Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: America has no free press - by former Intelligence officer Gordon Duff

Posted 1 year ago on Feb. 15, 2013, 9:43 a.m. EST by gmxusa (270)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

“A week ago, Press TV aired a documentary film featuring former US National Security Advisor on Middle Eastern Affairs, Gwyneth Todd. Todd, an official during both the Clinton and Bush administrations, told audiences of quashed espionage investigations and Bush administration complicity in planning assassinations and terror attacks against US officials and military in order to blame Iran and justify a broadened war.”

This week, the US government, as part of unilateral sanctions against Iran, censored Press TV, removing it from satellite broadcast across all of North America. The reason they gave is insane. They claim to have silenced Press TV, an Iranian based broadcast service, in order to “prevent censorship.”

Todd is supported by, not only documentation, but by dozens of top counter-intelligence officials from the FBI, Pentagon and intelligence agencies who were silenced to keep this horrific story from the public. Only weeks before, Jeff Stein of the Washington Post, tried to break this story into the US media. His powerful and well-written account, confirming Todd’s allegations “died on the vine,” with a total “blackout” by all other US media outlets.

If that’s not censorship, what is?

Between the Press TV documentary and the Washington Post article, accusations of terrorism, espionage and treason could and should be made against dozens of former Bush and Pentagon officials.

These aren’t just allegations, they include a detailed narrative of suppressed investigations, of witness intimidation, of terrorism and murder.

“Watergate” was a joke in comparison and yet nothing is done, nothing reported, nothing but the censorship of Press TV and the suppression of any follow-up.

No attempt has been made to label this story as “conspiracy theory” as the facts are inexorable and overwhelming.

Instead, silencing Press TV is the answer.

Another key area of Press TV reporting has involved the nomination of former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel to take over as Secretary of Defense.

During the entire hearings, one GOP senator after another did everything possible to assail and humiliate Hagel, a decorated hero, a combat infantryman during the Vietnam War, the first real soldier to ever be nominated to head America’s military.

Every question involved “Israel,” over 100 carefully crafted insults and accusations, all obviously prepared in advance, all carefully coordinated with attack advertisements funded by gambling, prostitution and narcotics money, something openly admitted and easily documented. Each question from senators clearly in the employ of the powerful Israel lobby that Hagel has criticized demanded that he admit such a lobby has never existed.

Not only have the American people reeled in the absurdity, celebrities such as Bill Maher, have finally come out as vocal critics of Israeli extremism. A year before, Maher had been the voice of the Israel lobby.

Lynching Hagel

The American military has been praying for a DOD Secretary like Hagel for many years, almost too many to count. To them, Hagel “gets it,” understands the difference between serving America and serving the powerful, supporting endless war and endless waste, the nature of “revolving door” profiteering that has done so much to destroy America. It isn’t Hagel that shamed the Republicans in the senate. They shamed themselves and America and the world saw it. It was Press TV that did the most to report it, fairly and accurately. They shamed it more when they walked out today, leaving America with no Secretary of Defense, not until a gutless shill acceptable to Abe Foxman and Netanyahu can be found, and perhaps, cleaned up.

For that, they have to be shut down.

Speaking of propaganda, this last week I heard Terry Gross of National Public Radio interview a guest about Iran’s nuclear program.

Gross “hand fed” questions crafted to elicit lies and misinform the audience. When her guest, one of so many “nuclear experts” who never worked with nuclear weapons at any time, who don’t have the remotest idea how they work or how uranium is actually enriched, parroted typical accusations against Iran, Gross simply “lapped it up.”

She, of course, is aware that America’s National Intelligence Estimates have long proven Iran has no nuclear program. She is aware she is pushing for an unjust war.

She is aware, quite aware, she is both corrupt and dishonest. Let’s be honest, the word that describes this kind of propaganda and war mongering is “evil.”

NPR (National Public Radio), once somewhat independent though government funded, has chosen to systematically lie, propagandize and dissemble.

No one is silencing them.

For decades, Fox News has spewed conspiracy theory, bigotry, propaganda and hate to the American people. In Britain, their parent company, NewsCorp, has been cited for espionage, wiretapping, blackmail and bribery. Dozens of their top management are facing years in prison.

In the US, however, they are the voice of the Republican Party. It’s not that they don’t continually engage in blatant propaganda, war mongering, wild conspiracy theory and worse. It isn’t as though they don’t engage in espionage, bribery, treason and extortion in the US. They do. They are above the law, defended by the Israel lobby, defended by war profiteers, defended by, to be brutally honest, organized crime.

There is no worse news organization in the world than Fox/NewsCorp. Yet, there is no move, even in Britain, to silence them. They buy and sell politicians around the world, always have.

Why silence Press TV?

Let’s take a second to look at the “Palestinian issue.” Recently, the United Nations voted overwhelmingly to recognize Gaza, East Jerusalem and the West Bank as a sovereign Palestinian nation. Yet, every day we hear about Israeli military operations inside what we are told is NOT Israel, bulldozing homes, shooting “militant demonstrators” and seizing land.

But wait, didn’t the UN vote mean that Israel couldn’t do that? Actually, the Geneva Convention of 1948 clearly states that attempts to move “settlers” onto occupied land, conquered during war is a “crime against humanity” and punishable under tribunals such as those used against the Nazis at Nuremberg.

Funny thing, no American newspaper or network ever manages to put these pieces together. What could represent purer censorship and propaganda than this?

Funny thing, we haven’t even begun.

Our news tells us that Iran has to be attacked to keep them from getting nuclear weapons that our intelligence services assure us they are not making. Propaganda?

Doesn’t Israel have nuclear weapons? Ever hear a news story that describes how they got them? Uranium and plutonium was stolen from the US, pure “weapons grade” and shipped to Israel, tons of it. Ever hear or read stories that describe Israel’s nuclear arsenal as “illegal?” It is.

This is censorship and propaganda at its purest. The US accuses Press TV of propagandizing the Iranian people yet American actions are clearly aimed at censoring Press TV in the United States. Does the absurdity of this escape everyone? No “pop culture” media organization has managed to recognize the obvious insanity of US actions.

Nearly every constitutional right, including the most basic, habeas corpus, has been suspended in the US and remains so. The Bill of Rights, the foundation of all American freedoms, has been legislated away over the past twelve years and virtually nothing is being said about it, nothing but the self-serving blithering of the gun lobby.

America has no free press and what was once seen as a free “blogosphere” on the internet is now a sewer of “controlled opposition” and “game theory warfare,” carefully crafted censorship and propaganda. The tools used, payoffs, smears, infiltration, hacking, threats and even murder, this is how those who have fought for truth on the internet have been dealt with.

Few survive today, very few. Many say the internet is entirely controlled, censored and staged. Are they right? America was “hijacked” well before 9/11.

As for Israel, their “opposition” is the newspaper, Haaretz.” Every other media outlet is obviously government controlled. Take a look at the editorial board of the Times of Israel.

As for Haaretz, they are the purest form of controlled opposition. They make tiny noises that almost sound like independence but, upon careful reading, are all “sizzle” and no “steak.”

By my estimation, they are the real voice of the Mossad. As for Israel’s government, the ultra-nationalist Likudists under Netanyahu have managed to control Israel through flooding the country with Russians, all “right wing extremists,” many with no Jewish background at all.

Israel has a vibrant political system, if you accept the fact that the majority of residents are excluded on the basis of “race” or religion. A recent study at Johns Hopkins of “racial origins” points out that the vast majority of Palestinians are Semites while fewer than 10% of Jewish Israeli’s have any “Semitic DNA” present.”

Does this make the Likudists “anti-Semites?”

Can a state that engages in apartheid and ethnic cleansing be democratic? Based on UN votes on thirty two recent resolutions, the only “denial” of this aspect of Israeli society is evidence in press censorship in Israel, Europe and the West.

The only reason for any censorship is to control a population by eliminating access to dangerous ideas. Dangerous ideas are considered dangerous because they have the power of truth behind them.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/02/14/us-israel-wage-war-against-press-tv/

47 Comments

47 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

After making controversial posts at Youtube for a while, one day, I suddenly found myself unable to make further posts. I wondered to a friend by email, whether I had been banned from it by the powers that be. Funny, but the day after I made this remark, I was able to make posts to Youtube once again.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

One obvious hypothesis is that your email was being read. It could also be simple coincidence. Censorship can be directed at the wrong people but those who can squeal need to be treated discreetly.

Beware of the long-term consequences of nuclear wastes: Nuclear Tank Leaking Radioactive Waste.

[-] 1 points by gmxusa (270) 1 year ago

Another hypothesis is that Arturo was temporarily shut by censors in China.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

It is possible.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

Actually, I use Express VPN, a web service that allows my to bypass the Chinese censors. Lots of foreigners use it here. I couldn't even get on to Youtube without it.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

Youtube is a "weapon of mass destruction" in Chinese censors' eyes but they are by no means the only ones.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

Youtube is banned, mostly because of the Tibet issue. There was some video showing police beating Tibetan protestors, and the Chinese claim that it was actually in Nepal. This is just approximately what I remember about it. Before that happened, Youtube was not blocked, and many Chinese people liked it.

I think some good information gets out by Youtube, but being owned by Google you have to assume that its used by the CIA.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

It is much harder (than prints or broadcasts) to have any deniability when actions are caught and uploaded to Youtube. Videos are harder to discredit because they have much more information and they can be corroborated by using other forms of media.

Youtube is a free-for-all so I am not surprised at all if it is used by the CIA, nor will I be surprised if it is used by China's PLA or any other group dealing with "public diplomacy," propaganda, or "online education."

[-] 1 points by gmxusa (270) 1 year ago

It seems to me that the Chinese censorship is a waste of resources and makes no difference.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

The U.S. effort to listen to all chatter may not be much better. It is actually a full-employment stimulus program. We can find out very quickly after terrorist attacks that yep, we had surely collected relevant intelligence data on them before they happened but nope, we did not prevent them. We can only prevent the ones that we had manufactured and staged ourselves.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

I don't know. Consider that much of our western culture has been subverted by the mass media. I think Chinese censorship is partly directed towards preventing that from happening here via the internet.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

Our western culture mass media have become rather irrelevant due to the fragmentation of interests. Internet media allow one to see, hear, and feel much of humanity in raw state. All states view that with wary eyes and the not-so-stable ones may even resort to censorship.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

I think a lot of western media is worse than irrelevant, its downright harmful. Who knows how many millions of people have been wiped out due to the media's misuse in war mongering, for example.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

There were "voices in the wilderness" that could be "heard" by most people intent on corroborating the schnitzel not doled out by the western mainstream media. War mongering may be rendered unsuccessful if people simply apply filters.

For example, why should we have believed in the Bush'ite administration's case for "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq instead of the U.N. personnel in charge of enforcing the sanctions in Iraq to prevent Iraq from having "weapons of mass destruction?" The U.N. was there for many years searching for them specifically (boots on the ground should be given more credibility than authority's "faith.")

Also the rocket tubes purportedly used by Saddam Hussein for enriching uranium in centrifuges was reported as having been made of aluminum. Any material scientist could have questioned that because aluminum is not a strong metal but it is light (good for rockets). More recently, Iran's centrifuges supposedly shaken to destruction as commanded by Stuxnet showed that the structural strength of the centrifuge tubes was absolutely required so aluminum could not have even come close to fitting the bill.

[-] 1 points by gmxusa (270) 1 year ago

In case you missed, here is Susan Lindauer, former CIA asset, on Iraq and 911. You can skip the first 7 min.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G43zl4fzDQg&feature=share&list=FLRpZrY2XGRQaOYa96r_h6zA

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

People do need to delve into more raw data and think for themselves rather than only swallowing the regurgitated news remains from the mainstream media.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

Whether it is a coincidence, or your hypothesis is correct, I guess I'll never know.

It is important to be aware of the long-term consequences of nuclear waste. But I think we should be moved by our concern to solve this kind of problem, rather than to abandon nuclear technology.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

You can actually try to work out the potential consequences of my hypothesis and then trigger the political seismometer with an artificial magnitude 3.0 earthquake. By monitoring the chatter, you can determine the probability that your email is being read.

The method is no different from how geophysicists study the interior of the Earth or how petroleum engineers look for prospective oil and gas drilling sites.

[-] 1 points by mideast (506) 1 year ago

America has no free press
silencing Press TV is the answer
America has no free press and what was once seen as a free “blogosphere” on the internet is now a sewer of “controlled opposition” and “game theory warfare,” carefully crafted censorship and propaganda"

Press TV is still available so many lies - so little time!


I think numbers are a much clearer way to get to truth:


How many "residents" of the United States - who are not citizens can legally vote?

Adding all of the 22 Arab / Muslim countries together, how many Jews are in their parliaments ?
Adding all of the 1 Jewish countries together, how many Arabs are in their parliaments ?
Adding all of the 700,000,000 people in Arab / Muslim countries together, how many Jews can vote in these countries ?
Adding all of the 8,000,000 people in Jewish countries together, how many Arabs can vote in these countries ?
In the last 60 years, how many Arabs / Muslims have been killed in conflicts with Israel?
In the last 60 years, how many Arabs / Muslims have been killed in conflicts with Arabs/Muslims?

[-] 1 points by LeoYo (4792) 1 year ago

Sniper Posts Pic of Child in Crosshairs

By Alexander Marquardt | ABC News – Mon, Feb 18, 2013

http://news.yahoo.com/israeli-sniper-posts-photo-child-crosshairs-163924256--abc-news-topstories.html

JERUSALEM - A photo posted online by an Israeli soldier showing a child in the crosshairs of a rifle scope has created a firestorm on the internet, drawing widespread criticism.

The photo was reportedly posted on Jan. 25 by Mor Ostrovski, 20, a member of an Israeli sniper unit. It shows crosshairs zeroed in on the back of the head of what appears to be a Palestinian boy in a village. The photo has since been taken down and Ostrovski's account has been deactivated.

"There are no other images to suggest that the photographer actually fired at the person in the image in this case," wrote Palestinian activist Ali Abuminah who runs the site Electronic Intifada and drew much of the attention to the photo. "The image is simply tasteless and dehumanizing. It embodies the idea that Palestinian children are targets."

Before the account was taken down, Abuminah posted other photos from Ostrovski's account that showed him in his olive green uniform holding a variety of weapons, including a sniper rifle.

Eytan Buchman, a spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces, told ABC News that Ostrovski told his commander on Saturday that he had not taken the photo himself but that he'd taken it off the internet. No disciplinary action will be taken.

"The picture in question does not coincide with IDF's values or code of ethics," the spokesman added in an e-mailed statement.

The uproar over the photo follows another posted by an Israeli infantryman on Facebook around a week ago. In it, he mocked the four Palestinian prisoners he was guarding by posing bound and blindfolded next to them. He was sentenced to 14 days detention after the brigade's commanders discovered the photo and ordered it taken down.

"Before the investigation began, it was discovered that the soldier was already judged by his commanders," Buchman said in a statement. "Since the documented offense isn't criminal and since the legal procedure conducted by the soldier's commanding officer was found appropriate, a disciplinary action was decided to be sufficient."

The IDF is active on social networking, disseminating statements on Twitter and Facebook and photos on Flickr and Instagram. But individual soldiers using social media have a history of getting the Israeli military into trouble.

In November, the head of the IDF spokesperson's social media unit landed in hot water after he posted a photo on Facebook with mud on his face, captioned "Obama style." In 2010, a reservist named Eden Abergil sparked outrage after posting pictures with blindfolded Palestinian prisoners. She told Israeli Army radio she didn't understood what she did wrong, but the IDF called the photos "shameful behavior."

[-] 1 points by LeoYo (4792) 1 year ago

Israel has a vibrant political system, if you accept the fact that the majority of residents are excluded on the basis of “race” or religion. A recent study at Johns Hopkins of “racial origins” points out that the vast majority of Palestinians are Semites while fewer than 10% of Jewish Israeli’s have any “Semitic DNA” present.”

Does this make the Likudists “anti-Semites?”

Yes, it does, along with anyone else who support actions against any people for either being Arab or Muslim. Arabs are Semites and Islam is a Semitic religion while even the non-priestly ruling populations of ancient Yisrael and Yehudah had been of a predominately non-Semitic patrilineal Hurrian descent which is why the Y-chromosome of so many Jewish men is closely related to that of the Kurdish population and biblical mythology portrays the mythical Yisraeli tribal ancestors as having come out of a northern homeland and become intermarried with indigenous women.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

I haven't been censored on the internet

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

I have not been censored, either. After all, I am a citizen of New Israel living in the New Jerusalem and I have rights from up on high. China's People's Liberation Army must have been behind the weird things going on with my computer to suppress my free press (and I am "grapes").

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

I asked a dude from the PLA, and he said it wasn't them.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

It may be true but he may not know things beyond his sphere of knowledge and authority. For all I know is that even you (due to your location) or our own intelligence agencies might have been implicated.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

Very interesting points, but to be quite honest, I was only making a joke.

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

There are software tools for locating the physical location of the origination server (yes, southern China was a source) but linking that to a specific individual or an organization is harder and takes time. Circumstantial evidences can nonetheless help.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

the Chinese giant doesn't want to wake up

[-] 1 points by gmxusa (270) 1 year ago

I don't want to be around when it wakes up.

Professor John Mearsheimer explains why. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXov7MkgPB4

[-] 1 points by grapes (2601) 1 year ago

It woke up but the limbs twitched by their own wills.

[-] 0 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

But are you a paid poster?

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

not yet

[-] 0 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

That's true, you wouldn't be looking for a job if you were getting paid, right?

. . . unless it's all part of a ruse. Yeah, . . . everything's falling right in place . . . (one can never be paranoid enough, I say).

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

people with jobs fear losing their jobs if they post about their jobs

[-] 1 points by shooz (26670) 1 year ago

Can you say, thank you President Reagan?

For getting that profit ball rolling.

Who needs a doctrine of fairness?

It might affect profits. Now on with the show.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 1 year ago

press tv??? ha ha ha ha wow dude that shit is straight up anti western propaganda. i am a radical. it is on my youtube subscriptions. it is complete propaganda. it's not news. not saying censoring it is good, fuck no it's not. it's fascist as all hell to censor it however all this being said it is straight up propaganda i watch it for laughs and to know what others are being told. so who is worse the propagandist or the censor they both fucking suck.

[-] -3 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

And what do you call the lying shitstains of NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, TimeWarner's NY1?

New York City treats them all like government info outlets. They were all given 4 hour heads up on Occupy's eviction from Zuccotti. And they said nothing.

That Canadian shitstain, Pat Kiernan of TimeWarner's NY1, sat there reading other news that morning, as though nothing was going on downtown. The eviction was covered for hours simply by the scroll at the bottom of the screen.

Shameful. I guess they can't be arrested for impersonating journalists, but could they be sued?

[-] 0 points by quantumystic (1710) from Memphis, TN 1 year ago

I never said those corporate fascist whores were any better. Just realize that presstv is Iranian government sponsored news ie. propaganda. The key is to find a few journalists you trust and ride them till the wheels fall off. Otherwise you are going to be spoon fed a constant stream of contradicting information from sources that all have their own agenda of domination and control.

[-] -3 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

I'd go even further, I suggest trusting verifiable facts only, not individuals. Follow commentators with good records if one wishes, but insist on the facts as presented being verifiable from multiple directions.

[-] 0 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

"Iosbaker told Press TV, “In order for there to be an anti-war movement, there has to be alternative sources of information. And they’re afraid of the anti-war movement because even in just the recent history, the anti-war movement has had consequences for the rulers here.”" http://www.fightbacknews.org/2013/1/5/ndaa-bans-iran-s-press-tv-us-airwaves

How true.

[-] 0 points by OTP (-203) from Tampa, FL 1 year ago

hmmmm

[-] -1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

Press TV banned in the U.S. -- the Land-of-the-Free-and-the-Home-of-the-Brave. http://www.fightbacknews.org/2013/1/5/ndaa-bans-iran-s-press-tv-us-airwaves

Sad.

Many more comments here: http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/ndaa-bans-irans-press-tv-from-u-s-airwaves/30269/

[-] 1 points by childseyes (85) 1 year ago

A VISITOR FROM THE PAST.

By; Thelan Paulk 1980?

I had a dream the other night, I didn't understand.

A figure walking through the mist, with flintlock in his hand.

His clothes were torn and dirty, as he stood there by the bed. He took off his three cornered hat, speaking low he said:

"We fought a revolution, to secure our liberty.

We wrote the constitution as a shield from tyranny.

For future generations, this legacy we gave.

In this, the land of the free and the home of the brave."

"The freedom we secured for you we hoped you would always keep.

But tyrants labored endlessly while your parents were asleep.

Your freedom gone, your courage lost, you're no more than a slave.

In this, the land of the free and the home of the brave."

"You buy permits to travel, and permits to own a gun,

permits to start a business, or to build a place for one.

On a land that you believe you own you pay a yearly rent.

While you have no voice in choosing how the money is spent."

"Your children must attend a school that doesn't educate.

Your Christian values can't be taught according to the state.

You read about the current news, in a regulated press.

You pay a tax you do not owe to please the IRS."

"Your money is no longer made of silver or of gold.

You traded in your wealth for paper so your life can be controlled.

You pay for crimes that make our Nation turn from God in shame.

You've taken Satans number as you've traded in your name."

"You've given government control to those who do you harm,

so they can padlock churches and steal the family farm,

and keep our country deep in debt, put men of God in jail,

harass your fellow countrymen, while corrupted courts prevail."

"your public servants don't uphold the solemn oath they've sworn.

Your daughters visit doctors so their children won't be born.

Your leaders ship artillery and guns to foreign shores,

and send your sons to slaughter fighting other peoples wars."

"Can you regain the freedom for which we fought and died?

Or don't you have the courage to stand with faith and pride?

Are there no more values for which you'll fight to save?

Or do you wish your children live in fear and be a slave?"

"Sons of the republic, arise and take a stand!

Defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land!

Preserve our Great Republic and each God Given Right!

and pray to God, to keep the torch of freedom burning bright!"

As I awoke he vanished, in the mist from which he came.

His words were true, we are not free, we have ourselves to blame.

For even now as tyrants trample each God Given Right.

We only watch and tremble, too afraid to stand and fight."

If he stood by your bedside in a dream, while you were asleep.

and wonders what remains of our Rights he fought to keep.

What we be your answer if he called out from the grave?

"IS THIS STILL THE LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE?"

[-] -1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

1980? Incredible.

"Is this still the land of the free and the home of the brave?" Only if we, the people, take back our government.

[-] 1 points by childseyes (85) 1 year ago

We must enforce our constitution through ART5. Abolish the abusive infiltration of our government and alter its action/function with amendment.

[-] -2 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

If we had a free press they'd be all over the Sandy Hook false flag, it gets more ridiculous everyday.

"No one connected to the Sandy Hook shootings testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on gun violence today. I'm thinking, that's because, when you testify before Congress, you have to take an oath. Just by giving their names, the Sandy Hook actors would have committed perjury. --LRP" http://www.legitgov.org/Sandy-Hook-Shooting-Oddities

Production team images here: http://www.legitgov.org/graphics/sandy_hook_false_flag.jpg , http://www.legitgov.org/graphics/sandy_hook_false_flag2.jpg