Forum Post: America Has just attacked another country
Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 27, 2011, 2:09 a.m. EST by sinthytechstudios
(22)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
The United states just attacked Pakistan for no reason, Pakistan was our ally in Afghanistan. They were letting NATO pass through their country and even allowed NATO to have a base. We are one scizzo partner, how does any nation trust the U.S.
war is business. keep attacking so stock market can rise
war is attempt at control. keep attacking to take away their freedom to live
Yeah! Warbama 2012!
You make it sound like this is something new. We have been doing this for years. The US has had over 280 drone attacks in Pakistan since 2004.
We are using drones and cruise missiles in Yemen, Somalia, LIbya,
We dropped over $500 million worth of US missiles on Libya.
And by the way, While other countries are pat of NATO, the forces are basically controlled by the US.
The U.S. has a say in what goes on but we are under the command of NATO. Or did I get that wrong?
Well that is not what I was talking about. I was talking about missiles launched from US ships paid for by US citizens.
Also, for all intensive purposes, NATO in a sense reports to the US. The Supreme Allied Commander Europe is one of the two strategic commanders for NATO and the commanding officer of Allied Command Operations (ACO). The current SACEUR is Admiral James Stavridis. He is responsible to NATO's Military Committee, the highest military authority in NATO, for the overall direction and conduct of military operations for NATO.
SACEUR, a United States Flag or General officer, leads all NATO military operations and is dual-hatted as Commander US European Command
That's why America is losing all its allies and its economy is ruining. It's not a foreign policy and in a little time will be isolated from the world.
When you exit America, you'll realize you already are isolated from the world.
I don't understand you. I'm not speaking about people, but the States. Pakistan is now allied to China. The supplies to the soldiers aren't going to reach them anymore, so they will be compelled to leave Afghanistan, where the EuroAsiatic Union will build a nuclear missilisic system. If the US soldiers hadn't killed without a reason a lot of Pakistan people, now USA would have two more allies. Thrasymaque, before leaving a comment, ask for informations.
US should close its military bases all around the world and ask its soldiers to come home.
Perhaps I had misunderstood you. I agree perfectly with you and this is the opinion of the 99% of people in the world. So we've to throw away the governors in every Country, before they reduce the planet to a quagmire. Wherever people are more intelligent than their leaders.
Quagmire is an elegant work I had not read in a long time. Thank you for reminding me of its existence.
If we take over US first, we'll have access to their military toys. We can then use these to throw away the governors of every other country. A coup of coups. I don't think it will work though. It seems to far fetch an idea. How do you suggest we do this? How can we possibly throw out all the governors of the world?
There no problem, Thrasymaque, and we don't need new ideas. The violente throwing out of all the governors of the world is just a question of time. There are thousands of insurgents all over the world ready to take the place of the corrupted men who qualify themselves politicians. I read these news every day on the newspapers on line of the western and estearn nations. The world is deeply changed, but the politicians haven't realized that yet.
Then why are we here? If there's no problem and nobody needs new ideas, we should be having a party! Where do you live? Do you want me to throw a barbecue on the beach? I'm in Bali. Come over, let's have a party the world will never forget. Invite the occupiers in your city as well. They don't need to camp anymore, everything is dandy. Bring some girls! It's party time!
It's not a question to have a party. The fact is that the world's never changed as in this period of history. If the politicians will realize that or not is the same thying. Are the men who follow the facts and not the facts that follow the men.
Truth must be - simple and easy! And just as beautiful! As autumn!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usGGX6ZqQv0
It's about time.
you know what they say . . .
friendly fire isn't
and it doesn't matter which side of the hill it comes from.
America has become a self destructive nation not only to its people but to the rest of the world.
US is giving billions to those diaper heads and they need to be cut off. We have no say, what the Gov does with our money at all
How about a bit of accuracy from us?
From an AP feed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — NATO and Pakistani forces may have attacked one another in a tragic case of mistaken identity — each thinking the other side was Taliban, according to the first battlefield accounts after the worst incident of fratricide since the Afghan war began.
First paragraph.
You aren't informed, Pandorak. NATO and Pakistan aren't longer friends. Pakistan has become a friend of China now. Americans know the reality less than Italians.
I replied with the first paragraph of the article not opinion.
I know full well what the situation is between NATO and Pakistan but fear mongering is not conductive to anything but fear.
Way to understanding
Pakistan has nuclear weapons.
Canada has nukes too, they just aren't "Canadian", they are British or American, but on Canadian soil and most likely armed and pointed.
Canada is reliable country. I am here troubling - the prospects of North Korea.
The questions are. A. Do nukes even work? The true nuclear missile has never been tested, only the atomic bomb. B. Who will be willing use a nuke? North Korea doesn't have long range nuclear missiles, only short range at best; which would have a negative impact on their environment.
This is - yes. But today, the danger even not from of war. In case of accidental explosion, the planet may break into pieces.
Good point. Fukushima. http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2011/03/16/pickering-nuclear-leak.html
You have to question the storage security and safety of their handling. I never thought that a nuclear accident would be a bigger disaster than a nuclear attack.
Very good point.
Thanks! I hope, God - saves Earth!
The planet could not break into pieces from an accidental explosion. It would be horrible for the atmosphere and the radiation and it would make a big whole, but the planet would remain in one piece. Earth as already been hit with huge asteroids that are equal or more powerful than atomic bombs. Jupiter got hit in its passed by mega huge asteroids and is still in one piece. You would need an amazing force to break up the Earth.
Suppose. But, the United States are not will be more! You will feel better from this?
Nuclear accidents are always dangerous and of course very harmful. Are you from the Chernobyl generation? My point was simply that the planet would not break into pieces. Of course, the damage would be horrendous.
I, too far from the United States. But the planet, we have one with you. We need to take care of Earth!
I agree. Nuclear weapons should all be dismantled. Are you in Russia? Where?
Penza. Povolje. 800 km from Moscow to South-East. Let's save the World! Together!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usGGX6ZqQv0
OK. Come to Bali to meet me. There are many Russians here now. We can make a conference and plan the dismantlement together. We'll go look for beautiful girls later that night.
Thank you very much for the invitation! Wife will not let me )))))))))))))))
I'm married too. Bring your wife over!
It's no true, badcontact. It's only propaganda. North Korea is one of the nuclear States more advanced in the world and has built thousands of bunker under its soil in order to defend its citoyens from an attack of the Western World.
It's not true North Korea has nukes? What about the time they tested a nuke, and said "We have nukes"? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/25/north-korea-hiroshima-nuclear-test
Don't let you be misunderstood. I've told that North Korea has nukes and it's one of the more advanced nuclear States in the world.
I understand what you are saying now. I thought you said North Korea does not have nuclear weapons. You are saying North Korea has nuclear weapons, and that they are more advanced that we understand. Yes, I can agree. Why do their people starve to death? Why does China not help them?
North Korean people don't starve to death. This is another dirty lie of your governors to cloroformize their starved people.
What about the video footage released from hidden cameras, of kids picking up rice grains in the street? Or bags of UN food being sold? I can't accept that those videos are fake, they are clearly in Pyongyang.
Everything shown in TV by the american governors is fake. You live in a parallel world. I beg you. Open your eyes or you'll find in the mud while you think to swim in the blue water of the ocean.
Dutch? http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/welcome-to-north-korea/
It's hard for us to read Russian! Your letters are all backwards. It looks like ancient Greek. No English version?
Please in English :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons
Well, to see the big picture you might want to see this video of a CIA whistle blower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G43zl4fzDQg
We have been attacking Pakistan for years. What do you think that joke of a reason (for OBL) was all about? It was a raid on their intellegence building.
This is unconstitutional and these actions are via resolution by the UN. Only congress should have the power to send American fighting men to protect this nation's sovereignty. Mr Paul for President. He promises to do away with executive orders and all unconstitutional acts or legislation currently in place, withdraw the USofA from the UN and NATO, shut down The Fed and give the power back to the states of which our overly large and incorporated Federal government has overstepped and taken.
It wasn't "the united states" but rather NATO planes and helicopters. Those forces are not under the US commanders in Afghanistan, but under their own NATO commander. While I understand we make up a signigicant part of the NATO forces, your attempt to blame soley the U.S. for this unfortunate friendly fire incident is a clear obviscation of the truth, and typical of left-wing loons like you.
You are clearly misguided. NATO is under US control, has been since WWII. We could wipe our ass with the NATO countries and not break a sweat. Sucks but true.
PS- this is not my personal belief, but what mulitiple people in the military and even one who works for NATO have told me over the years. NATO just simply deflects attentino from the US, as your post proves.
It will be interesting to watch this unfold. If Pakistan refuses to reopen the supply lines it will hasten a withdrawal. Australia is the latest member where the population is demanding/requesting a departure from involvement.
Wow, you are way behind the times...
I know i was just stating the Obvious
Why is it such a shock that two armies in the same region had a battle. How do you know what happened? Is Pakistan media any more reliable than US media. This is all a bunch of propaganda. It was probably planned by both government.