Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: Amendment!

Posted 5 years ago on Feb. 11, 2013, 7:15 a.m. EST by bensdad (8977)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Section 1. [Artificial Entities Such as Corporations Do Not Have Constitutional Rights]

The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural persons only.

Artificial entities established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state shall have no rights under this Constitution and are subject to regulation by the People, through Federal, State, or local law.

The privileges of artificial entities shall be determined by the People, through Federal, State, or local law, and shall not be construed to be inherent or inalienable.

Section 2. [Money is Not Free Speech]

Federal, State, and local government shall regulate, limit, or prohibit contributions and expenditures, including a candidate's own contributions and expenditures, to ensure that all citizens, regardless of their economic status, have access to the political process, and that no person gains, as a result of their money, substantially more access or ability to influence in any way the election of any candidate for public office or any ballot measure.

Federal, State, and local government shall require that any permissible contributions and expenditures be publicly disclosed.

The judiciary shall not construe the spending of money to influence elections to be speech under the First Amendment.

OWS: http://corporationsarenotpeople.webuda.com

Constitutional Amendment Introduced in Congress
Ensuring Rights for People, Not Corporations
Monday, February 11, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, February 11, 2013

Move To Amend CONTACT:
Glenn Turner, 917-817-3396, glenn@ripplestrategies.com ,
Shayna Samuels, 718-541-4785, shayna@ripplestrategies.com
On the ground in DC: Ben Manski, 707-269-0984, press@movetoamend.org
Constitutional Amendment Introduced in Congress Ensuring Rights for People, Not Corporations
Reps. Nolan & Pocan Respond to Hundreds of Local Resolutions Calling for “We the People” Amendment

(Washington D.C.) - The movement for constitutional reforms that would end what organizers call “corporate rule” has arrived in the chambers of Congress. This morning, two members of the U.S. House of Representatives joined Move to Amend by announcing their sponsorship of the “We the People Amendment,” which clearly and unequivocally states that:

  1. Rights recognized under the Constitution belong to human beings only, and not to government-created artificial legal entities such as corporations and limited liability companies; and
  2. Political campaign spending is not a form of speech protected under the First Amendment.
    In making the announcement, lead sponsor Rep. Rick Nolan (DFL-Minnesota), said: “It’s time to take the shaping and molding of public policy out of corporate boardrooms, away from the corporate lobbyists, and put it back in city halls – back with county boards and state legislatures – and back in the Congress where it belongs.”

Ben Manski, a spokesperson for Move to Amend, agreed, saying: “Today, members of Congress join a movement that insists on the fundamental equality of all Americans, and that rejects the idea that the corporate class should have special protections against We the People.”

The Move to Amend coalition was formed in 2009 in preparation for the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision. Today, the coalition of nearly 260,000 people and hundreds of organizations has helped to pass nearly 500 resolutions in municipalities and local governments across the country calling on the state and federal governments to adopt this amendment.

The Move to Amend coalition makes a point of differentiating themselves from the other proposals that have come forward in response to Citizens United. "In every single community where Americans have had the opportunity to call for a Constitutional amendment to outlaw corporate personhood, they have seized it and voted yes overwhelmingly, stated George Friday, Move to Amend spokesperson. “The Citizens United decision is not the cause, it is a symptom. We must remove big money and special interests from the legal and political process entirely."



Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by mideast (506) 5 years ago

has this been introduced as a bill yet ?
who are the sponsors? Nolan & Pocan? Others?.
Where do the 2012 amendment bill suporters stand on this bill?

[-] 3 points by 99nproud (2697) 5 years ago

This should be a good measure of who supports the 99%. Do you have a link of who voted for the 2012 amend you refer to?

[-] 3 points by mideast (506) 5 years ago

there are 12-13 amendments that were proposed in the last session of congress. Around 100 reps & senators "sponsored" or supported them. details on our OWS site

most of the 2012 versions ( which MAY be re-introduced ) have a serious flaw - the address citizens united OR corporate personhood - but not BOTH - as this new one does.
Some very big names are on the 2012 versions such as Udall, Schumer, Sanders

THE BIG ISSUE: to get this ball rolling, we need a 2/3 vote in both houses. The filibuster will stop it in the Senate & the 1% Rs in the house, led by crazies such as louis gomert in the house judiciary committee will stop it

elect more real 99% supporters in the House & Senate
and yes, that means voting against the 1% Rs and for the 99% Ds

[-] 1 points by 99nproud (2697) 5 years ago

Thank you.

[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 5 years ago

PS -- Tune in to Move to Amend Reports this evening to learn more. Our internet radio program airs tonight on Blog Talk Radio at 5pm Pacific / 8pm Eastern. The guest is Ben Manski, Move to Amend National Leadership Team member. He will speak about the implications of the We the People Amendment. The line will be open to take your questions.

PPS -- Please take a moment to thank Rep. Nolan and Pocan for standing with Move to Amend: Rick Nolan's Facebook page is here and Mark Pocan's page is here. Or, if you live in their Districts, you can thank them directly through their Congressional websites here: Nolan and Pocan.

[-] 2 points by bensdad (8977) 5 years ago

The great feature of THIS bill's amendment is that it covers BOTH
corporate personhood & citizens united

Call or email your senator or rep to support this bill


[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 5 years ago

I will.

[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 5 years ago

Update on this? Introduced? Republicans block it yet?

[-] 2 points by bensdad (8977) 5 years ago

it has been In the House, it will go to the Judiciary Committee first - which, will stall it. that is why we need to VOTE in Ds who will support it

[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 5 years ago



[-] 1 points by owsarmy (271) 5 years ago

1st step in a long process.