years ago

The last time I had my testicles examined for trilobites.

[-] -1 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

The NWO never put chips in testicles since they can easily be damaged during reproduction rites. The back of the neck is the chosen spot because it is formed of rigid cartilage, provides easy access for installation and upgrades, and is closer to the brain for quicker response times. I'm currently working on public X-ray booths which will provide an easy way for each citizen to check their microchip status.

[-] 1 points by Builder (4202) 9 years ago


[-] 0 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

Indeed, the chips use Vector Quantization as the core processing architecture. Did you also spend time in the NWO technical labs? Are you the user from Australia who used to go by the name of ReBuilder in our secret lab forums? Fancy meeting you here! You also defected?

For our readers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_quantization

[-] 1 points by Builder (4202) 9 years ago

Yep, you're him alright.

[-] 0 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

Who do you think I am? Can you identify yourself using the secret code word for Operation Casper? I'm assuming you were working for the team back then if you knew the chips used Vector Quantization.

[-] 1 points by Middleaged (5140) 9 years ago

I think I have a big ego. I thought this was a good point for legal minds to drive a change in TBTF banks on Wall Street. But it is just ego that drive me... Tkae a look:


[-] 0 points by oldJim (-96) 9 years ago

The NWO is scared of Occupy. Their plans and agendas might be revealed by people who care about the truth and who are tired of being manipulated. For this reason, they have started infiltrating the Occupy ranks. Last week, my sources from the Chinese faction of NWO revealed that three top occupiers were NWO spies. We must be more careful.

[-] -1 points by RothchildThe3rd (-47) 10 years ago

These New World Order conspiracies never stop do they?